Dialog
-
TARSphere: A Robot-Oriented Full-Stack Framework for Long-Horizon Embodied Agents in Evolving Physical and Social Environments
2026-10-21 17:02:52Yicheng Xu, Zhikai Xu, Ziyuan Chen, Yuhang Dong, Tao Zhang, Zhucun Xue, Yong Liu, Jiangning ZhangAbstract
Robots must act under physical and social constraints while adapting to changes in their environment and human needs. Existing embodied-agent systems often focus on specified goals or abstract execution into symbolic actions, limiting evaluation in an evolving world. We introduce TARSphere, a robot-oriented full-stack framework for physically and socially grounded long-horizon embodied agents. TARSphere-Infra runs robot policies in a physics simulator with embodied NPCs and constrained dialogue. An event-driven finite-state machine (FSM) uses completed actions and delivered information to update task states and evaluate outcomes. TARSphere-Harness, its embodied brain harness, lets a frozen multimodal large language model (MLLM) act through multi-level executable skills, using observations, hierarchical memory, and execution feedback to revise its decisions. On this foundation, agent-in-the-loop curation aligns task semantics, causal dependencies, and scene geometry to construct TARSphere-Bench: 360 episodes across 30 indoor scenes. Five paired conditions assess perceptual robustness, disruption adaptation, task update, human coordination, and intent understanding for navigate-and-report and fetch-and-deliver tasks. Our evaluation of 8 MLLMs shows that general-purpose models can outperform embodied models, while task updates and human interaction remain difficult. Frequent collisions and falls further motivate evaluating execution safety alongside task success, even with a shared action interface and decision budget.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30043
PDF
-
Multi-level Encoder with Global Topic for Task-oriented Dialogue Summarization
2026-10-21 02:41:38Zhuoqi He, Peijie Huang, Yuhong Xu, Youming Peng, Mingzhi Xu, Xinyang LinAbstract
Task-oriented dialogue summarization aims to automatically extract key information to generate domain summaries to improve service efficiency and quality. Task-oriented dialogue is inherently logical and surrounds specific topic. How to effectively capture the dialogue topic and the most salient information becomes one of the major challenges of this task. In this paper, we propose a task-oriented dialogue summarization model utilizing a multi-level encoder with global topic (MLEGT). This model discovers temporal and spatial dependencies through a multi-level encoder, while simultaneously obtaining a simple yet effective global topic in the process of graph construction. It not only captures the crucial details but also breaks the long-range limit and discover the intrinsic structure across the dialogue. Then, a global topic guided pointer mechanism is added into the summrizer to capture ignored but important information, which is helpful to improve the accuracy of the summary. A comprehensive study of two public datasets, including a real-world large-scale Chinese police interrogation dataset and a medical reporting service dataset proves the superiority of our method on several strong baselines.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29097
PDF
-
DiaLong: Benchmarking Reminiscence in Long-Context Dialogues
2026-10-20 19:55:41Owen Bianchi, Samer Aslan, Ryunosuke SaitoAbstract
How well can transformer-based Large Language Models (LLMs) retain and recall memories in long contexts of dialogue? LLMs are known to forget long-range factual information in their context, yet the field lacks a comprehensive benchmark to quantitatively assess these shortcomings. We present DiaLong, a long-context dialogue dataset and accompanying memory task that standardizes evaluation in this space. It consists of 100 unique conversations created by humans and then augmented with LLMs, extending beyond lengths found in existing datasets. Our selected memory task is fact recall: classify 40 candidate facts about a dialogue as true or false. This task directly probes the model's ability to actively retain and retrieve information, serving as a critical measure of memory within extended conversational contexts. In testing both the latest LLMs and proposed memory enhancements on DiaLong, we demonstrate that more work needs to be done to enable LLMs with better memory performance. By enhancing memory capabilities, LLMs can improve in maintaining coherence, relevance, and human-like interaction over extended conversation. Improving these capabilities will help LLMs fulfill diverse user needs and expectations in various conversational scenarios.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.25463
PDF
-
To Manipulate or Not: Opinion Dynamics in LLM Interactions
2026-10-20 19:48:20Mohammad Siahkamari, Phuoc Dat Nguyen, Stephen MacNeilAbstract
