Neyshekar is presented as an open Persian read-speech corpus designed for coverage of both formal and informal language, named entities, and longer utterances. In version 6, 62,279 validated recordings totalling 99.02 hours are provided from 190 contributors, with 34,541 distinct recorded prompts. The prompt pool was assembled from human-written material, contextualised homographs, and reviewed language-model-generated text. Text entries were normalised with the shekar library, which supports both formal and informal Persian, and every submitted recording was reviewed against a common validation rubric. About 24% of released clips are classified as informal by an automatic classifier; these register labels are not human-validated. Item-level rater labels are provided for reproducible agreement estimation, opaque per-clip contributor identifiers make the speaker-disjoint partitioning auditable and support contributor-clustered uncertainty estimates, and a text-disjoint test subset is included for evaluation beyond previously seen prompts. Per-contributor recording load and reference-free signal quality are characterised for every released clip. Corpus characteristics are compared with Persian Common Voice under shared processing. Utility is assessed through two ASR architectures, three optimisation seeds, WER and CER, and independent evaluation on the public PSRB sample. Against duration-matched Common Voice training at approximately 32 hours, in-domain WER is reduced by 9.5 points for Whisper and 11.6 points for XLS-R, and by approximately eight points for both architectures on the independent PSRB sample. Transfer and mixture benefits are not consistently observed across architectures and training budgets. The corpus is released under CC0; code and data are made available through the project repository at this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.14542
AI scaling studies increasingly evaluate systems that combine a pretrained model with retrieval, search, verification, tools, and interaction. Yet a higher score under a larger budget does not by itself show where additional resources are best spent. This critical integrative review asks when a reported scaling result supports a resource-allocation decision. It compares evidence across pretraining, test-time computation, retrieval, and agent evaluation, distinguishing the performance of a tested procedure from the best performance achievable under a resource limit. The synthesis shows that three mismatches recur across this evidence: success counted before an answer is chosen, information a deployed system will not have, and costs left out of the comparison. A capability surface expresses performance as a function of budgets, mechanisms, and available information. Worked analytical examples show how the evaluation metric, deployment volume, selection rule, and stopping policy can alter an allocation conclusion. A resource envelope provides a structured record of the task, development and run-time resources, information access, and procedure behind a reported score. Its application to a published comparison illustrates which conclusions the evidence supports and which deployment questions remain unresolved. The resulting framework specifies the comparisons needed to choose among feasible systems and motivates experiments on the transfer of allocation rules across tasks and operating conditions. It does not propose a universal scaling law or infer general intelligence from benchmark gains.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.14500
Recent advances in multimodal foundation models have intensified the need to understand how different modalities share, preserve, and complement information. Mutual Information (MI), the Information Bottleneck (IB), and Partial Information Decomposition (PID) provide complementary perspectives, yet existing studies often treat them as isolated tools. This survey presents an information-theoretic perspective connecting these principles as progressively refined views of multimodal information processing: MI characterizes inter-modal dependency, IB explains task-oriented information preservation under compression, and PID decomposes preserved information into redundancy, uniqueness, and synergy. We review 170 recent studies (2018--2026) and 12 foundational works, organizing multimodal learning around four challenges: cross-modal alignment, information-efficient fusion, interaction-type characterization, and scaling to multimodal foundation models. Rather than using application domains as primary taxonomy axes, we interpret healthcare, robotics, recommendation systems, affective computing, and wireless communications as empirical validations of these information principles. Beyond taxonomy, we organize existing multimodal paradigms within a single information-theoretic coordinate system -- the Generalized Multimodal Information Lagrangian -- in which they occupy exact or approximate parameter corners, and whose unoccupied regions name candidate method families the literature has not yet built. We further discuss how emerging multimodal foundation models instantiate these principles at scale and identify open challenges including scalable information estimation in high-dimensional settings, standardized evaluation across information-theoretic methods, combinatorial complexity of multimodal PID, and the transition from post-hoc information analysis toward information-aware multimodal learning.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.14421
