Reflective prompt optimization improves instructions using task feedback, but coupling candidate generation with full-validation-based selection can make search costly and sequential. We propose a two-stage framework that decouples reflective candidate-pool construction from validation allocation. During construction, we sample multiple parents and reuse each parent's training responses across parallel reflection branches. Each revision is screened against its parent on a small training minibatch, allowing locally improved candidates to support further revisions without full validation. After construction, an exploration policy selects candidates from the frozen pool under a fixed full-validation budget, and the prompt with the highest measured validation score is returned. This separation allows candidate-pool size and validation budget to be set independently. We evaluate random selection and learned score prediction with similarity-based exploration on five benchmarks using Qwen3.5-9B and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct. With 100 retained candidates and 20 full validations, our framework improves over the initial solver by up to 11.22 percentage points. Learned selection improves over the initial solver in all ten comparisons, although neither selection policy consistently outperforms the other. These results support separating reflective search from budgeted validation while leaving room for stronger candidate-selection policies.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27367
Industrial artificial intelligence (AI) planning systems combine predictive models, optimization logic, controls, and governance rules, but improvement in the complete policy does not show whether one addition made an independent contribution or whether that contribution justifies its burden. We address this attribution problem with an observable evidence standard that separates opportunity to act, executed-plan change, operational consequence, equivalence, uncertainty, and operating scope. Using forecast-to-plan replay on Favorita, M5, and Walmart data, we apply the standard to heterogeneous planning additions. Three limits of single-indicator evaluation emerge. First, a composite policy can conceal negligible component contribution: one control changed only 15 of 681 executed plans. Second, changing execution does not guarantee stable benefit: the evaluated multi-period capability helped in several long-lead settings but was 7.6% more costly under tight capacity. Third, indirect evidence can prioritize review but cannot complete attribution. Independent runs produced different paths in 19 of 599 cases that a rule-based check predicted would be unchanged. Although a lower-cost diagnostic matched the full-evaluation winner in only 55.0% of cases, it selected an option within the $10^{-6}$ cost-equivalence tolerance in 79.5%; the remaining cases prevented the proxy from authorizing acceptance. These experiments establish capability-level contribution evidence; the organization completes the value decision by weighing it against implementation and sustaining burden. The resulting capability evidence record links the observations to validation, deployment scope, fallback, monitoring, redesign, and retirement decisions.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27305
Safe Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (SMARL) aims to learn cooperative control policies under prescribed safety constraints. Al- though existing SMARL methods focus on enforcing safety during policy optimization, their vulnerability remains largely unexplored. This paper investigates inference-time observation attacks against SMARL, where an adversary perturbs the observations of a subset of agents, thereby altering the actions produced by their policies. We propose MinMax Attack, an attack framework that jointly selects adversarial target actions for compromised agents while accounting for the Cooperative Resistance of benign agents. We further derive a bound on the induced safety cost and characterize its relation- ship with the Compromised-Agent Budget and the Perturbation Budget. Experiments across multiple safety-critical multi-agent benchmarks and representative state-of-the-art SMARL algorithms show that MinMax Attack induces substantially higher safety costs than existing attack baselines while preserving task reward, thereby reducing its detectability and achieving both attack effectiveness and stealthiness.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27293
Walking without vision requires timely, unambiguous guidance, yet many wearable aids encode directions as audio or vibrotactile signals that users must translate into movement. We present XoNav, a four-actuator hip exoskeleton that renders guidance cues directly at the hip joints. It renders an Advance cue and two-level Braking cues through sagittal-plane actuators and two-level Steering cues through frontal-plane actuators. A bilateral LSTM-based gait-state classifier uses two thigh-mounted IMUs to identify gait states, enabling haptic cues to be delivered in coordination with the wearer's gait while suppressing them during standing. The classifier generalized to unseen users with recalls of 95.2-97.9%, with mean detection delays of 38.6 and 63.1 ms for stance-to-swing and swing-to-stance transitions, respectively. Constrained human-in-the-loop Bayesian optimization personalized Braking for minimum resistance and Steering for maximum comfort while ensuring detectability and safety. All participants reliably distinguished between grades of their personalized cues and the firmest Braking cue remained below 53% of the safety limit. In blindfolded Wizard-of-Oz navigation trials along three paths, the participants kept 98.8% of the walked distance within a 0.75 m wide passage, with a 4.9% increase in mean progression speed per trial. A body-worn camera, RTAB-Map and Nav2 further enabled a feasibility study of autonomous navigation and detours around previously unmapped obstacles.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27271
