LLM
-
CausGround: Causal Interaction Grounding for Adaptive Embodied Planning
2026-10-21 13:16:19Yijun Shen, Diqi He, Jinbang Guo, Wanyue Zhang, Jiaming Mi, Huan Yang, Zhongyuan Wang, Zhiwei Yu, Kai ZhangAbstract
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) show promising reasoning capabilities, but reliable physical interaction requires planning that accounts for when actions are executable and how they change the world. These preconditions and effects are environment-dependent and often not captured by MLLMs, making adaptation challenging. Yet existing approaches either require costly environment-specific training or rely on unstructured interaction experience that is difficult to reuse. Therefore, we introduce CausGround, a non-parametric causal interaction grounding framework that distills interaction experience into reusable action-centered causal knowledge. CausGround identifies action preconditions and effects and organizes them in a factorized world-state representation capturing object attributes and inter-object relations. At planning time, task-relevant causal dependencies are grounded in current observations to support backward reasoning over preconditions and forward reasoning over effects for action selection and multi-step planning. We evaluate CausGround on simulated high-level planning, interaction reasoning, and real-world robot manipulation. On adapted VirtualHome and RoboCasa benchmarks, CausGround improves vision-based high-level planning across MLLM backbones, increasing average task success from 24.9% to 53.3% on VirtualHome and closed-loop planning success from 43.0% to 57.0% on RoboCasa. On SWITCH, average interaction reasoning accuracy increases from 25.8% to 31.9%, indicating improved action selection, recovery, and verification. Moreover, real-world experiments show that CausGround reasons backward from MLLM-interpreted goals to derive executable high-level action sequences for sequential manipulation. These results demonstrate that reusable action preconditions and effects support long-horizon embodied planning across diverse environments without parameter updates.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29702
PDF
-
Rethinking Post-hoc Debiasing of Large Pretrained Models
2026-10-21 13:00:28Divyaansh Mertia, Chirag Bhutra, Himanshu Shekhar, Shubham Bagwari, Pratik MazumderAbstract
Large pretrained models such as CLIP are widely used as frozen feature extractors. However, their embeddings inherit spurious correlations from training data, introducing bias into the features. A growing body of research has sought to address this issue through post hoc debiasing, leaving the backbone untouched. We discover that despite differing mechanisms, these methods require the bias feature to be identified and expressed in text. This dependency is not innocuous. In this work, we experimentally demonstrate that this requirement incurs an unforeseen penalty in certain scenarios. For example, on the UrbanCars benchmark, having two co-occurring bias attributes, the recent methods underperform a vanilla classifier on biased frozenbackbone features, and even providing ground-truth bias identities does not close the gap. We show that the pattern that such methods seek is readily observable in the frozen geometry. Specifically, cross-class training pairs placed closest together by the frozen encoder almost always share a spurious attribute, regardless of the bias type, without requiring access to the bias labels. Based on this, we propose a novel approach to identify such pairs and learn a single linear map that transforms the features to perform post-hoc debiasing. The proposed approach achieves competitive performance across all datasets without access to bias attribute annotations or any LLMs.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29688
PDF
-
Conflicted Records: Typed Adversarial Contracts for Auditable LLM Output Quality Enforcement
2026-10-21 12:43:35Kardelen Subasi, Jaros{\l}aw A. ChudziakAbstract
LLM-generated records increasingly populate production information systems where they are treated as data assets subject to the same quality expectations as records from operational databases. A single such record can simultaneously satisfy and violate a quality rule: a grounded fact adjacent to a hallucination, a useful answer adjacent to a stereotype. Classical data cleaning cannot resolve this because the two judgments are incompatible over the same span; a single LLM judge cannot either, since it shares the training biases that produced the conflict. Existing interventions such as prompt engineering, chain-of-thought, and RLHF reduce surface error rates but provide no audit trail and cannot distinguish genuine remediation from blanket suppression. The question is whether a deterministic check over