Paper Reading AI Learner

When is a closed-form RGB->S/P ratio adequate? A hyperspectral characterization on natural scenes for mesopic display

2026-09-21 16:10:29
Naoyuki Uchida

Abstract

Mesopic and low-light display transforms require, as their driving signal, a per-pixel scotopic-to-photopic luminance ratio (S/P); the exact spectral S/P is unavailable for ordinary RGB content, so a low-cost closed form that estimates S/P from a linear-RGB triplet is used in its place. Such closed forms exist but have been characterized only on narrowband / LED sources, i.e. spectrally sparse spectra, where a relative error of ~41% has been reported for a three-channel projection. Display content, however, is natural and broadband. We ask whether the same closed form is adequate there, using per-pixel spectral S/P from hyperspectral imagery as ground truth. On a daylight radiance time-series, a six-scalar closed form (three photopic and three scotopic channel weights) reproduces spectral S/P with a median error of ~0.07 that is time-invariant once the RGB input is chromatically adapted to D65; evaluated in un-adapted sRGB the error instead carries a color-temperature tilt across illuminants (~0.19), so adaptation is the enabling step for this use case. The result generalizes to an independent fifty-scene set (pooled median 0.024; 45/50 scenes within a pre-registered 0.10 band), with the few exceedances concentrated in saturated, spectrally-peaky surfaces that approach the narrowband regime (floral close-ups in this set). The scotopic weight vector is shown to be primary-model dependent, but the value used here is corroborated by a primary-free XYZ projection, and the median error stays within the band across all principled coefficient choices. We do not claim observer-validated appearance fidelity or adequacy on narrowband sources; both are out of scope. Both outcomes follow from the same three-channel projection: it is overwhelmed by spectrally sparse inputs and adequate on spectrally smooth ones.

Abstract (translated)

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.24819

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.24819.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Time_Series Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot