Abstract
Background.. Video-based markerless motion capture promises movement analysis without the cost, space and skin-marker constraints of optoelectronic systems, with particular potential for clinical and rehabilitation settings. Whether validated pipelines yet deliver clinically acceptable biomechanics, and how they relate to the underlying computer-vision research, remains unclear. Methods. We conducted a scoping review following the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews, with a registered protocol and searches of PubMed, Scopus and IEEE Xplore (January 2015 to February 2026; the computer-vision scan was updated to July 2026). A dual-tier design paired a primary corpus of validated biomechanical studies with a complementary, curated and deliberately non-exhaustive corpus of emerging computer-vision work, used qualitatively. We charted study characteristics, pipeline architecture, validation methods and joint-angle accuracy. Results. We included 117 studies, most published from 2024 onward and conducted on healthy adults walking in a laboratory. Pipelines formed five architectural families across monocular and multi-camera modalities; most reported raw joint angles without biomechanical refinement. Sagittal lower-limb agreement clustered around 5 to 6{\textdegree}, generally short of clinical acceptability, while out-of-plane kinematics, kinetics, and pathological or older populations were rarely validated. Emerging computer-vision building blocks (foundation-model mesh recovery, differentiable inverse kinematics, video-based kinetics) were almost absent from validated studies. Conclusions. Video-based markerless capture is not yet interchangeable with marker-based systems for clinical joint kinematics, and it remains barely validated where rehabilitation needs it most: older and pathological populations, out-of-plane kinematics, and kinetics. Mapping this evidence gap onto emerging computer-vision advances, we propose hypothesis-generating design guidelines, not a validated method, to steer the next generation of pipelines toward accessible, clinically meaningful movement analysis.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.18667