structured inter-agent records can catch the defects that referential checks alone miss. We present BiasGuard-D: two adversarial roles drawn from distinct model families exchange typed claim documents, a three-model quorum adjudicates by majority vote, and a combined referential-plus-semantic invariant validates the verdict. The semantic component fires on verdicts referential checks miss; removing the iterative loop drops invariant satisfaction sharply. The deliberation layer transfers from stereotype to hallucination remediation on HaluEval QA with only role-framing changes, raising right-answer recovery by 49 percentage points; the triage gate required a cross-family second auditor to maintain recall on objective hallucination. Every claim, vote, and instruction is stored as a typed record giving operators a provenance trail auditable under emerging AI regulations.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29669
PDF
-
Lineage-Aware Search Control for LLM-Based Evolutionary Factor Mining
2026-10-21 12:40:52Xintong Liu, Chenkai Zhang, Yanzhao Ma, Peng YangAbstract
Formulaic alpha factor mining searches for symbolic expressions that transform market data into predictive signals. Recent LLM-based evolutionary factor mining methods use large language models as semantic variation operators. Under the conventional LLM-EA paradigm, stochastic variation and fitness-based selection can leave the search weakly directed and concentrated around a narrow set of structurally similar factors. We argue that these limitations arise because current methods mainly organize search at the individual and population levels, leaving lineage-level control underused. A lineage connects successive factor variants through evolutionary descent. We propose LineageEvo, which uses lineage in two coupled forms of search control: (1) lineage-conditioned LLM variation, which distills Lineage-Scoped Search Experience into operator-specific priors and fuses them with global operator priors, providing persistent, lineage-relevant guidance for LLM generation; and (2) lineage-stratified search allocation, which balances factor quality against lineage concentration by distributing the search budget across lineages during evolutionary search. Together, these mechanisms make semantic variation more direction aware and prevent branches from dominating the evolution, thereby promoting the discovery of predictive and diverse factors. We evaluate LineageEvo on CSI 500 and S&P 500 in terms of factor predictiveness, portfolio performance, search efficiency, and lineage- and expression-level diversity. LineageEvo achieves the strongest predictive performance on both markets, while LSPS produces a more balanced lineage distribution and a structurally broader factor pool. The results support lineage as a useful intermediate unit for controlling LLM-based evolutionary factor search.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29663
PDF
-
Effects of Model Scale and Quantization on Social Bias and Abstention in Question Answering
2026-10-21 12:38:04Kuniko Paxton, Ifeoluwa Wuraola, Dhavalkumar ThakkerAbstract
The deployment of small and quantized language models in resource-constrained settings raises an important fairness question: when a compressed model produces fewer biased responses, does this reflect fairer behavior or greater abstention? We study this problem in Question Answering (QA) using the BBQ benchmark across multiple model sizes and quantization settings from Qwen3, Gemma-3, and SmolLM2. We also examine whether the observed trends remain stable across alternative prompt formulations and when the ``Unknown'' option is removed in a forced-choice setting. Our results show that larger models achieved higher QA accuracy, but bias showed no simple scaling trend and quantization effects varied across configurations. Notably, 20 of the 26 configurations with fewer biased responses also show increased over-abstention, indicating that lower observed bias can partly reflect greater abstention. These findings show that lower observed bias can partly reflect greater abstention, and that fairness evaluation should consider biased responses, abstention, prompt formulation, and answer-option design jointly.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29657
PDF
-
LLMs as survey respondents: Comparison to simple semantic baselines
