Abstract
We introduce MVGraph, a benchmark for evaluating large vision-language models (LVLMs) on multi-graph reasoning where the evidence required by a query is distributed across multiple interrelated visual graph views. Although such evidence commonly resides in source-specific graphs, temporal snapshots, or local observations, existing graph reasoning benchmarks remain confined to a single self-contained structure, assessing only graph perception and reasoning while leaving the alignment and composition of evidence across views underexplored. MVGraph comprises 8k instances spanning 8 \textit{graph-theoretic} tasks, abstracted from two multi-graph scenarios (partial and temporal graph views). Each problem is programmatically constructed and verified to be unsolvable from a single view. Beyond end-to-end evaluation, we decompose multi-graph reasoning into four complementary capabilities---Perception, Alignment, Composition, and Reasoning---and design 29 diagnostic tasks with 64k instances to probe each one, along with golden intermediate representations for evaluating the intermediate process. Across 15 LVLMs, we reveal the difficulty of multi-graph reasoning and identify cross-view edge alignment and relation-level composition as prominent bottlenecks through stage-oriented diagnostics. Meanwhile, temporal constraints and increasing view counts expose further capability boundaries. Code and data are available at this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.12961