Large language models increasingly take part in extended conversations where they can both shape and be shaped by another party's views, yet most persuasion research measures only one side of that exchange. We introduce a controlled LLM-LLM debate framework in which two language-model roles repeatedly discuss a contested topic (climate-change attribution): one is given an assigned stance and, in some conditions, an explicit instruction to persuade, while the other receives no assigned position. Across four ordered model combinations involving GPT-6 Luna and Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite, we track both each role's explicitly reported position and a separate measure of its turn-by-turn behavior inside the conversation. Opinion dynamics differ substantially across model combinations: same-model interactions narrow the opinion gap on average, clearly for only one of the two models, while cross-model interactions widen it. Explicit reports and in-dialogue behavior capture distinct aspects of opinion dynamics, and a blanket instruction to persuade does not reliably increase influence. These findings suggest that conversational influence depends not only on assigned roles and initial positions but also on the participating models, with implications for how opinion change is measured in extended LLM interactions.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28875
PDF
-
StreamEval: Evaluating Interactive Streaming Video Generation Models
Abstract
As streaming video generation advances, enabling real-time interaction with generated video is becoming increasingly important. We introduce StreamEval, a unified benchmark for interactive streaming video generation spanning five tasks: avatar dialogue, avatar performance, world generation, instruction editing, and reference editing. StreamEval comprises 300 scripted test cases lasting 15-300s, each specifying initial assets, incrementally arriving multimodal requests, and explicit requirements for state changes and content preservation. Performance is assessed along four evaluation dimensions: task execution, state consistency, visual fidelity, and audiovisual coordination, instantiated through ten task-specific metrics on a 0-100 scale. Evaluating 37 distinct models across 300 test cases, we find that high visual quality and identity retention do not necessarily coincide with reliable request execution or sustained state consistency. In particular, request execution remains challenging: the highest task-specific scores are 36.90 for Following among seven avatar-performance models, 25.93 for Following in text-conditioned world generation, and 15.00 for Edit Success among three reported reference-editing models. These findings identify reliable request execution under timing and preservation constraints as a central challenge for advancing omni-modal real-time interactive systems. The leaderboard is available at this https URL
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28402
PDF
-
Disclosure Begets Disclosure: A Self-Reinforcing Privacy Loop in LLM Agents with Persistent Memory
2026-10-20 14:52:57Masahiro Kaneko, Hiromi Arai, Timothy BaldwinAbstract
Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly use persistent memory to personalize responses, and personal attributes in this memory pose a privacy risk if exposed. We ask how consulting memory during dialogue changes what users go on to say, and thus what the memory comes to reveal. In multi-session simulations, a simulated user with 24 personal attributes talks with a support agent that does or does not consult memory, and in both settings attributes are inferred from the full accumulated record. Across four support models, memory raises response quality but also empirical leakage, the share of attribute values correctly inferred from the record, by a margin that widens over sessions. The cause is a loop in ordinary, non-adversarial assistance. Memory-conditioned responses carry earlier values forward, often as presuppositions, and users affirm them or leave them uncorrected, so that cues and the agent's own guesses become recorded values. The loop reinforces itself, and removing the agent's mentions of an attribute lowers its later disclosure about twice as much as single-turn effects predict. Users cannot leave it on their own, since correcting a value discloses the attribute, declining to discuss it shifts later predictions toward sensitive values, and incorrect values left in place become entrenched. The loop is best weakened at the agent's response. Instructing the agent not to state or presuppose attributes brings leakage to about the no-memory level while keeping most of the quality gains, whereas filtering or anonymizing what users say or what is stored gives up much of them.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28315
PDF
-
Reading Too Much Into It? Interpretive Preferences and Commitment in LLM Mentalisation under Ambiguity
2026-10-20 12:18:11Stephanie Fong, Yiwen Jiang, Qingyang Xu, Zimu Wang, Yaling Shen, Xiangyu Zhao, Jiahe Liu, Yinghao Zhang, Vincent Lee, Dominic DwyerAbstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for interpersonal advice, potentially shaping how users interpret ambiguous social encounters. Existing Theory of Mind evaluations typically rely on predefined answers, while uncertainty research overlooks LLMs' preferred explanations and confidence under psychological distress. To address these gaps, we introduce MentalLoom, a novel evaluation of LLM mentalisation comprising 604 ambiguous social episodes, matched depression and social anxiety disclosures, and four-turn dialogues with unchanged event evidence. Across eight LLMs, disclosures initially elicited more negative explanations overall but more positive narrator-directed interpretations. Scripted repeated questioning showed greater emotional support, stronger positive narrator-directed endorsement, and higher certainty without new event evidence. These findings show that user context can reshape interpretive preferences and commitment while the underlying ambiguity remains unresolved.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28105