2026-10-21 12:26:20Esko Lehtonen, Tommi Buder-Gr\"ondahlAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) have been explored as surrogates for human survey respondents. A more promising application is data augmentation, where LLMs predict new responses from partial human data. However, the semantic similarity between questionnaire items is a known source of correlation between answers. It is thus unclear whether LLMs actually infer meaningful relationships between question-response pairs, or use surface-level comparison between questions as a heuristic. To assess this, we evaluated how three LLMs can predict responses to held-out items in two surveys measuring attitudes toward automated or light-electric vehicles, based on varying proportions of known responses. Performance was compared to two baselines, where new responses were derived by maximizing embedding-similarity to a prior response. While LLMs mostly predicted human responses better than baselines, their performance consistently declined with a lower share of known responses, even aligning with the baseline in one survey. Our results show that LLMs' capacities for augmenting replies varied across surveys, and can revert to the same levels as simpler embedding similarity baselines when less data is available.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29645
PDF
-
Overview of CHIP 2026 Shared Task 1: Patient-Specific Phenotype Concept Recognition in Full-Text Biomedical Literature
2026-10-21 11:45:35Xuanlyu Zhu, Feng Tian, Yang Zhong, Pengqi Zheng, Xiwen Bi, Ling Luo, Yuanyuan Sun, Jian Wang, Lingfei LinAbstract
Automatic phenotype information extraction plays an important role in rare disease diagnosis, genotype-phenotype analysis, and precision medicine. However, accurately identifying phenotype concepts and determining their associations with specific patients remain challenging, particularly in full-text biomedical articles involving multiple patients and complex clinical descriptions. This paper presents an overview of CHIP 2026 Shared Task 1, which aims to promote the development of methods for patient-specific phenotype concept recognition from full-text biomedical literature. The task consists of two subtasks: full-text phenotype concept recognition and patient-specific phenotype association. For this evaluation, we used 200 annotated full-text biomedical articles from the PatientPheX dataset, containing 506 patients, 15,193 phenotype mentions, and 5,656 patient-phenotype associations. A total of 455 teams registered for the competition, with 189 and 103 valid submissions received on the Phase A and Phase B leaderboards, respectively. The best-performing system achieved an overall score of 0.7389 on the final test set, outperforming the baseline by 8.37 percentage points. The top-performing teams explored diverse approaches combining biomedical language models, large language models (LLMs), and ensemble strategies. The evaluation results highlight both the potential of these approaches and the remaining challenges in patient attribution and phenotype normalization from full-text biomedical literature. The post-evaluation phase remains open at this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29606
PDF
-
Melange: A Synthetic Visual Bias Benchmark for Multi-modal Large Language Models
2026-10-21 10:25:06Razieh Rezaei, Ehsaneddin Asgary, Masoud Jalili SabetAbstract
Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have seen broad adoption, but their biases are still far less examined than those of standard LLMs, creating possible social harms when deployed in real-world settings. Prior efforts to extend bias analyses from LLMs into the multi-modal space either cover only a few bias categories or do not ensure that the groups being compared are clearly addressed by visual cues in the images. To overcome these limitations, we introduce Melange, a wide-ranging synthetic visual benchmark covering seven categories for assessing social biases in MLLMs. It is grounded in the widely used language-only BBQ dataset (Bias Benchmark for Question Answering) from BigBench, carefully extending its constructed contexts via controlled generation of visual scenarios so the target attributes appear visually and clearly. To maximize reliability, our generated images pass through two stages of validation: automated screening using visual question answering (VQA) and subsequent manual inspection by human annotators. By systematically evaluating 23 open-source MLLMs across three matched evaluation settings---text-only, image-only, and image-with-context---Melange isolates the fairness effect of the input modality. Switching from text to vision reduces fairness by 0.291 on average, a gap that varies by model family rather than by scale alone. A perception control confirms that this gap is not an artifact of visual comprehension: models identify the depicted attributes at 90--95\% accuracy yet still fail to abstain. When models do commit to a biased answer, polarity-aware stereotype alignment shows they choose the human-stereotypical response roughly three-quarters of the time.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29537
PDF
-
Beyond the Vote: When Do LLMs Add Value to Retrieval-Based Tabular Classification?