Preference labels align model training, but the judgments behind them are difficult to inspect or verify. In this paper, we examine how preference construction can be checked when intermediate decisions are recorded, and which of them remain uncertain. We present Symbolic Preference Labeling, a method in which a pretrained language model classifies predefined attributes of prompts and responses. Explicit rules assign response verdicts, and a fixed verdict ranking determines the preference label. Each preference label has a recorded derivation: the response verdicts and preference label can be recomputed from the stored attribute assignments, rules, and verdict ranking without rerunning the language model. On 200 prompts annotated by human raters, the language model produces valid structured outputs for 192 prompts. All eight parsing failures occur in the subset of self-harm prompts marked as harmful. Using 465 preference pairs, we train one policy model with direct preference optimization across five training seeds. Mean measured benign refusal is 40.82 percent on 1,319 benign prompts that resemble unsafe ones, and mean measured toxic refusal is 84.98 percent on 655 toxic prompts. This study distinguishes the reproducibility of preference labels from attribute correctness. The recorded derivations make preference construction open to inspection, while attribute correctness and semantic safety require separate validation.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27266
We present a study on controlled automatic simplification of Russian texts using preference-based optimization algorithms with a focus on adapting texts to the A1, A2 and B1 proficiency levels. We fine-tune YandexGPT using Rejection Sampling and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) methods to improve control over the complexity of the generated text. We compare several training configurations that differ in dataset composition, text type and the strategy used to construct preference pairs for DPO. For automatic evaluation we train a regression model based on ruRoBERTa-large to predict continuous complexity scores corresponding to CEFR levels. We also consider semantic similarity, lexical coverage and quantitative readability metrics. Human evaluation assesses simplicity, fluency and adequacy. Our best model achieves 87.15\% target level accuracy, an MAE of 0.35 CEFR levels and a target interval MAE of 0.11. Manual assessment shows that 75% of the evaluated simplifications match the target morphological and syntactic level, and fluency and adequacy scores are especially high for A2 and B1. Although A1 remains the most challenging level, the model significantly reduces the proportion of vocabulary and grammatical constructions beyond the target level while generally preserving meaning. Our model is freely available on $\href{this https URL}{HuggingFace}$.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27237
Euclidean combinatorial optimization problems (ECOPs), such as the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) and Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP), possess inherent symmetries under the two-dimensional Euclidean group E(2), including rotations, reflections, and translations. Existing learning-based methods, including recent diffusion-based methods, rely on data augmentation or regularization to approximate E(2)-equivariance. This paper presents EDISCO, the first discrete diffusion model for ECOPs with exact E(2)-invariant generative distributions over node-index solutions. EDISCO introduces an E(2)-equivariant edge-score network coupled with a categorical continuous-time Markov chain over discrete edge variables, and exact posterior sampling provides efficient multi-step inference. This design gives EDISCO a local geometric inductive bias: edge neighborhoods with the same relative geometry and combinatorial context are represented consistently regardless of absolute position or orientation, making learning more efficient and inference more robust than non-equivariant methods. EDISCO outperforms previous learning-based state-of-the-art solvers on synthetic TSP from 100 to 10000 nodes and CVRP from 50 to 2000 customers, while using only 33-50% of the training instances. Trained only on uniform synthetic data, EDISCO also outperforms competing learning-based baselines under spatial distribution shift and CVRP constraint-tightness shift. Code is available at this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.04953
A poker agent can make a legal move and still make a strategically poor one. We ask whether compact AI agents can exhibit strategic behavior under hidden information and whether preference optimization can improve beyond static and zero-shot policies. We first evaluate a static baseline and three frozen language models: SmallThinker, Qwen3, and Gemma-3 whose performance varies substantially between exact-game and six-player evaluation. We therefore propose Strategic Preference Optimization with KL-anchored Equilibrium (SPOKE), combining teacher-relative value penalties, policy anchoring, risk constraints, and structured rationale supervision, and compare it with SFT, DPO, GRPO, and GSPO. Across three runs of a SmallThinker-4B-A0.6B policy, SPOKE achieves the lowest mean exploitability in Kuhn (0.213) and Leduc (1.081) and the highest six-max top-1 agreement (0.775), while maintaining teacher KL comparable to SFT (0.522 vs 0.523). These results provide preliminary evidence that strategic preference optimization can improve strategic quality while preserving teacher-consistent behavior.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27028