PDF
-
From Encoding to Generation: Towards Empathetic Large Language Models
2026-10-20 04:10:24Samhita Bollepally, Takashi Yamauchi, Marissa WestAbstract
Empathetic interaction involves two distinguishable capacities: representing another person's emotional state (cognitive empathy) and generating an appropriate response to that state (affective empathy). We apply this distinction to examine how emotion-related information is internally organized, selectively attended to, and carried through response generation in Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct across 10 emotion categories from the EmpatheticDialogues dataset. Layer-wise linear probing revealed a broad middle-layer region of peak emotion-category decodability, with the layer-11 L2 probe achieving 63.6% held-out accuracy against a 10% chance level and a 54.6% TF-IDF lexical baseline. During response generation, emotion-related user tokens received 1.89 times as much attention per token as other utterance tokens, concentrated across layers 10-15. Target-emotion alignment then decreased from a mean cosine similarity of 0.239 for input representations to 0.125 for generated responses, with positive drift in 77% of examples and the largest shifts for angry and furious. Emotion-category representation, attention allocation, and response-level alignment therefore emerge as distinguishable components of model processing that can be analyzed through a functional cognitive-affective empathy framework. These findings provide a foundation for monitoring emotion representations during generation and leveraging models' existing affective structure to support more naturally empathetic responses without relying on external prompting or explicit emotion conditioning.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27603
PDF
-
AudiPsy: Evidence-Grounded Multimodal Reasoning over Spoken Counseling Conversations for Depression Assessment
2026-10-20 03:31:15Chuanbo Zhu, Run Luo, Weibo Zhao, Yue Li, Kun Qian, Qiang Qu, Yike Guo, Minghuan Tan, Wei XueAbstract
Depression assessment from counseling speech requires integrating textual and acoustic psychological evidence across turns, yet existing end-to-end classification approaches lack explicit multimodal evidence interpretation and context-aware reasoning. We propose AudiPsy, an evidence-grounded omni-LLM for depression assessment over spoken counseling conversations. AudiPsy employs an Observation-Assessment-Summary (OAS) paradigm to integrate dialogue transcripts, textual and acoustic emotions, and textual-acoustic emotion incongruence into structured reasoning. OAS incrementally organizes multimodal observations, performs contextualized assessment, and maintains an evolving dialogue summary for subsequent turns. To support this framework, we construct AudiPsy-Counsel, a synthetic spoken counseling conversation corpus with multimodal context augmentation, and develop a unified three-stage curriculum for depression-oriented reasoning. Experiments on DAIC-WOZ demonstrate superior depression assessment performance over specialized depression detection methods and general-purpose speech/omni-LLMs, along with improved reasoning quality, while supplementary evaluation on EATD-Corpus supports AudiPsy's applicability to naturalistic conversations.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27567
PDF
-
HABIT-Bench: Evaluating Habit Induction from Longitudinal Weak Evidence in Agent Memory
2026-10-20 03:24:12Junming Zhang, Rubin Wei, Xu Cheng, Hao Sun, Jiarui Wang, Ruoxi Cheng, Xiquan Wang, Peisong Wu, Mingsong Chen, Zhouhan LinAbstract
In long-term interactions with large language model (LLM) agents, users reveal habits through their choices and actions. These habits capture implicit user information that agents must infer across conversations. However, individual observations may provide only partial evidence about a habit or when it applies. Retaining past interactions alone does not ensure that agents can infer habits and apply them appropriately. We introduce HABIT-Bench to evaluate how well agent memory systems infer habits from weak evidence and apply them to later requests. We construct synthetic user histories from task-oriented dialogue data and controlled habit graphs. The histories span hundreds of sessions across food, finance, software, and travel. Four-choice tasks assess agents' ability to infer user habits and apply them appropriately. They include temporary exceptions, changes in habits, and suggestions that users have not accepted. Sampled tasks undergo independent human review. We evaluate eight memory methods with Qwen3-235B-A22B and GLM-5.3-Flash. The best-performing memory method achieves 33.61\% macro accuracy across the four domains. Performance remains limited even when annotated evidence is supplied directly. These results expose a persistent gap between access to past interactions and the ability to infer and appropriately use user habits.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.24520