2026-10-21 10:06:29Ziquan Wang, Yuxuan Nie, Jian Ma, Yingjie LiAbstract
Retrieval-based in-context learning (ICL) enables large language models (LLMs) to predict tabular labels from similar examples, but it remains unclear whether LLM inference improves on direct voting over those same examples. We address this question by comparing four general-purpose LLMs with distance-weighted nearest-neighbor voting (Distance-KNN) using identical retrieved neighbors across 19 tabular classification datasets. With the number of demonstrations fixed, enlarging the retrieval candidate pool improves accuracy for all predictors, yet Distance-KNN achieves the highest mean accuracy at every pool size. More detailed analyses reveal that LLM gains are concentrated where retrieved neighbors exhibit low label consensus and vary across models. These gains further depend on the average feature-space distance to the test query: under low label consensus, some LLMs outperform Distance-KNN in close and intermediate neighborhoods, but all fall behind on average in the most distant group. Complementary experiments on the number of demonstrations, prompt formulation, retrieval representation, and label-balanced demonstration selection largely preserve the overall findings. These results characterize when LLM inference adds predictive value beyond distance-weighted voting in retrieval-based tabular ICL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29520
PDF
-
Mitigating Query Shortcuts in Chain-of-Thought with Context-Aware Decoding
Abstract
While Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting improves the reasoning performance of large language models (LLMs), recent studies have shown that final answers do not always depend on the generated rationales. In particular, LLMs may rely on query-specific shortcuts rather than the information provided by their reasoning steps. In this paper, we investigate whether context-aware decoding (CAD), an existing contrastive decoding method, can mitigate such shortcut behavior when applied to CoT reasoning. We study this application as Rationale Contrastive Decoding (RCD), which contrasts the next-token distributions conditioned on the query with and without its rationale, amplifying tokens whose likelihood increases due to the rationale. We provide a theoretical interpretation of this decoding rule via a KL-regularized reward-maximization objective. Experiments across five reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that RCD improves answer accuracy over standard CoT. Furthermore, intervention analyses using ground-truth and random rationales reveal that RCD increases the behavioral dependence of final answers on the rationale content. Our findings suggest that contrastive decoding offers a simple, training-free approach to mitigating query shortcuts.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29518
PDF
-
Keeping Time vs. Understanding Time: Neither Alone Explains Temporal Reasoning in LLMs
2026-10-21 09:58:46Auss Abbood, Fernando Mart\'inez-Plumed, Jos\'e Hern\'andez-Orallo, Nigel CollierAbstract
Temporal reasoning is widely assumed to decompose into two modes: temporal arithmetic (date and time calculations), and temporal semantics (understanding temporal and causal relations). This dichotomy shapes how benchmarks are designed, how models are trained, and how progress is measured, yet its empirical validity has never been directly tested. We provide two lines of evidence that challenge it. First, we test whether tasks labelled as arithmetic or semantic by the benchmarks support transferable gains within their purported mode. Finetuning on these subsets yields predominantly dataset-specific gains ($+6.8$ to $+23.1$ percentage points), while transfer to a different dataset in the same mode ranges from $-3.2$ to $+1.1$ percentage points. Across the two benchmark families used in the transfer analysis, this pattern provides little evidence of coherent, transferable temporal abilities. Second, using cognitive-demand-based model evaluation, we examine which capabilities actually drive performance on these benchmarks. We find that quantitative and logical reasoning, the assumed proxies for temporal arithmetic and temporal semantics, are not the primary drivers; knowledge is. Together, these findings show that current temporal reasoning benchmarks do not cleanly realise the arithmetic-semantics distinction and instead largely reward models for remembering how time typically works.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29507
PDF
-
ChemBART: Pre-training a Reaction Language Model for Comprehensive Synthesis Planning
2026-10-21 09:54:00Kenan Li, Yijian Zhang, Jin Wang, Haipeng Gan, Zeying Sun, Xiaoguang Lei, Hao DongAbstract
