Review
-
ORQA: An Occupation-Realistic Question and Answer Framework for LLM Professional Knowledge
2026-09-11 02:36:21Shreyas Krishnan, Serina Chang, Abhishek NagarajAbstract
We present ORQA, a method for testing occupation-level knowledge in large language models. Prior methods either map abstract LLM skills to occupations via task definitions or utilize expert knowledge which is difficult to obtain at scale and expensive. ORQA complements both of these methods by connecting O*NET occupations to trusted occupation-specific websites (such as regulatory agencies, licensing bodies, professional organizations, and government publications) and converting these into source-traceable question-answer pairs. A combination of an automated pipeline and human review produces a set of high quality questions about occupations. The question set created via our method covers 116 occupations from all 21 major groups in the SOC, with 480 questions sourced from 187 different websites. Each question is designed to probe a real-world skill question that is relevant to the occupation in question. We test 15 state-of-the-art frontier and open-weight models via this method. Claude Opus 4.6, GPT-5.4 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 all perform the best at approximately 58-62% while smaller open-weight models achieve approximately 33-41% performance. Performance varies significantly across occupations. Healthcare-related occupations achieve the highest performance (78%) while Office and Administrative Support achieve approximately 40%. Performance on individual occupations (e.g. Sheet Metal Workers and Fish and Game Wardens) is essentially zero. We also find that open-ended questions and weighting by wage bill do not significantly affect the ranking of models on this benchmark. We believe that leveraging existing trusted occupation-specific information to test LLM knowledge in professional domains may be a scalable and useful method for evaluating occupation-level AI performance in the future. Results and data are available at this http URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12366
PDF
-
I Am No One: Style-Aware Paraphrasing for Text Anonymization
2026-09-11 02:07:26Ahmed Sohair Khan, Estrid He, Monica Wachowicz, Elham NaghizadeAbstract
Authorship attribution models can re-identify users from seemingly anonymized text by exploiting stable stylistic fingerprints, even after explicit identifiers are removed, posing a growing privacy risk for text publishing and analytics. This risk extends to speech-derived text such as ASR transcripts of meetings and call-center conversations, where stylometric leakage can persist even after acoustic anonymization. Differential privacy-based anonymization often severely degrades text quality and utility. We propose a style-aware, prompt-driven anonymization approach that uses pretrained large language models to construct compact stylistic profiles from minimal samples and rewrite text to suppress identifiable style markers while preserving meaning. Across blog and review datasets, our approach reduces authorship attribution F1 by 60-70% while maintaining content quality and readability, substantially outperforming DP-based and non-DP baselines.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12341
PDF
-
Automated Detection and Structuring of Social Tipping Point Evidence in Climate related Documents: A Modular AI Framework
2026-09-10 22:21:16Kavindu Perera, Mohammad Abaeiani, Ekaterina Gilman, Lauri Loven, Mourad Oussalah, Tassos Kanellos, Beatrice Gobbo, Dante Adami, Nicol\`o Ferriani, Maximiliano Romero, Pierre Rossel, Marc Bonazountas, Christina Deligianni, Nikos Xyderis, Artur Bogucki, Lampros Argyriou, Prasasthy BalasubramanianAbstract
The climate literature has grown faster than review teams can read it. That gap matters most for a concept like the environmental social tipping point, the threshold at which a small change triggers rapid, self-reinforcing change in a social system. Evidence of this kind of shift is usually contained in one or two paragraphs within a longer document. As a result, existing text mining tools-which categorize entire documents by topic or highlight isolated claims-leave an expanding set of important evidence without any systematic method for discovery or organization. This paper presents an open and modular transformer-based framework that detects and structures social tipping point evidence at the passage level. The framework joins five components into a single deployable workflow: a DistilBERT boundary splitter for segmentation, an iteratively augmented RoBERTa classifier for detection, a Mistral 7B model that rewrites each detected passage for clarity, a LLaMA 3.2 3B model that rates the passage against five published social tipping point criteria, and a Milvus vector store for semantic retrieval. The system is wrapped in a Streamlit interface backed by MinIO object storage. Evaluated on a 163-passage benchmark labelled by GPT-4.1 and a 51-passage set reviewed by experts, the splitter surpassed three competing methods on a nine-metric composite score (6.137). The tuned RoBERTa model achieved 71.4 percent accuracy with a Cohen's kappa of 0.337 on the full benchmark, and 87.5 percent accuracy with a kappa of 0.742 on passages with labels, outperforming both a climate-focused model and untuned language models.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12254
PDF
-
Population-level measures of perceived food access reveal barriers beyond geographic proximity
2026-09-10 19:02:00Teresa Groton, Benjamin rachunokAbstract
Food access is multidimensional, but population-level measurement still relies heavily on geography because perceived dimensions of access are difficult to measure at scale. Here, we use 25,125 Google Maps reviews from 49 grocery stores in Raleigh, North Carolina, to measure five dimensions of food access: availability, accessibility, affordability, accommodation, and acceptability. We identify review topics with unsupervised topic modeling and assign them to access dimensions using zero-shot classification, with 85.4% agreement against manual coding. The resulting store-level measures capture distinct aspects of food access and reveal barriers that geographic proximity alone does not capture. Comparisons between nearby stores in the same chain further show that identical store policies can be perceived very differently across locations, consistent with food access reflecting the fit between residents and their food environment. Perceived food access also follows systematic socioeconomic and demographic patterns that broadly parallel, but do not replicate, those observed for geographic access. These results show that online grocery reviews can provide a scalable complement to geographic measures of food access.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12132
PDF
-
Extracting Dataset Mentions in Forced Displacement and FCV Documents: A Weakly Supervised Framework with LLM-Based Label Refinement
2026-09-10 18:34:08Rafael Macalaba, Aivin V. Solatorio, Patrick Michael Brock, Olivier DupriezAbstract
Development and humanitarian organizations produce and support surveys, administrative registries, and other data resources to inform research, policy, and operations, yet systematically identifying where these datasets are referenced remains difficult. Such references are dispersed across research papers, project documents, humanitarian reports, and other unstructured text, limiting both the ability to trace data use and to identify potential gaps in data availability or dissemination. We present a weakly supervised framework for adapting dataset extraction to forced displacement and Fragile, Conflict, and Violence (FCV) documents without first constructing a large manually labeled training corpus. A lightweight model trained on general research literature generates candidate dataset mentions from unlabeled domain documents, which a frontier large language model (LLM) reviews in context, validating or rejecting candidates and correcting their extraction boundaries. The resulting annotations are supplemented with targeted synthetic and contrastive examples and used to fine-tune the lightweight model for large-scale extraction. We evaluate the resulting model on an independent gold-standard benchmark of 1,706 text passages spanning research, humanitarian, and operational documents. Across the full benchmark, the model achieves 74.1\% precision and 70.5\% recall at the mention level; among passages containing dataset references, precision reaches 89.5\%. At the passage level, the model achieves 88.2\% accuracy and 88.6\% specificity in distinguishing passages with dataset references from those without them. These results demonstrate a practical approach for constructing domain-specific supervision when labeled data are limited, and provide a technical foundation for larger-scale analysis of data use and potential gaps in the displacement data landscape.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12107
PDF
-
PRISMA-LLM: An Empirical Reporting Framework for AI-Assisted Systematic Reviews
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) and AI-enabled software increasingly participate in systematic-review decisions, yet the information needed to audit these workflows is reported inconsistently. We analyze SciLitBench, a corpus of 888 review-automation papers with 14,726 annotations, to characterize changes in methods, review-stage use, evaluation and reported limitations. Automation has shifted toward LLM- and software-facing workflows, including stages that can alter the evidence base. Since 2023, 38.0% of software/product papers reported no evaluation, compared with 9.3% of LLM papers. Reporting coverage increased with LLM workflow complexity, yet 52% of positive-only LLM evaluations still reported an unmet reliability or performance requirement. From these patterns, we introduce PRISMA-LLM, an empirically grounded framework separating implementation disclosure from consequence-sensitive evaluation and limitation reporting.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11559
PDF
-
ReGround: Grounding Reviewer Comments in Multimodal Evidence
Abstract
Reviewer comments naturally relate to specific parts of the reviewed paper, yet grounding these comments to the underlying evidence is difficult due to long multimodal documents. Existing benchmarks do not capture this setting and largely focus on explicit, information-seeking queries. We introduce ReGround, a large-scale dataset for reviewer comment grounding that links 10,267 reviewer comments to 16,274 evidence in the original anonymous submission of 3,656 papers. We build on a simple observation: author rebuttals often include explicit references to content of the submission used to address reviewer comments, providing a high-precision annotation source. We cast grounding as a retrieval task and evaluate a wide range of retrieval methods. Results show that retrieval over the entire paper content performs poorly, evidence-type inference is a major bottleneck, and multimodal evidence provides complementary signals that text alone misses. Our dataset exposes grounding reviewer comments as a difficult and practically important problem for scientific document understanding.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11460
PDF
-
Cognitive Digital Twins: Ethical Risks and Governance for AI Systems That Model the Mind
2026-09-10 10:11:14Vamshi Krishna Bonagiri, Juan Nicolas Sepulveda-Arias, Abdoul Jalil Djiberou Mahamadou, Monojit ChoudhuryAbstract
As AI systems become increasingly persistent and personalized, they make possible a class of technologies that we call cognitive digital twins (CDTs): dynamic computational representations of a specific person's cognition, updated from behavioral, contextual, or physiological data in order to model, predict, or simulate that person's cognition, or to act as that person's communicative or decision-making proxy. CDTs combine cognitive inference with longitudinal representation, simulation, and proxy action in ways that existing governance strategies for personal assistants, autonomous agents, recommender systems, and automated decision systems only partially address. This paper makes four contributions. First, we define CDTs and distinguish them from adjacent systems. Second, we introduce a 5A governance framework organized around authority, autonomy, access and control, accountability, and availability. Third, we identify CDT-specific risks, from misrepresentation and epistemic authority shifts to shadow twins, simulated participation, proxy action, and proxy-power asymmetries. Fourth, we analyze governance gaps and propose requirements for high-risk CDTs that strengthen consent, purpose limitation, validity, traceability, contestation, independent review, and model retirement. Existing frameworks primarily regulate data processing, automated decisions, or autonomous actions; CDTs also require governance at the level of cognitive representation itself, before any final decision or external action occurs. We argue that CDTs require governance not only because they can act for people, but because they can become infrastructures through which cognition is represented, simulated, classified, and operationalized.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.23094
PDF
-
Assessing the Reusability of Public Speech Resources for Low-Resource Languages: A Central Kurdish Case Study
Abstract
Kurdish is spoken by millions of people, but little technology can read it aloud. A recent study released three Kurdish voices, 35 hours of recorded speech, and a paper describing the work, all free to download. This review checks how well those public files match the paper. The research is careful about its limits, but the files contain several problems: a settings file lists equipment that was never used, test recordings are left unlabeled among training data, and a coding fault mishandles long numbers. The download page also claims a stronger result than the paper reports and recommends one voice for general use. That recommendation matters because Kurdish has major regional and written variation, while these voices were built from three people reading prepared texts. The process therefore removes much everyday and regional speech. English and German benefit from long traditions of dictionaries and linguistic description that help identify wrong pronunciations; Kurdish has far less such support, so software choices can go unchecked. The voices sound fluent, but they represent the reading styles of their speakers rather than Kurdish as a whole. Most of these issues can be fixed using information the team already has, without changing the reported results. Better records would mainly make the work easier for others, especially community linguists, to check and reuse. The license is the main exception: whether audiobook owners allow corrected versions to be shared will affect whether future Kurdish voices can build on this work or must start again.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11246
PDF
-
NovGauge: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Diagnosing LLMs' Capability in Paper Novelty Assessment