PDF
-
EviDial: When Correct Depression Predictions Lack Evidence
2026-10-20 02:56:09Junjie Xu, Jin Zhu, Yuzhe Yang, Luhan Wang, Xingjiao Wu, Daoguo Dong, Jing Yang, Wenxin Wu, Liang HeAbstract
Depression dialogue benchmarks commonly assess models by comparing predicted symptom labels with clinical scale scores. However, a prediction may agree with a benchmark label even when the dialogue lacks enough evidence to justify it. We introduce EviDial, a benchmark that distinguishes label agreement from evidence-grounded assessment. EviDial comprises 382 depression dialogues from three sources and 2,744 participant-symptom cells, each classified as having absent, partial, conflicting, or sufficient evidence. Because evidence sufficiency lacks a directly observable gold standard, we derive calibrated evidence references from multiple judgments using generalizability theory, many-facet Rasch measurement, and random-effects latent class analysis. Our audit reveals that 82.8% of participant-symptom cells lack sufficient textual evidence for the corresponding symptom assessment, with substantial variation across sources. Across model families and prompting strategies, 69.2%-96.9% of predictions judged correct by benchmark labels are nonetheless unsupported by sufficient dialogue evidence. Further analyses show that strong agreement among LLM evaluators need not reflect independent evidence judgments, underscoring the need to calibrate automated reference panels. These findings demonstrate that label-based evaluation can overestimate evidence-grounded performance by conflating agreement with clinical labels and support in the observed dialogue. EviDial provides a measurement layer for separating these constructs and auditing LLM-based depression assessment more faithfully.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27541
PDF
-
Looking Into The Past: The Impact of Context on Detecting Deceptive Statements
2026-10-19 23:59:31Alex Clay, Ernesto Jimenez-Ruiz, Pranava MadhyasthaAbstract
Deception detection typically considers messages in isolation. Previous works in claim verification and role detection have displayed that additional information such as gameplay history is crucial to successful predictions. In this work, we demonstrate the value of preceding gameplay dialogue when applied to deceptive message detection within the hidden role game of Avalon. The findings show that LLMs can see improvement across a number of metrics, including accuracy by up to 31\% with the addition of gameplay context for the target message.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27407
PDF
-
Beyond Two Tracks: Speaker-Anchored Full-Duplex Dialogue Recovery
2026-10-19 18:09:47Yuxuan Chen, Yang Xiao, Jack Sun, Chak Sun, Brick Li, SamAbstract
Spoken interaction is moving from alternating turns to full-duplex conversation, where an agent listens while speaking. Learning this coordination requires natural dialogue with persistent speaker-resolved tracks, a data requirement that remains difficult to satisfy at scale. Generative recovery offers a route from ordinary recordings, but recovering two voices is not enough: their track assignments can drift as the conversation unfolds. We address this missing link with speaker-anchored routing before diffusion: a 1.84M-parameter module matches the separator's coarse streams to fixed enrollment identities and orders them before a frozen generator reconstructs the speech, without retraining the generator or altering the reconstructed audio. On 25-minute remote conversations, routing cuts wrong-track time from 43.9% to 4.1%, below the 6.2% of matched-enrollment waveform re-identification, with its largest advantage when one participant holds the floor (17.8% versus 28.6%), and raises fixed-track activity F1 from 0.46 to 0.84 while per-chunk reconstruction quality is unchanged. The same router transfers to unseen face-to-face and telephone recordings, and a margin-gated verification step brings their wrong-track time to 0.9-1.7% while embedding 20-36% of the output, where full re-identification embeds all of it. Recovered voices thus become the participant-consistent tracks that full-duplex dialogue modeling needs. Audio examples: this https URL
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27109
PDF
-
LightCRS: Lightweight Multi-Domain Conversational Recommendation System
2026-10-18 07:11:04He Ma, Lan You, Qiyang Wu, Chen LiuAbstract