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated transformative potential across diverse fields. However, in computer-aided synthesis planning (CASP), current LLM methodologies are often restricted to single-molecule representations, limiting their application to isolated, single-task scenarios such as precursor prediction. Addressing this gap, we present ChemBART, a BART-based language model that adopts a reaction-centric pre-training strategy. By leveraging a mask-filling pre-training task on holistic reaction expressions (Reactant > Reagent > Product), ChemBART effectively solves a variety of chemical problems, including precursor/reagent generation, temperature-yield regression, and molecular property classification. Building on these capabilities, we demonstrate the integration of ChemBART with Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS) for multi-step synthesis route design, where the model serves to optimize the policy and value functions within a reinforcement learning framework. Beyond single-molecule pre-trained LLMs that are constrained to specific applications, ChemBART unifies diverse chemical tasks to facilitate synthesis planning with comprehensive implementation information. Most significantly, the proposed multi-step synthesis routes and reaction conditions were validated in the wet lab, confirming the discovery of shorter synthetic pathways with a >20% yield improvement over established literature benchmarks. Our work highlights the potential of reaction-focused pre-training and showcases the broad utility of ChemBART in closing the loop between in silico prediction and wet-lab synthesis.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.02915
PDF
-
Parallel Thinking for Large Language Model with Path Diversity
2026-10-21 09:51:42Jiaru Qian, Yihong Dong, Xue Jiang, Chun-Wah Hsu, Zhi Jin, Ge LiAbstract
Parallel thinking has emerged as a promising paradigm for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) by exploring multiple reasoning paths simultaneously. However, we identify that parallel thinking via Reinforcement Learning (RL) typically suffers from the mode collapse of reasoning paths, where parallel thinking trajectories degenerate into similar ones. This homogeneity undermines the fundamental motivation of parallel thinking, that is, maintaining multiple hypotheses concurrently to prevent premature loss into a suboptimal solution. In this paper, we propose Diverse Parallel Thinking (DPT), a simple yet effective RL approach for parallel thinking designed to encourage path diversity. DPT rewards the model to develop distinct reasoning strategies by penalizing the prefix similarity of parallel thinking paths, thereby enhancing a more comprehensive exploration of the reasoning space. We conduct various experiments and analyses across multiple reasoning benchmarks to demonstrate the effectiveness of DPT. Results show that DPT successfully outperforms previous parallel thinking methods, achieving state-of-the-art performance over baselines. We validate path diversity as a key element to improve parallel thinking. Our code is available at this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29501
PDF
-
Balancing Foundation Models and Trait-Specific Learning for Forehead-Crease Recognition
2026-10-21 09:50:08Geetanjali Sharma, Aryan Jain, Dev Nagaich, Aditya Nigam, Raghavendra RamachandraAbstract
Biometric recognition often degrades under partial facial vis- ibility, where conventional facial cues are occluded. The forehead region remains consistently visible and contains distinctive crease patterns that can serve as a complementary biometric trait. We present a unified eval- uation of forehead-crease recognition across explainable zero-shot rea- soning, domain-adaptive learning, and trait-specific modeling. FIRE en- ables interpretable zero-shot verification using multimodal large language models, while pretrained face-recognition models are adapted to the fore- head domain through margin-based learning. Under open-set evaluation, the best zero-shot model GPT-4o+FIRE achieves 18.22% EER, while Edge-Forehead achieves 8.30% EER and 54.01% TMR@0.1% FMR. The results show that although MLLMs offer interpretable zero-shot verifi- cation, trait-specific learning remains more effective for robust forehead- crease biometric recognition.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29495
PDF
-
OmniSimulator: Aligning Small Language Models for Authentic Heterogeneous Behavior Modeling
2026-10-21 09:30:12Jiawei Chen, Ruoxi Xu, Boxi Cao, Zhuoqun Li, Ruotong Pan, Yunfei Zhang, Zhirui Yang, Jingyan Chen, Tingting Gao, Han Li, Yaojie Lu, Xianpei Han, Le Sun, Xiangyu Wu, Hongyu LinAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) have shown great potential as general-purpose user simulators for interactive systems. Prior studies have demonstrated that training on high-quality data can substantially improve model reasoning and downstream task performance. However, the upper bound of user simulation is still constrained by the model's reasoning paradigm: native chain-of-thought often degenerates into shallow pattern matching and fails to adequately model the behavioral factors underlying real user decisions. In this paper, we propose OmniSimulator, a novel training framework designed to improve the predictive ability of small LLMs for realistic user simulation on short-video platform environments. Specifically, OmniSimulator organizes behavior-oriented reasoning through a structured schema with five dimensions, carefully selects data from real user-behavior scenarios, and introduces a teacher model to generate high-quality reasoning traces under the proposed schema, helping small models learn behavior-relevant reasoning patterns rather than relying on superficial behavioral correlations. Based on this process, we construct 9,881 high-quality training instances from three months of historical interaction trajectories of 200 real users, averaging about 50 distilled examples per user. Experimental results show that OmniSimulator improves the average score of Qwen3-8B by 34.33%, achieves performance competitive with Claude-Sonnet-4.5, and supports smaller-scale, self-hosted deployment. These results suggest that learning structured behavior-oriented reasoning patterns is a promising direction towards scalable and high-fidelity LLM-based user simulation.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29472