Computed tomography (CT) plays an essential role in clinical workflow to improve patient outcomes. However, access to CT imaging and specialist interpretation remains limited, particularly in rural, regional, remote (RRR), and other resource-limited settings. Recent advances in mobile CT, telehealth, and artificial intelligence (AI) provide opportunities to extend advanced imaging services to populations in RRR settings. This review examines: 1) mobile CT systems deployed in trucks, trailers, ambulances, and other mobile platforms; 2) telehealth technologies supporting CT-based healthcare; and 3) AI for CT that has received regulatory authorisation or is currently deployed in clinical practice. Applications are evaluated across four clinical functions: screening and diagnosis, patient monitoring, risk prediction, and intervention or therapeutic decision support. The review covers neurological, thoracic, cardiovascular, abdominal, oncological, musculoskeletal, and interventional imaging, with particular attention to stroke, cancer, and other image-guided treatment. Other factors such as regulatory status, deployment status, and estimated technology readiness (TRL) level are compared. Current evidence indicates that mobile CT, telehealth, and AI for conventional CT are individually relatively mature, but fully integration of these technologies remains less widely deployed and validated in the clinical settings. Key barriers include regulatory variation, domain shift, connectivity requirements, cost, workflow integration, cybersecurity, and limited evidence of patient-level benefit. Future research should prioritise prospective, multicentre evaluation of integrated CT systems in real-world and underserved clinical settings.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.14347
Criterion-level grading connects examination performance to learning outcomes, but manual marking introduces workload and variation between markers. This study evaluates vision-language models (VLMs) for handwritten outcome-based assessment across five dimensions: accuracy, human agreement, repeated-run reliability, error concentration, and explanation quality. Using 1,982 criterion-level records from 485 undergraduate examination answers, we compare 20 configurations spanning Qwen2.5-VL, InternVL3, Pixtral, a Donut baseline, and a cascade ensemble. Evaluation setups include zero-shot prompting, few-shot prompting, partial fine-tuning, and Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA). Two independent faculty markers regraded all 291 test criteria, providing a human agreement baseline on the same assessment materials. Qwen2.5-VL with LoRA achieved Quadratic Weighted Kappa (QWK) of 0.727 and mean absolute error of 0.435 marks against the examiner, compared with mean human-pair QWK of 0.551. This comparison reflects calibration to the examiner's training marks. LoRA outperformed partial fine-tuning for all three instruction-tuned VLMs, while few-shot prompting reduced QWK in every configuration with valid prompted scores. Aggregate reliability and exact repeatability diverged: intraclass correlations ranged from 0.790 to 0.874, yet 50.2-63.6% of criteria changed marks across five sampled runs. Attention-guided deletion showed no statistically significant advantage over random masking, and four faculty reviewers reached no consensus on explanation usefulness. These findings highlight the need for rubric-specific calibration, repeatable scoring, review of consequential errors, and separate validation of explanations. The released evaluation protocol supports criterion-level assessment research and grading tools with teacher oversight.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.14284
With the rapid proliferation of large language model (LLM)-based systems, AI companions have emerged as conversational agents designed to cultivate emotional connection rather than primarily to support humans in instrumental tasks. Because engagement with AI companions involves relational, emotional, and potentially long-term interactions, their design is consequential. Prior work has offered guidance for designing trustworthy and relational AI systems and has begun to examine design for AI companionship. However, while such work provides insights into possible design solutions, less is known about what makes AI companion design difficult as a design problem. To examine this challenge, we assessed the applicability of existing design recommendations from adjacent domains in the context of AI companion design. Our multi-method investigation unfolded across four phases: literature review, practitioner co-analysis, internal heuristic evaluation, and external expert assessment. Throughout this process, we synthesized nine design principle areas that surfaced tensions in the applicability of existing recommendations to AI companion design. Our findings show that ethical and UX-oriented considerations are deeply intertwined and often require context-sensitive application. We document a systematic, multi-method problem analysis that uses these principle areas as an analytic artifact to examine why existing recommendations cannot be directly transferred to AI companion contexts.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.14236