Conversational recommender systems have recently adopted vision-language models to match user dialogue intents with multimodal product information. However, extending these methods to many product domains faces a dilemma: deploying a separately adapted VLM per domain scales cost linearly with the number of domains and requires routing each dialogue to the right model, while naively merging all domains into a single VLM degrades accuracy because product characteristics vary widely across categories. We propose LightCRS, a lightweight, query-conditioned framework for unified multi-domain multimodal conversational recommendation. LightCRS precomputes multimodal product representations once offline with frozen encoders. Online, a compact 5.3M-parameter module fuses this evidence for each dialogue via query-conditioned cross-attention, whose parameters are shared across all domains, and compares candidates jointly with an inter-candidate Transformer. To enable rigorous evaluation, we construct MM-R2A-25, a 25-domain benchmark pairing natural Reddit recommendation-seeking conversations with Amazon product listings. LightCRS achieves state-of-the-art average HR@1, NDCG@5, and MRR, improving HR@1 by 35.4\% over the strongest baseline while reducing per-query latency by 266 times. Joint multi-domain training itself improves HR@1 by 15.2\% over separately trained single-domain models.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26948
PDF
-
Jarvis: Coordination Deserves a Brain of Its Own in Agentic Interactive Models
2026-10-16 17:29:10Yuxiang Wang, Shengbo Cai, Zhixian Zhao, Yingda Shen, Yuancheng Wang, Xueyao Zhang, Liqiang Zhang, Teddy Sun, Steve Yves, Zhizheng WuAbstract
Interactive models increasingly hand complex reasoning and tool use to a slow brain in the background, leaving a realtime front model free to sustain full-duplex dialogue. Yet the user may refine, cancel or replace a request while its task runs, so a plan or result that made sense a moment ago goes stale. Each new utterance must therefore be read against the work in flight, but the front model follows only the conversation and the back end sees only its own task. Coordination deserves a brain of its own, one that sees both. We introduce Jarvis, a coordination harness where models judge and code enforces. Its typed decision model, JEV, reads each turn against the live tasks and picks among operations built from a versioned task record. Code checks every choice against the current state before applying it, so no decision can act on a task version the user has replaced. Jarvis also rechecks plans before they execute and results before they are spoken, and counts an answer as delivered only once the user has heard it in full. We build two instances of this design. Jarvis-Audio runs unchanged on three full-duplex speech models. Jarvis-Omni adds vision and rechecks the evidence behind an answer before and during playback, since a scene can change while nobody speaks. With the front model and back end held fixed, replacing Qwen Audio Agent with Jarvis raises tau-Voice task success more than sixfold, from 29 to 192 of 278 tasks, and the gains hold on every benchmark and front model. Against published systems, Jarvis-Audio reaches 69% Pass1 on Full-Duplex-Bench v3 with an open 9B front model, versus 60% for GPT-Realtime. These results suggest that how the two brains are coordinated matters as much as how strong they are.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23804
PDF
-
SIT-Eval: Situation-Based Interactive Turn-by-Turn Evaluation of Conversational Agents
2026-10-16 15:24:02Ravil Mussabayev, Saveliy Zavertyaev, Dmitriy Parpulov, Andrey SavchenkoAbstract
The rapid proliferation of conversational AI agents necessitates evaluation methods that assess performance across diverse dialogue scenarios, utilizing multiple situational criteria, as appropriate behavior depends on context and encompasses various aspects. Existing dialogue benchmarks typically use static natural conversations, which underrepresent rare situations---a critical safety gap, as low-probability events become frequent failures at production scale. However, limited sample sizes force a choice: either maintain natural dialogues for realism or turn to adaptive situation sampling for comprehensive yet statistically reliable coverage. We introduce SIT-Eval, an adjustable framework for evaluating situation-based conversational agents. We formalize an agent's desired behavior as situational rules: if situation is P, follow rules Q. At each conversation turn, an LLM-interlocutor enacts a uniformly sampled situation. A context-aware LLM-judge leverages all conditionally applicable rules as criteria to evaluate the agent's reply for that situation. The judge is validated using human-verified synthetic golden dialogues. Benchmarking 8 LLMs on 1292 conversation turns reveals failure modes hidden by aggregate metrics: models with similar overall scores vary widely in their adherence to individual rules. All models struggle most with ambiguity clarification and Socratic questioning.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23612
PDF
-
PersonaCUABench: Benchmarking Computer-Use Agents Serving Diverse Personas
2026-10-16 06:14:55Haoming Li, Defu Cao, Xu Hu, Yingtao Luo, Yiyang Wang, Xianghe Xu, Jiashu He, Wanting Jiang, Yifan Zhang, Yunhan Zhao, Siyang Wu, Chen Yang, Haixin Wang, Zheyuan Deng, Taoran Li, Jingwen Zhang, Zhejian Peng, Shushu Liang, Yue Zhao, Bingzhe Li, Feng Chen, Yifan Wang, Jintao Huang, Yijun Wang, Yuexing Hao, Xiaomin LiAbstract
