Abstract
Curriculum learning orders samples by difficulty, but difficulty alone does not establish supervision reliability for dense prediction. Easy samples can expose shortcuts, hard samples can be informative, and noisy or ambiguous samples can mislead training. Building on our conference method CurriSeg, we present PaceShift, a stabilize-then-challenge paradigm combining supervision-adaptive curriculum selection with guarded spectral post-training. A learning-dynamics view motivates separating supervision reliability from temporal update value and applying spectral challenges after stabilization. The first phase estimates reliability from available supervision, augmentation consistency, model disagreement, and prediction certainty. Temporal statistics guide sample weighting, while pixel-uncertainty weights reduce the early influence of uncertain regions. The second phase ranks predictions from multiple spectral views using supervision agreement, robustness, reference consistency, and penalties. A pairwise preference objective measured against the frozen Phase-I reference, together with an anchor, refines the prediction. The framework supports full, weak, semi-supervised, and model-derived supervision. Experiments across context-entangled content segmentation (CECS), broader dense-prediction tasks, and foundation-model and cross-modal adaptations show accuracy gains. Targeted diagnostics indicate improved pooled calibration and corruption robustness in the evaluated settings. PaceShift preserves the deployed architecture and adds no inference computation. Code will be publicly released.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29519