2026-09-10 08:34:56Guoqiang Zhang, Kexin Tan, Ming Zhang, Li Ju, Wenqing Jing, Zhonghan Yue, Jiayi Chen, Shiqiang Wu, Shaofan Liu, Yue Zhang, Yuankai Ying, Yang Shi, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing HuangAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in peer review at major AI conferences, yet novelty remains a persistent weak point. Existing benchmarks assess novelty as a single holistic score, making it difficult to diagnose which dimension a model misjudges or whether its evidence is faithful. We present NovGauge, a human-anchored benchmark for fine-grained novelty assessment diagnosis. The benchmark contains 619 paper pairs and 50 multi-paper sets, drawn from two expert sources: ICLR reviewer overlap claims and survey co-citations. Instances are independently labeled along three dimensions: task, problem, and method, capturing application goals, technical challenges, and solution approaches. We propose a cascading diagnostic pipeline that verifies per-dimension correctness, evidence grounding, and logical support. Evaluation of 18 LLMs shows hallucination rates ranging from 0% to 39% across dimensions, and among non-hallucinated correct-positive judgments, over 70% cite evidence fails to logically support the stated reason. The best-performing model, GPT-5.5, achieves 43-72% Verified F1 across dimensions, while most models retain less than half of their raw F1 after faithfulness verification. These results suggest that current LLMs remain far from reliable scientific novelty assessment, particularly when correctness is conditioned on faithful evidence grounding.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11234
PDF
-
The Machines Are Calling: Measuring Automated and Synthetic Voices in Unwanted Inbound Calls
2026-09-10 06:28:50Xingyu Shen, Tommy Duong, Muduo Xu, Xiaodong An, Jiaqi Gan, Haoyuan Tang, Jamey Z. Liang, Siyu Zhang, Yan Zhang, Simiao RenAbstract
In February 2024 the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) placed AI-generated voices under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). Yet no peer-reviewed measurement says how much unwanted call traffic is placed by a machine, or how much of that machine speech is synthesized rather than played from a recording. We report both with a disclosed pipeline. An interactive voice honeypot (language-model personas on real U.S. numbers, the caller recorded on its own track) recorded 10,987 calls over 66 days; 11 days on which our stack answered silently are set aside. Three instruments read each opening: an audio fingerprint that finds the same recording played on other calls, a commercial synthetic-speech detector on the caller's first ten seconds, and blinded listeners who check what it flags. Of the 7,233 calls our persona greeted on normal days, 13.8% open with a recording we also heard on another call, and 13.1% with fresh audio the detector labels synthetic. A further 9.9% open with a caller who never spoke after our greeting, 54.2% with fresh audio the detector labels human, and 9.0% could not be scored. Machine-voiced openings are therefore at least 26.9%, a further tenth of calls are silent connections we read as machine-placed, and replays of a recording make up 45% of the detector's own rate (29.3% of 6,192 scored openings). The same waveform played on two calls lands on opposite sides of the detector's threshold 13.6% of the time, and eleven listeners confirm 54.4% of what it flags. Synthetic openings concentrate in lead-generation spam (33.8%), not fraud (21.1%); 0.44% disclose automation. Prevalence tracks how long a bait number has circulated (59% against 19% in the same weeks): seeding history, not calendar time, explains the trend. Campaigns outlast their numbers: one recorded compliance notice opens calls in six campaigns, and one synthetic voice serves nine.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11137
PDF
-
The Agent Incident Registry: Toward Preventing Repeated AI Agent Failures
2026-09-10 03:20:46Divyanshu Kumar, Rohith HN, Nitin Aravind Birur, Sahil Agarwal, Prashanth HarshangiAbstract
AI agents increasingly act through tools and delegated authority, but general incident repositories rarely capture the mechanisms needed to compare public failures with agent-security evaluations. We present the Agent Incident Registry (AIR), a source-linked catalog containing \N{} records of agent-related events disclosed from \Yfirst{} through \Ylast{}. Each record includes supporting evidence, a stable identifier, and missingness-aware labels for causal role, disclosure class, mechanism, and outcome. Among the \Nprimary{} generative-system records in which the agent acted, \Rprimary{} involved realized harm (\Pprimary\%). Realized outcomes concentrate in in-the-wild and safety-failure records, while responsible disclosures and research demonstrations are overwhelmingly demonstrated; the aggregate share therefore characterizes collection composition rather than deployment risk. After initial curation, a second human reviewer checked all \N{} records and their existing labels for completeness and correctness. In a deployment-analogue audit, InjecAgent's \NInjecAgentCases{} cases occupy three of AIR's twelve surfaces and are all attacker-triggered, whereas AIR contains \Nsafety{} no-adversary safety failures. AIR supports source-grounded case retrieval and evaluation-scope auditing, not failure-rate or control-efficacy estimation.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11030
PDF
-
Defining AI Agents: A Compendium of Criteria, Metrics, and Benchmarks
Abstract
The term agent in artificial intelligence lacks a standard definition, complicating the evaluation, comparison, and reproducibility of AI agent research. We address this ambiguity through a survey organized around five dimensions of agenticness: environmental interaction, learning and adaptation, autonomy, goal-directed behavior, and temporal coherence. For each dimension, we examine how the underlying capability has been conceptualized across prior work and synthesize the metrics, benchmarks, and evaluation frameworks used to assess it. This review provides a structured account of the current landscape of agent evaluation, highlighting both established approaches and areas where evaluation remains limited or inconsistent. We additionally introduce the Agent Compendium, a public-facing digital resource that organizes and extends the evaluation methods identified through this review. Together, the survey and compendium provide a common structure for evaluating and comparing agent capabilities across AI systems, supporting more reproducible research, clearer communication, and more systematic study of artificial agents.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.11018
PDF
-
NCP-ArchPreview Technical Report: Moving towards Latent Space Language Models through Next Concept Prediction
2026-09-09 18:12:43NCP Team, Jiaqi Cao, Chiyu Chen, Shuang Cheng, Xu Cheng, Beiya Dai, Yufan Feng, Kewen Ge, Ruijun Ge, Jiayi Huang, Yang Jiao, Dahua Lin, Zhouhan Lin, Yifan Liu, Yuliang Liu, Biqing Qi, Mowen Ruan, Junzhe Shen, Yunchong Song, Hao Sun, Zhongbo Tian, Yixuan Wang, Rubin Wei, Jiaxin Xiong, Kangyu Yang, Qian Yao, Qi Zhang, Bowen ZhouAbstract
We introduce NCP-ArchPreview, a latent-space language model that pushes autoregressive pretraining beyond standard next-token prediction (NTP). Alongside NTP, the model learns through Next Concept Prediction (NCP) to predict discrete concepts that span multiple tokens, introducing an explicit and more challenging concept-level objective while preserving standard token-level autoregressive generation. NCP-ArchPreview builds a latent space by constructing a product-quantized concept vocabulary directly from its hidden states, and subsequently learns to predict future concepts via a dedicated Concept Module. These predicted concepts are then fed back to the token level to guide subsequent generation, with NTP and NCP trained jointly end-to-end. We scale this architecture to 8.9B parameters and train it on 5.73T tokens from the Dolma-3 dataset, marking the largest demonstration of a latent-space language model to date. Remarkably, by consuming only 51.3% of the total training tokens, NCP-ArchPreview achieves the final pretraining loss of OLMo-3-7B. Following full pretraining, it outperforms OLMo-3-7B by 2.45 points on the downstream macro-average, including a notable 5.99-point gain on GSM8K. Controlled experiments isolate a clear progression of performance gains stemming from both the latent architecture and the NCP objective. Furthermore, utilizing only 85% of the standard computation, NCP-ArchPreview approaches the training loss of a strictly parameter-aligned 8.9B baseline. The learned latent space remains highly valuable after the pretraining stage: updating just the 17M-parameter VQ module yields a novel, lightweight interface for domain adaptation, while a simple injection of concept representations into a DFlash2 drafter improves the mean accepted length by 4.17% with negligible overhead.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10715
PDF
-
From Semantic to Token Communication: The Next Paradigm for Large-Model-Driven 6G Intelligent Connectivity
2026-09-09 18:11:38Yu Ma, Zhen Gao, Li Qiao, Xiaoyuan Zhang, Mahdi Boloursaz Mashhadi, Yin Xu, Wenjun Xu, Xiaodong Xu, Kaibin Huang, Jiangzhou Wang, Rahim Tafazolli, Sheng Chen, Tony Q. S. Quek, Ping ZhangAbstract
The ambitious requirements of sixth-generation (6G) networks are driving communication systems from reliable bit delivery toward meaning-aware and task-oriented connectivity. Large models (LMs), with strong multimodal understanding and generation capabilities, have accelerated this shift and made semantic communication (SemCom) increasingly practical. Yet current LM-driven SemCom remains fragmented: semantic representations are typically tied to specific modalities, models, or tasks. While the bit provides a universal unit for digital transport, there is still no analogous unit for representing and processing semantics, which limits interoperability, theoretical unification, and scalable system design. We argue that tokens provide a natural candidate for this missing abstraction. Two trends support this: unified multimodal LMs now encode text, images, audio, video, and robot actions in one token space, while distributed LM inference already generates substantial token-level traffic through expert routing, cache transfer, and speculative decoding. Token communication (TokenCom) emerges by unifying these trends, using the LM's native processing unit as a communication abstraction above the bit level and enabling importance assignment, error handling, and resource allocation directly at token granularity. This survey traces the evolution from LM-driven SemCom to TokenCom. We review three major directions of LM-driven SemCom: source-centric semantic coding, channel semantics for physical-layer tasks, and collaborative edge-device intelligence. We then examine the token abstraction, the transmission techniques it requires, and two emerging paradigms, namely TokenCom for LM services and for embodied and agentic intelligence. Finally, we identify open challenges toward unified, scalable, and AI-native 6G communication systems.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10714