Computer-use agents (CUAs) are commonly evaluated against fixed task specifications, but users may omit requirements, add constraints, or require approval before consequential actions. Completing the benchmark instruction does not guarantee serving the person who asked. We introduce PersonaCUABench, which holds 74 tasks across 11 domains fixed and varies only who asks. A persona agent, playing one of 44 personas in four groups, rewrites each instruction in that user's own words and answers the CUA's questions, while the CUA sees only the dialogue, never the profile or the original instruction. Across nine backbones (3,330 runs), mean task completion falls by 36% relative to the original requests. The losses have two sources: in 59.9% of cells that lose points, the agent engages with what the user asked for and still gets it wrong, and 11.2% are stops the user requested that the checker scores as failures. Even when a persona request is fully completed, the user gives the top satisfaction rating in only 62.7% of cells, against 84.1% for the original requests. CUAs should therefore be evaluated not only on task completion but also on whether they meet the requirements and constraints users express. Code: this https URL. Project page: this https URL
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22990
PDF
-
What Shapes Brain Alignment of Large Language Models during Dialogue? Insights from Language Production and Comprehension
2026-10-16 05:34:33Yuko Nakagi, Yuya Chiba, Yasue KishinoAbstract
Brain alignment of large language models (LLMs) offers a way to investigate representational similarities between LLMs and the human brain during language processing. While previous studies have mainly focused on passive language comprehension, little is known about such alignment during dialogue, in which speakers engage in both language production and comprehension. In this study, using fMRI data collected during dialogue, we examine brain alignment during language production and comprehension across LLM layers and brain regions. We assess its association with the intrinsic dimension (ID) of LLM representations and the contributions of several interpretable linguistic and communicative features. Our results reveal distinct patterns of brain alignment between production and comprehension, as well as strong associations with ID in brain regions associated with each processing mode. Furthermore, we show that the contributions of linguistic and communicative features also vary across processing modes, LLM layers, and brain regions.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22961
PDF
-
ASR-Style Transcript Normalization Removes Useful Pragmatic Signal for Dialogue Act Classification
2026-10-16 04:51:37Lucky Onyekwelu-Udoka, Md Shafiqul IslamAbstract
Automatic speech recognition (ASR) pipelines often normalize transcripts by removing filled pauses and punctuation and expanding colloquial forms, potentially discarding cues useful for dialogue act classification. We evaluate nine transcript conditions across six classifiers (TF-IDF logistic regression, RoBERTa, BERT, ALBERT, GPT-2, and BiLSTM) and three conversational corpora (Switchboard, ICSI MRDA, and SLUE-HVB), supplemented by multi-seed experiments, normalization controls, and real-ASR evaluations. Across five random seeds, heavy normalization reduces Macro-F1 in all 15 neural model-corpus combinations under the original preprocessing protocols. Removal using the original filler and backchannel lexicon consistently degrades performance on MRDA and SLUE-HVB but produces mixed effects on Switchboard. Punctuation-aware TF-IDF experiments show that punctuation removal reduces Macro-F1 by 0.036 on Switchboard and 0.078 on MRDA, demonstrating that the original linear baseline's apparent insensitivity resulted from tokenization. Restricting filler removal to um, uh, and erm preserves degradation on MRDA but largely eliminates the SLUE-HVB effect, where the original lexicon removes class-defining backchannel expressions. These findings demonstrate that normalization effects depend on preprocessing definitions, feature extraction, and conversational context, supporting task-dependent rather than indiscriminate transcript normalization.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22934
PDF
-
ToMStories: Interpreting Theory-of-Mind in Synthetic Narratives
2026-10-15 20:38:58Melanie Subbiah, Chia-En Jacklyn Tsai, Kathleen McKeownAbstract
Understanding people often requires inferring what they feel or want from how they behave rather than from what they state outright. We ask whether language models can make these inferences, and how they do so. We introduce Theory-of-Mind Stories (ToMStories), an evaluation dataset of ~6,000 short synthetically generated narrative vignettes, each paired with a multiple-choice or open-ended question about a character's emotion, fear, motivation, or emotional wound. These psychological states are conveyed implicitly (showing), explicitly (telling), or with conflict between dialogue and description. Evaluating thirteen open-weight models (1B-72B parameters), we find that the largest models match humans on multiple choice but not open-ended questions. Our analyses point to simplifications models make in both interpretation and generation of implicit psychological states, indicating that synthetic data can help us understand how models perform interpretation, but likely overestimates how well models interpret humans.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22632
PDF