PDF
-
Omnilingual-MsASR: Benchmarking Multimodal, Multilingual, Long-Form Multi-Speaker ASR of Omni Large Language Models
2026-10-21 09:11:30Yuan Ge, Pei Zhang, Xize Cheng, Lingzhou Mu, Mingyang Wang, Jin Xu, Baosong Yang, Shengxiang Gao, Jingbo Zhu, Zhengtao Yu, Tong XiaoAbstract
Omni-modal large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in audio and video understanding. However, existing models struggle with long-form, multi-speaker videos, especially in understanding the entire video and recognizing who says what and when. To characterize the capability limit of current omni LLMs and guide future model development, we introduce Omnilingual-MsASR, a multilingual, multimodal benchmark for long-form Multi-speaker Automatic Speech Recognition (MsASR) covering six languages, recordings up to 30 minutes, and scenarios with up to 20 speakers. Omnilingual-MsASR provides parallel audio and video inputs to evaluate models' cross-modal consistency and their ability to exploit complementary cues across modalities. Extensive evaluations of leading omni-modal LLMs reveal substantial performance bottlenecks, while their tcpWERs frequently exceed 100%. These findings highlight fine-grained temporal localization, speaker disambiguation, and cross-modal synergy as key challenges for future omni-modal foundation models. Our work is available at this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29455
PDF
-
DynaWeave: Learning to Adapt through Dynamic Scenario Synthesis
2026-10-21 09:03:10Xuan Yang, Chunxiao Liu, Hongsheng Xin, Hao Xu, Ning MiaoAbstract
Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly use tools to complete tasks in stateful environments. However, many training environments remain largely static apart from changes caused by the agent's own actions, whereas external events introduced by other users, services, or sudden contingencies in real environments can invalidate ongoing plans. To address this gap, we introduce DynaWeave, an automated synthesis framework that transforms existing static tasks into verifiable dynamic scenarios. The framework generates exogenous events relevant to each task, covering changes in task requirements, environment state, and external information. It uses directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to represent dependencies between events and an execution engine to activate them during agent interaction. A dynamic verifier revises only the evaluation checks affected by events that actually occur and retains all other checks. Using DynaWeave, we collect 2,095 verified interaction trajectories across 36 environments and use them for supervised fine-tuning of Qwen3.5 models. Experiments on Gaia2, CostBench, and ToolMaze show that DynaWeave achieves consistent improvements in overall performance across all three evaluated model sizes, increasing the task completion rate on CostBench by 67.34 percentage points and even exceeding the performance of Gemini-3.1-Pro-Preview on ToolMaze. These results support dynamic scenario synthesis as a practical approach to training agents to adapt to changing environments. Our code is available at this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29443
PDF
-
LLMSeg: Training-Free Text-Prompted Image Segmentation with B-Splines
2026-10-21 08:35:16Abdullah HamdiAbstract
Promptable segmentation models such as SAM 3 achieve remarkable open-vocabulary performance but require dedicated architectures, large-scale annotation engines, and task-specific training. We ask a different question: can a general-purpose multimodal large language model (MLLM) segment images directly, without an added segmentation head, mask decoder, or training? We present LLMSeg, a training-free pipeline that turns a vision-capable LLM into a text-prompted image segmenter. LLMSeg decomposes segmentation into three LLM-driven stages. First, detect localizes all instances matching a free-form text query and describes their coarse morphology. Next, segment traces each instance using closed periodic B-splines confined to its detected box. These splines define an outer boundary and optional hole loops. Finally, refine iteratively proposes focus boxes around residual errors and retraces confined splines. The process ends when the mask stabilizes or the pass budget is exhausted. The output is a binary mask with inspectable intermediate geometry. We evaluate LLMSeg across ten referring and reasoning segmentation splits (ReasonSeg and RefCOCO/+/g). We also evaluate open-vocabulary instance segmentation (LVIS, COCO, and SA-Co), semantic segmentation, and zero-shot detection (ODinW13 and RF-100VL). With an off-the-shelf Gemini-3.7-Flash backend, LLMSeg is competitive with and often surpasses the specialist SAM 3 model on identical items. It reaches 71.5 cIoU on ReasonSeg val without additional segmentation-specific training. Backend model updates can improve accuracy without retraining the pipeline. The code is available at this https URL .