PDF
-
A Comprehensive Review of One-Pixel Attack: Research Status, Taxonomy, Applications, Regulation Policy and Future Directions
2026-09-09 17:20:16Mirza Niaz Morshed, Md. Masudul Islam, Galib Muhammad Shahriar Himel, Md. Aslam Uddin, Hui Liu, Md. Shafiqul IslamAbstract
One-Pixel Attacks (OPAs) represent one of the most extreme demonstrations of adversarial fragility in deep learning, where modifying a single pixel can reliably induce high-confidence misclassification across domains such as medical diagnosis, autonomous driving, biometrics, and quantum communication. Despite their conceptual simplicity, OPAs remain underexamined in existing adversarial-attack surveys, which provide only fragmented or cursory coverage. This PRISMA-guided review synthesizes high-quality studies from 2017 to 2026 and delivers a unified, multi-axis taxonomy of OPA research spanning algorithmic foundations, black-box evolutionary optimization, emerging hybrid and program-synthesis attacks, defence mechanisms, interpretability tools, and domain-specific vulnerabilities. Our analysis reveals the dominance of Differential Evolution-based strategies, the rise of efficiency-optimized and saliency-guided methods, and persistent gaps in dataset diversity, transferability, and standardized evaluation. We summarized and assess defence paradigms including pixel restoration, anomaly detection, input-space transformations, and robust training highlighting their trade-offs in robustness, imperceptibility, and computational overhead. Building on these insights, we outline future research priorities involving selective pixel recovery, transformer-specific vulnerability analysis, saliency-driven optimization, and real-world domain-adaptive defences. We further propose a regulatory framework emphasizing robustness testing, incident disclosure, and AI security governance. This review establishes a comprehensive foundation for understanding, evaluating, and mitigating ultra-sparse adversarial threats in contemporary AI systems.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.00125
PDF
-
Emergency Department Revisit Quality Review Screening: Exploring Human Decision-Making and Artificial Intelligence Support
2026-09-09 16:37:35Jonathan A. Handler, Marlene I. Robles-Granda, Jacob E. Mefford, Jeremy S. McGarvey, Gregory S. Podolej, Colleen J. Klein, Matthew D. Dalstrom, William F. BondAbstract
Background: Emergency Department (ED) return visits are commonly reviewed for quality assurance, but are often limited (e.g., to revisits within 48-72 hours) to increase actionable finding yield while minimizing chart review burden. Those limitations may lead to missed quality improvement opportunities. Methods: We conducted an exploratory, retrospective study of randomly selected ED visits to a multihospital health system having an ED revisit within 1-14 days to the same health system. Given only each visit's primary diagnosis, raters (2-3 clinicians and GPT-4 large language model [LLM]) assessed characteristics of the diagnosis pairs, including the "target": whether a pair warranted further assessment. Informed by rater response analyses, an algorithm leveraging an LLM-populated knowledge graph ("KGA") was created to automatically screen for potentially concerning pairs, then preliminarily assessed. Results: 99 diagnosis pairs were included. GPT-4 responses poorly correlated to clinician raters, rating nearly all (94%) pairs as warranting follow-up (4.4-13.3 times more than clinicians). However, prompt engineering was minimal. Among clinician raters, revisit medical gravity was consistently significantly associated with the target, while a differential diagnosis/complication composite was significantly associated on unadjusted, but not adjusted (though less powered) analysis. The KGA achieved 83-100% positive predictive value for at least one clinician rater determining further assessment was warranted based on the diagnosis pair. Conclusion: These results can inform next steps for improving screening with LLMs like ChatGPT. Further research is warranted to validate this preliminary work's finding that the KGA may enable enhancing the scope and yield of screening without substantially increasing reviewer workload.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10421
PDF
-
Ergodic Control and Controlled Diffusion for Robot Learning: Review and Tutorial
2026-09-09 16:24:33Max Muchen Sun, Cem Bilaloglu, Ananya Rao, Stefan Ivic, Guillaume Sartoretti, Kathleen Fitzsimons, Ian Abraham, Sylvain Calinon, Todd MurpheyAbstract