Arabic large-language-model (LLM) evaluation has matured around Modern Standard Arabic (MSA): aggregated leaderboards such as the Open Arabic LLM Leaderboard (OALL), HELM Arabic, and BALSAM rank models across dozens of MSA tasks, and frontier systems increasingly saturate them. Dialectal Arabic, the language Iraqis actually speak, remains nearly invisible to this infrastructure. We introduce Mizan ("the balance"), Iraq's national benchmark for evaluating LLMs on Iraqi Arabic and the Iraqi civic context: an MSA baseline track paired with an Iraqi track across six axes (dialect comprehension, dialect generation, bidirectional MSA-Iraqi translation, Iraq-specific knowledge, official-document field extraction, and safety), built from 340 originally authored, dually reviewed items with statistically audited answer positions and Wilson intervals on every published score. A pilot evaluation of 27 systems, spanning closed frontier models three days after release, open weights across size tiers, and an Arabic trio of commercial, open-specialized, and sovereign systems, yields four findings. The MSA track saturates while the Iraqi track discriminates, with a consistent 14-18-point per-model gap and statistically tied leaders. Official-document extraction confines every system to 32-56. Arabic-focused specialization behaves as MSA specialization: two dedicated Arabic models score below a size-matched generalist on the Iraqi track. And the safety-hardened tier of the newest model family deterministically refuses innocuous dialect-comprehension items as policy violations, an over-refusal mode invisible to MSA benchmarks. The platform enforces an integrity protocol of immutable snapshots, verification certificates, a human publication gate, and public retraction, all exercised during this study. Code and the public development set accompany the paper.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13980
Pharmaceutical sales forecasts inform planning across products, regions, and distribution channels, yet their interpretation depends on inventory availability, transaction semantics, product lifecycle, and the information available when each forecast is issued. A model prediction alone does not preserve these conditions or establish whether a forecast is suitable for operational use. We present Phorecaster365, a human-supervised reference architecture that connects enterprise resource planning data to reviewable pharmaceutical sales forecasts. The architecture separates source ingestion, product-region series construction, temporally valid feature generation, statistical and machine-learning modeling, ensemble formation, uncertainty assessment, planner review, and lifecycle governance. Its central intermediate representation is a forecast context package that preserves the source snapshot, forecast target, temporal cutoff, available covariates, data-quality state, and hierarchy version. A corresponding forecast evidence package links predictions to model and calibration versions, exceptions, human adjustments, and publication history. Development experience with a synthetic panel of 10,950 daily records across 30 product-region series informs the design. Historical experiment summaries are retained only as descriptive evidence of development because their evaluation does not establish independent predictive validity. We specify a rolling-origin evaluation protocol, baseline and ablation requirements, uncertainty and robustness assessments, and a staged pathway from synthetic testing to use in governed planning. The contribution is an implementation-neutral system design and validation framework; the report does not establish real-world forecasting accuracy, comparative superiority, or operational benefit.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13907
Reinforcement learning trading systems published in the academic literature overwhelmingly rely on price-aggregate state representations (OHLCV bars) or limit-order-book depth features, leaving microstructure pattern theories from the practitioner literature, namely Auction Market Theory and Market Profile, without a peer-reviewed computational instantiation. We present ViperQ, a reinforcement learning system whose state representation is built explicitly from Auction Market Theory primitives: Volume Point of Control, Value Area position, Low Volume Node flags, Cumulative Volume Delta divergence, and tape-velocity signatures, assembled into a 20-dimensional Z-normalised vector. Two Proximal Policy Optimisation agents are trained with a prospect theory-grounded asymmetric reward function that penalises losing holds at a magnitude consistent with Kahneman and Tversky's loss-aversion coefficient. Evaluated on a held-out twelve-month partition of institutional tick data the agents have never seen, ViperQ achieves +163.6% ROI on TSLA (-27.5% max drawdown, 27,019 trades) and +116.5% ROI on NVDA (-47.8% max drawdown, 12,892 trades) under zero leverage. The results establish Auction Market Theory features as a tractable structured input modality for sequential decision-making on financial time series and motivate further work on microstructure-aware policy learning.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13825