Activation steering for ASR systems is an underexplored technique in improving both ASR performance and demographic fairness. We investigate two forms of activation steering: paired activation subtraction, and supervised optimization. We find the former to be ineffective at ameliorating ASR performance whatsoever, while the latter is quite effective at deriving steering vectors (SVs) that improve at once overall ASR performance and demographic fairness along such diverse axes as gender, age, and dialect. We also explore what types of data---from the most to the least personal---are necessary for calculating or training SVs. First, we show significant performance in performance from training SVs using an eclectic group of speakers from the same dataset. Furthermore, we find that vectors trained using acoustically similar speakers leads to ASR performances that are competitive or superior to vectors trained on the same speaker, or speakers from the same labeled demographic group. This finding shows that we can harness activation steering for few-shot adaptation given access to a speaker's demography, or zero-shot adaptation to unseen speakers without the need for any labels at all.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26994
Split Federated Learning (SFL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for training large-scale deep models on resource-constrained edge devices. Although asynchronous SFL alleviates the straggler bottleneck caused by system heterogeneity, it inevitably introduces two coupled dimensions of inconsistency: horizontal inconsistency across clients and vertical inconsistency between clients and the server. These inconsistencies, further exacerbated by statistical heterogeneity, result in biased activation representations, model divergence, and severe client drift. To address these challenges, we propose CoASFL, an inconsistency-aware asynchronous SFL framework that incorporates a dynamic activation merging mechanism and a consistency-aware model aggregation mechanism. Specifically, CoASFL constructs more consistent activation sequences from heterogeneous clients to alleviate horizontal inconsistency, and dynamically adjusts aggregation weights according to client participation frequencies and progress gaps to mitigate vertical inconsistency. By jointly coordinating activation-level and model-level consistency, CoASFL effectively suppresses inconsistency propagation during asynchronous training. Extensive experiments on an 80-device heterogeneous edge testbed demonstrate that CoASFL consistently outperforms state-of-the-art SFL approaches, accelerating training by 1.61$\times$ to 3.74$\times$ and improving final model accuracy by up to 3.26\% under heterogeneous scenarios.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26992
Contextual automatic speech recognition (ASR) improves rare-entity recognition by supplying candidate hotwords, but retrieved candidates may be incomplete or incorrect. A reliable system must therefore exploit a relevant candidate without allowing unsupported alternatives to override the acoustic evidence. We propose a context-steered reasoning framework that generates a short, audio-grounded caption before transcription. This task-specific representation lets the model assess candidate relevance before making a lexical decision. Supervised fine-tuning establishes the structured caption-to-transcription behavior, while targeted trajectory injection strengthens group relative policy optimization when difficult utterances yield only unsuccessful rollouts. Experiments across diverse context conditions show that the proposed method consistently improves both transcription quality and hotword recognition while remaining robust to irrelevant candidates.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26986
Auxiliary learning (AL), which can improve the performance of a primary task by leveraging related auxiliary tasks, is commonly regarded as a special case of multi-task learning. Existing AL approaches typically require manually annotated auxiliary labels, increasing annotation costs, particularly in medical imaging where expert labeling is expensive. In this work, we investigate whether segmentation performance can be improved using auxiliary tasks whose labels are automatically derived from existing segmentation annotations, requiring no additional manual labeling. To address this, we propose a novel auxiliary learning framework, formulated as a bilevel optimization problem. Our method enables effective knowledge transfer between tasks via a feature communication module, enhancing the primary segmentation task. We evaluate the method on three medical image segmentation benchmarks under limited-label settings. The results demonstrate consistent improvements over state-of-the-art methods, achieving superior label efficiency. The code is publicly available at this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26954