Diffusion learning leverages the statistical mechanism of diffusion processes for learning, reasoning, and inferring complex distributions from data. Recent advances in diffusion learning have been transformative, with robot learning emerging as a key opportunity area, with applications spanning perception, control, and decision-making. At the same time, the statistical mechanism of diffusion processes can be controlled to shape the temporal evolution of the state distribution underlying robot trajectories, inducing ergodic behavior in robotic systems. The frameworks of controlled diffusion and ergodic control were developed around the same time as diffusion learning, and their theories and algorithms have increasingly converged. Ergodicity induced by controlled diffusion has several significant implications for robot learning, distinct from applying diffusion learning to robotics problems: it formally enforces statistical properties required to ensure optimality of robot learning, enables non-myopic search over uncertain information landscapes for data collection, and enables behavior specification based on spatial rather than temporal characteristics of trajectories. This survey introduces the intuition behind controlled diffusion for robot learning, explores its connection to diffusion learning, presents theoretical foundations and numerical tutorials for solving controlled diffusion and ergodic control problems, and reviews applications across robotics. Finally, we discuss key challenges and future opportunities in leveraging controlled diffusion for robot learning.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13295
PDF
-
MOONWALK: Mediating Operations with Intent-Evidence-Action Alignment Across Junior-Supervisor Review Workflows in Animation/VFX Pre-Production
2026-09-09 16:10:29Shih-Yu Lai, Wen-Fan Wang, Sai Ling, Shaune Jan, Bing-Yu Chen, Xiang Anthony ChenAbstract
Animation and VFX pre-production review requires teams to translate loosely specified creative intent--briefs, evolving specifications, heterogeneous references, and verbal decisions--into revisions that junior artists can execute without repeated clarification. In practice, criteria drift across iterations, review judgments lose their evidential basis, and the reasoning behind a request rarely survives the senior-junior handoff. We contribute a design framework for intent-evidence-action alignment: intent is articulated into a shared project record, judgments are anchored to grounded evidence, and authorized decisions are converted into clear revision tasks tied directly to reference notes. We instantiate this framework in MOONWALK, a professional pre-production review system comprising a shared intent record, reference/specification anchoring, structured work-in-progress comparison, and supervisor-authorized action planning. In this workflow, AI handles administrative coordination--flagging missing context and organizing notes--while artists retain full creative direction. An in-studio study with professional practitioners compares MOONWALK with a chat-only (chatbot) interface using matched production materials, while participants' existing workflows provide a retrospective ecological baseline. Results indicate stronger intent alignment, decision traceability, and checklist executability, while also showing that aesthetic authority and final prioritization must remain with practitioners. The evaluation establishes the value of the integrated structured workflow over unstructured conversational AI chatbot. Code: this https URL
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10385
PDF
-
Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for the Detection of Pathologies Related to Lung Cancer through Image Analysis using Convolutional Neural Networks and Data Augmentation: a systematic mapping of the literature
2026-09-09 14:27:31Pablo Ramirez AmadorAbstract
Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, and its early diagnosis is crucial to improving patients prognosis and quality of life. However, the process of interpreting medical images for the detection of lung cancer is complex and requires trained experts. In this context, artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL) emerge as potential tools to automate and optimize image analysis. The objective of this work is to review the most recent and relevant applications of AI and DL in the field of radiology for the detection of lung cancer. To this end, an exhaustive search was carried out in scientific databases such as PubMed,IEEEXPLORE, Scopus and Web of Science, and 96 articles published from 2015 to the present addressing the use of AI and DL in biomedical engineering were selected. Emphasis is placed on the use of convolutional neural networks (CNN) with transfer learning and Data Augmentation as promising techniques to improve the accuracy and efficiency of the image interpretation process. The results show that the use of AI and DL can offer an effective alternative for the early diagnosis of lung cancer, with high sensitivity and specificity. However, current limitations and challenges that must be addressed to guarantee its responsible and safe application in clinical practice are also identified, such as the lack of standardized data, the ex plainability of the models, patient privacy, and the ethical and social implications. It is concluded that the use of AI and DL can have a positive impact on the care of patients with lung cancer, but further research and regulation are required to ensure its quality and reliability.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10652
PDF