Online reviews shape consumer decisions, platform governance, and corporate this http URL reviews compromise this information channel by injecting deceptive evidence into rating systems, recommendation pipelines, and public trust this http URL rise of large language models, or LLMs, has changed the problem in two this http URL can generate fluent and context-aware deceptive reviews, while pre-trained language models, or PLMs, and LLMs also provide stronger semantic representations for this http URL survey reviews fake review detection from an information fusion perspective, covering 211 studies published from 2018 to early this http URL organize existing work by evidence source and fusion level, covering review text, sentiment, rating behavior, temporal metadata, user-product graphs, multimodal content, external knowledge, and LLM-generated this http URL trace the development from traditional machine learning and deep learning to PLM-based and LLM-based methods, and examine how different approaches combine textual, behavioral, structural, and multimodal this http URL also analyze reported performance trends on widely used Amazon, Yelp, and OpSpam benchmark families, while noting the limitations caused by different label construction procedures, data splits, and evaluation this http URL, we identify open problems in adversarial generation, cross-domain transfer, uncertainty-aware fusion, missing-source robustness, interpretability, and trustworthy evaluation for AI-generated deceptive content.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.30292
The transition from passive foundation models to autonomous, goal-directed agentic AI systems has introduced unprecedented capabilities by coupling recursive cognitive reasoning loops, persistent memory architectures, live tool execution planes, and multi-agent collaboration topologies. However, granting probabilistic neural cores execution authority across filesystems, networks, and cloud infrastructure dissolves classical security perimeters: natural language simultaneously serves as input data, internal control code, and communication protocols, exposing a Turing-complete blast radius where untrusted data represents executable instructions. This survey delivers a comprehensive systems-security reference framework for trustworthy agentic AI, synthesizing 206 foundational studies and regulatory standards. We formalize the general agent architecture as a stateful 5-tuple and establish a 6-dimensional trustworthiness taxonomy covering security, safety, privacy, explainability, fairness, and accountability. We systematically analyze threat surfaces across intra-execution loops and interaction planes, formulate a multi-layered zero-trust defense-in-depth architecture integrating Dual-LLM isolation, Capability-Based Access Control, kernel eBPF probes, and sandboxed runtimes, review standardized evaluation benchmarks, and map technical controls to international AI governance frameworks.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13731
Accurate cell segmentation remains a major bottleneck in subcellular spatial transcriptomics (SST), in which morphological images and spatially resolved RNA transcripts are used to partition tissues into individual cellular instances. As segmentation serves as the foundation for constructing cell-level representations, boundary errors can lead to incorrect transcript assignments and compromise downstream analyses. However, reliable ground-truth boundaries are unavailable because they must be inferred from incomplete morphological and transcript signals. Furthermore, manual annotation of a large number of cells is time-consuming. Agreement among complementary segmentation methods provides a practical surrogate for identifying well-supported and ambiguous regions, but explicit consensus construction requires executing multiple computationally intensive pipelines. In this study, we propose MARC (Morphology-Aware Regression of Consensus), a framework that predicts a multi-method consensus-support map for SST segmentation. MARC is trained with leave-one-method-out consensus pseudo-targets and a Foreground-Union Consensus Loss that focuses supervision on candidate and consensus foreground. We evaluated MARC on 4,642 held-out tiles from Xenium kidney tissue, achieving a mean Dice score of 0.90, a mean intersection-over-union of 0.82, and a mean cell-level Spearman correlation of 0.79 against explicitly computed cross-method consensus maps. We demonstrate that the predicted consensus maps localise weakly supported regions while preserving consensus-based rankings and identifying low-consensus cells for manual review. These results show that MARC closely approximates explicit cross-method consensus without multi-method inference and therefore has the potential to facilitate robust, consensus-aware evaluation of cell segmentation in large-scale SST studies.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13665
We report a multi-month engineering program to build Sophea, a production bilingual Greek-English automatic speech recognition system. We evaluate the system against nine production gates covering Greek and English word error rate, language identification, and hallucinations on non-speech audio. Across twenty-three training iterations and two model architectures, no training-data composition passed all nine gates simultaneously. Meeting the Greek noisy-environment target required about 1,500 steps of dense domain exposure, while preserving English language identification tolerated only about 250 steps, or about 1,250 with a rebalanced mix that reduced Greek accuracy. We describe a six-stage data pipeline in which calibrating an audio-quality filter against in-domain anchors reduced the discarded share of scored Greek audio from 98.7 percent to 10.6 percent. A pre-registered ablation isolated a hallucination defect to one training-data package. A three-model ROVER ensemble increased gate coverage from 4-7 of 9 for individual models to 9 of 9 and reduced overlapping-speech WER from 53.35 percent to 37.87 percent, a 29 percent relative improvement. A separate learned per-clip arbiter over two models is listed as sophea/asr-k1 (preview) on the public Open ASR Leaderboard, with 4.26 percent average WER across eight public English test sets, and reaches 25.88 percent WER on live Greek noisy-environment traffic. We also document five cases in which a measurement tool produced a plausible but incorrect result and seven substantial approaches that were evaluated but not shipped. No model weights or training data are released; we report methodology and quantitative results only.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13498
Existing pipelines for clinical timeline extraction from case reports are evaluated using an expert reference and are limited by imperfect reference annotations and imprecise event alignment. We developed GAVEL, an LLM judge protocol that compares two timelines with the case report and returns a discrepancy type, verdict, and report passage for each difference. We evaluated the event matcher, reviewed 2,738 findings from GPT5.6sol and DeepSeek V3.2, ranked six LLM extractors and two human annotators, and tested GAVEL guided merging. True match rates were 60% immediately below and 48% immediately above the 0.10 cutoff. Manual review confirmed 89.4% and 88.6% of findings. Across 126 reports, merged timelines were preferred in 77.0% of comparisons (95% CI, 69.8 to 84.1%) and reduced discrepancies attributed to the evaluated timeline from 7.63 to 0.85 per report. GAVEL supports report-based comparison and revision without treating either timeline as ground truth.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13475
The increasing deployment of AI agents in long-horizon tasks yields massive execution logs. Diagnosing failures within these records is crucial for reliability, as it transforms outcome-level signals into actionable interventions. The sheer scale of the data renders human review impractical, driving the need for automated root-cause attribution (RCA). However, automated RCA methods using LLMs suffer from low diagnostic accuracy, especially as execution traces grow larger. They struggle because relevant information is often sparse, distributed across distant actions, and disconnected from the visible failure, reducing root-cause attribution to a massive search problem. Existing RCA methods typically rely on one-shot LLM judgments to diagnose failures from execution traces. While effective for shorter trajectories, these judges tend to settle on a plausible diagnosis early, leaving critical evidence in longer traces unexamined. We introduce Continual Search, an iterative framework that nudges the judge, over successive turns, to keep searching for unresolved diagnostic evidence. We evaluate Continual Search across four existing RCA benchmarks. Recognizing the lack of massive execution traces in current benchmarks, we introduce MegaRCA-Mix to evaluate RCA at scale. MegaRCA-Mix provides a challenging testbed of 50 human-annotated failure trials spanning long-horizon, execution-heavy tasks. Across multiple benchmark suites and model families, Continual Search consistently improves attribution performance. On MegaRCA-Mix, for example, it improves GPT-5.5's F1 score by more than 40\%, from $0.349$ to $0.498$. More interestingly, within the same model family, lower-tier models can even surpass their higher-tier counterparts, demonstrating that effective search supersedes raw model scale.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13463
Agent skills are reusable units for language-model agents, but their risks emerge through model decisions, user context, tool calls, and execution feedback rather than through stable signatures or a single sandbox run. Existing static, dynamic, and benchmark-style evaluations rarely preserve public evidence that can be inspected, searched, and reused. We present SkillAtlas, a hosted attack trace library that converts private agent-skill security report bundles into reviewed, redacted, and searchable public cases. The library contains 3,014 cases, 6,589 traces, 151,131 steps, 233 affected skills, and 8 risk categories; 42.5% of successful cases first become successful after a non-success initial round, and trajectory-grounded labels improve pre-execution guard accuracy to 0.770.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13353