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is increasingly served across geo-distributed cloud and edge infrastructures, where wide-area latency, cross-region egress cost, and data-residency rules compete with retrieval quality. Conventional pipelines rank by semantic similarity alone and ignore where content lives, inflating tail latency and cost. We formalize the Geo-RAG Selection Problem (GRaSP), a drop-in re-scoring layer that decays relevance by latency and adds an optional cost penalty under a cardinality budget and per-region caps, with no retraining. We first settle its complexity: the base formulation is a linear objective over a partition matroid, solved optimally by an O(N log N) greedy algorithm, rather than NP-hard as a knapsack framing suggests, with hardness entering only under an additive egress budget. On a five-node CloudLab testbed emulating a four-region WAN over the Natural Questions corpus (2.68M passages), GRaSP's benefit is placement-dependent: under uniform placement it cuts fetch latency at negligible quality cost; under topical (residency-like) placement it traces a recall-latency Pareto frontier that dominates relevance-only, nearest-k, and a latency-budgeted baseline. At a moderate latency setting, GRaSP lowers P90 fetch latency by 41% while retaining 78% of relevance-only's recall, with sub-millisecond selection overhead, stable to 200 queries/s. Findings generalize across four public BEIR benchmarks. In end-to-end question answering, GRaSP reduces context-fetch latency by 43% while remaining within 0.062 absolute EM of relevance-only retrieval.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26938
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents in non-verifiable domains such as financial services, where they must interpret user intent, rewrite queries, and retrieve information under domain-specific constraints. Although reinforcement learning (RL) can train such agents from the consequences of their actions, recent successes largely rely on verifiable tasks with automatically computed binary rewards. In non-verifiable retrieval tasks, assessing query quality requires scarce subject-matter expert (SME) judgment that is inherently graded rather than binary. With Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), sparse rewards yield no useful learning signal when all sampled outputs within a group receive the same outcome, causing optimization to stall. We introduce a method that converts a small, fixed investment of SME judgment into a dense reward and combines it with retrieval-based metrics to form a hybrid, GRPO-compatible training signal. Experiments show improvements of up to 6\% in Recall@3 and 6.7\% in MRR@3 compared with sparse-reward baselines.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26932
Large language models (LLMs) possess broad factual knowledge and strong reasoning capabilities, but solving complex tasks also requires procedural knowledge about how to act. Existing approaches often represent procedural knowledge through trajectories or bundled skills, limiting flexible reuse across interaction histories. This paper introduces Procedural Atoms, fine-grained and independently applicable units that represent Intent, When, Do, and Avoid guidance. Building on this representation, we propose AtomSD, an Atom-guided Self-Distillation framework in which the learner continually extracts Procedural Atoms from its own successful trajectories and distills them into the evolving policy through Atom-conditioned supervision and task-reward optimization. Comprehensive experiments show that AtomSD consistently outperforms strong reward-based and distillation methods, exceeding the state-of-the-art baseline by up to 9.31 points in average performance. Further analyses demonstrate that the proposed Procedural Atoms provide effective guidance, highlighting the value of atom-level procedural knowledge for policy learning.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26926
Pluralistic alignment requires AI systems to learn from diverse populations whose preferences may reflect heterogeneous or even conflicting objectives, and to personalize their behavior to individual users. Existing approaches in pluralistic alignment often assume access to annotator identities and rely on powerful pretrained representations to model individual preference variations. We propose Preference-PCA Pluralistic Learning (P3L), a novel framework for pluralistic alignment that jointly learns trajectory embeddings and the shared basis of preference directions via PCA decomposition from heterogeneous crowd feedback without requiring annotator identities. At test time, our approach enables rapid and accurate personalized reward learning and downstream policy optimization. Experiments across multiple embodied control tasks demonstrate that P3L enables steerable personal alignment that generalizes beyond the offline dataset to out-of-distribution new users and attains competitive RL and test performance, while substantially reducing computational cost and supporting variable adaptation query budgets.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26914
In generalized few-shot 3D point cloud segmentation, support annotations are often compromised by sparsity and occlusion. Blindly adapting to such low quality samples risks learning spurious geometric patterns rather than robust novel concepts. Although 3D Vision-Language Models have been introduced to sup plement supervision, the potential of uncertainty to actively govern adaptation dynamics remains underexplored. Existing signal-level methods like loss reweight ing fail to prevent unreliable episodes from steering the optimization trajectory. To address this, we propose Uncertainty-Gated Adaptive (UGA), to the best of our knowledge the first framework that elevates uncertainty to update-level gating for generalized few-shot 3D point cloud segmentation. The core mod ule, Uncertainty-Gated Update (UG-Update), estimates episodic reliability via intra-class dispersion over merged support and pseudo-labeled novel supervision, and selectively gates residual gradient updates. This encourages the model to learn novel semantics from reliable episodes while attenuating updates during unreliable ones. Complementing this, we introduce an Uncertainty-Based Pseudo Label Filter (UB-Filter) to enforce learning from high-confidence dense signals. On ScanNet200 and ScanNet++ (1-/5-shot), UGA sets new state of the art with an average +3.08 HM IoU over the strongest prior baseline.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26909
