Abstract
Multimodal sentiment analysis (MSA) aims to infer sentiment by integrating linguistic, acoustic, and visual information. However, many fusion methods integrate modality-specific representations and cross-modal interactions into joint representations, making it difficult to determine whether predictive utility arises from a modality itself or from its interactions with others. More fundamentally, a modality's standalone predictive utility may not faithfully reflect its interaction-conditioned predictive utility. To address this issue, we propose I$^2$-KAN, an interpretable multi-pathway framework that explicitly maintains intra-modal and pairwise inter-modal information in separate structural pathways. Each pathway is refined by a Task-Decoupled Linear-Gated Denoising Bottleneck (TDL-GDB) to learn compact and task-relevant representations, followed by structured Kolmogorov-Arnold Network fusion that retains explicit pathway associations and supports multi-level interpretation. Extensive experiments on CMU-MOSI, CMU-MOSEI, and CH-SIMS v2 demonstrate strong overall performance. Ablation and interpretability analyses consistently show across the three benchmarks that low standalone predictive utility does not necessarily imply low interaction-conditioned predictive utility: a modality that appears weak in isolation can remain informative through pairwise interactions. These findings highlight the interaction-dependent nature of multimodal utility and suggest that modality utility should be characterized from both standalone and interaction-conditioned perspectives.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31087