As a key model compression technique, knowledge distillation aims to transfer knowledge from a high-capacity teacher model to a lightweight student model for enhancing the latter's performance. In this work, we reviewed the feature knowledge distillation for 3D-CNNs and observed that most feature distillation methods in video analysis are simple adaptations of those used in image analysis, often neglecting the differences of video features in the temporal dimension. To address this issue, we proposed Label-Guided Knowledge Distillation (LGKD) to guide the distillation of student model features using ground truth labels. Our method entails two components: sample-wise distillation and class-wise distillation, enabling the student model to learn feature representation of the teacher model at two levels. Sample-wise distillation utilizes label information and the teacher's probability distribution to guide the learning of features that significantly impact temporal accuracy while mitigating noise. Meanwhile, class-wise feature distillation employs a prototype network to further capture the relational knowledge among samples within the same category, enhancing the student's ability to learn higher-dimensional semantic information and improving model generalization. To demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of our method, we conducted comprehensive experiments on two benchmark action recognition datasets, UCF101 and HMDB51, achieving competitive results.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13024
We developed DAMM-Net++, a 2.5D architecture for thoracic OAR and target volume segmentation that addresses three persistent challenges in radiotherapy auto-contouring: inter-slice surface incoherence, systematic failure on small low-contrast targets, and the absence of per-case reliability signals. The central component is an anatomy-change-aware bidirectional selective state-space memory that models through-plane anatomical change and selectively propagates context along the axial slice sequence. A boundary-aware decoder sharpens near-surface predictions, and an uncertainty head provides calibrated per-voxel confidence for clinical triage. We evaluated 2,146 patients across four centers, an independent external cohort of 112 patients, and a multicenter reader study involving 17 radiation oncologists on 150 cases. The model achieves a mean Dice of 0.955 and HD95 of 3.78 mm, with the largest gains on low-contrast organs-at-risk (OARs) and target volumes where through-plane context is most critical. The uncertainty head is well-calibrated and supports case-level triage. In the reader study, AI assistance reduced contouring time by 75-80 percent across experience levels and raised junior-reader IoU from 0.861 to 0.925, matching the unedited model. External validation showed a modest internal-to-external drop (less than 5 percent) with calibrated uncertainty transferring without recalibration. The complete deployment pipeline from DICOM ingestion to TPS-compatible RTSTRUCT export has been integrated into the clinical workflow at a partner hospital, where it is used to assist with contouring. These results suggest that anatomically motivated inter-slice memory, paired with uncertainty-guided review, offers a clinically viable path for thoracic auto-contouring.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.16036
AI-assisted writing can flatten meaning in human storytelling, enabling the production of homogeneous outputs without the intentional effort and sense-making writing entails. To address this challenge, we present The House with a Million Windows (HWAMW), an LLM-based interactive fiction system designed to help users explore both the breadth and depth of potential meanings within their personal stories -- drawing on a psychological paradigm called the restorying intervention. In HWAMW, users play through a text-based narrative in which they tell a story, then encounter a set of LLM-generated "windows" reframing it according to different literary styles. Empirical evidence shows that HWAMW increases users' sense of narrative identity, while an expert review explores how this effect is achieved. Our findings suggest that HWAMW facilitates restorying and offers a valuable paradigm for AI-assisted writing, wherein LLMs do not tell our stories but rather help us see greater potential in the stories we tell.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12537
Large language models are being organized into multi-agent systems with specialized roles, but whether such specialization produces distinct forecasts and whether subsequent synthesis improves utility remains unclear. In this study, we carried out a live, prospective evaluation over the final 56 matches of the information-dense 2026 FIFA World Cup, keeping a frontier foundation model constant while assigning two primary forecasting agents contrasting specialist roles: a quantitative specialist focusing on structured performance statistics and a news specialist focusing on current injuries, tactics and information from press conferences. Their forecasts were then reviewed by a separate critic before being combined by a meta-agent, resulting in a sequential four-agent model. Forecasts from the betting market served as an external benchmark. The news specialist obtained the highest mean probability-weighted Top-3 utility and matched the betting market in Top-3 exact-score hits. Nevertheless, the two specialist forecasters agreed on at least two of the three scorelines in 50 out of 56 matches, and the meta-agent never generated more than one scoreline outside the specialists' forecast set. These findings show that rapidly changing, unstructured information can provide a valuable forecasting signal alongside structured statistics, whereas adding critic and meta-agent stages does not necessarily create complementary information or improve on the strongest specialist.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.12495