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29409
PDF
-
Right On Q: Recovering Reasoning under Quantization via Self-Generated Trajectories
2026-10-21 08:03:24Boyuan Zheng, Jing Xiong, Chenwei Wu, Hui Shen, Zesen Zhao, Hei Ting Una Chan, Xueshen Liu, Zhen Zhang, Liyue Shen, Zechun Liu, Z. Morley MaoAbstract
Quantization-aware training (QAT) aims to recover reasoning capabilities in low-bit large language models (LLMs). Existing recipes typically supervise the quantized student with the original full-precision model on fixed response sequences. However, the resulting low-bit quantized models still struggle on long-horizon reasoning tasks and often fail to terminate within a token budget that suffices for the full-precision model. We identify two challenges in closing this gap. First, fixed-response supervision leaves a mismatch between training prefixes and those encountered during student generation, and this trajectory divergence grows as responses lengthen. Second, on its own prefixes, the student underpredicts some next-token candidates and overpredicts others, and this distributional misalignment becomes more frequent at high-entropy prefixes. We present OnQ, a low-bit recovery pipeline that combines on-policy distillation and candidate-wise Dynamic KL. Starting from block-wise calibration, the quantized student generates responses and receives full-precision teacher supervision on its own prefixes. Dynamic KL weights forward and reverse KL by each candidate's teacher-student probability ratio to balance correction of under- and overprediction. Across Qwen3-1.7B, 4B, and 8B at 2- and 3-bit precision, OnQ achieves the highest nine-benchmark average, with the largest gains on long-horizon reasoning benchmarks. At 2 bits, it outperforms every baseline on every benchmark at every model size, improving the Qwen3-8B average by 10.26 points over the strongest baseline. It also produces shorter responses with fewer truncations and repetitive errors.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29378
PDF
-
B-CARE: Blind Classwise Assessment of Relative Evidence for Stance Error Ranking
2026-10-21 07:43:27Meysam Sabbaghan, Doina CarageaAbstract
Stance classifiers make errors that can be costly to identify under limited human-review budgets. Prioritizing potentially incorrect predictions remains challenging, particularly across heterogeneous base models. We introduce B-CARE (Blind Classwise Assessment of Relative Evidence for Stance Error Ranking), a prediction-blind framework for identifying high-risk stance predictions. Given only a target and text, a fixed LLM verifier assigns ordinal evidence scores to all candidate stance labels without observing the base model's prediction or confidence. B-CARE constructs a comparative risk score by contrasting the strongest alternative-class evidence with the evidence supporting the predicted class. The resulting classwise evidence profile can be reused across multiple base models without training a separate error detector or calibrating risk scores. We evaluate B-CARE on four stance benchmarks and three heterogeneous base LLMs, covering 12 dataset-model settings and 5,206 unique test instances. Evaluation includes error-ranking discrimination (AUROC and AUPRC), selective prediction (E-AURC), and review effectiveness (ErrorCapture at fixed review budgets). B-CARE achieves a mean AUROC of 0.735 and a mean AUPRC of 0.524, capturing 41.06% of errors within the highest-risk 20% of predictions. Although B-CARE does not uniformly outperform strong confidence-based baselines, it provides a reusable, complementary evidence signal for prioritizing potentially incorrect stance predictions across heterogeneous models.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29350
PDF