Recent studies have proposed reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) methods that enable LLMs to generate high-quality RTL circuits from natural-language specifications. Existing approaches optimize circuit PPA (Power, Performance, Area) by aggregating multiple objectives into a single scalar reward, making it difficult to simultaneously generate diverse Pareto-optimal solutions across different trade-offs such as low power, low latency, and small area. However, in practical design, the relative importance of each objective varies depending on product requirements and design constraints; thus, obtaining a diverse and high-quality candidate set is beneficial in that designers can choose a preferred trade-off a posteriori. In this work, we are the first to propose a learning method for LLM-based circuit generation that optimizes, not the quality of a single circuit, but the quality and diversity of the entire circuit set obtained through multiple generations in the PPA objective space. The proposed method consists of (1) a generation-based training pipeline that reformulates coverage improvement of the entire Pareto solution set into a sequential circuit generation problem, and (2) a reward function based on Hypervolume Contribution (HVC) that measures how much a generated circuit contributes to the Pareto front. Evaluation on the RTLLM v2 benchmark shows that the proposed method achieves +13.3 percentage points in relative Hypervolume over a baseline without PPA optimization and +14.4 percentage points over a single-objective reinforcement learning method, while also demonstrating superiority in circuit diversity.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26904
Coding agents can now implement a specification, write and run tests, repair failures, and declare the result ready for release. When the same agentic system produces both the software and the evidence of its correctness, a passing test suite is no longer independent evidence: visible tests become an optimization target, code and tests may share one misinterpretation of the specification, and the builder's own tests may simply be incomplete. This paper argues that agent-produced software requires an assurance plane that is structurally independent of the build plane. We characterize four gaps between stakeholder intent and production (requirement, conformance, evaluation, and model gaps) and identify which of them verification can close. We propose a framework that separates building from verifying, introduces a Verification Contract stating what must be demonstrated before release, and organizes verification in a specification-first phase without access to the implementation and an implementation-aware phase based on mutation analysis, property-based testing, and fuzzing, with an assurance report that leaves the release decision to a human. We evaluate the framework in a pre-registered study on three stateful services, two of them written by third-party models, and an EvalPlus pilot. The builder's programs were correct, but its own tests missed subtle interactions: a verifier in a fresh context detected more of the 46 seeded faults than the builder's tests (Holm-corrected p = 0.006) and surfaced the ambiguities of the specification, at the price of rare false oracles. A verifier from another provider did not add detection.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28667
Large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) are usually frozen after deployment, so they do not learn from the cases they solve. This is especially concerning in medicine, where new clinical evidence, updated guidelines, and new therapies can change established practice. Fine-tuning can update the model, but it requires access to model weights and additional training. Parameter-free methods avoid training, but they may overfit a fixed validation set, lack reliable domain knowledge, or lose visual details by saving experience only as text. To address these limitations, we present a model-agnostic framework that allows frozen LLMs and VLMs to learn from deployment experience through three forms of external expertise: a Skill that guides reasoning and tool use, a Knowledge Memory that stores reliable facts supported by earlier cases or trusted external evidence, and a Multimodal Knowledge Base that keeps visual examples and guides the model to relate each retrieved case to the current image. Instead of relying on a fixed validation set, a validation strategy keeps an update only if it helps on new cases without degrading performance on earlier ones. Across six benchmarks covering clinical diagnosis, clinical workflows, medical reasoning, and medical and non-medical visual reasoning, and with four open-weight and closed-source base models, our framework improves performance during online deployment by up to 34.2% over the base model on medical tasks, generalizes to unseen cases, transfers to other models without further optimization, and works in non-medical domains.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09146