Abstract
Much of the literature on structured image recognition has disproportionately focused on the comparison of classification algorithms. Rather than investigating which classifier performs best, this paper instead asks: what should a classifier know before it ever makes a prediction? In structured vision problems such as gesture recognition, facial expression categorization, and medical image analysis, discriminative information lies less in individual pixels and more in spatial relationships between semantic parts. Raw pixel spaces are high-dimensional, sensitive to nuisance variation, and often obfuscate the geometric structures that make visual tasks interpretable. Landmark extraction provides one form of dimension reduction, but it does not by itself determine the information preserved. This paper studies the post-landmark feature map as the central object of analysis and proposes a systematic framework for constructing and interpreting landmark-derived representations as an, informed, feature-based ``dimension reduction'' step. Using static hand gesture recognition as a case study, we evaluate coordinate, distance, angle, and hybrid representations through perturbation and ablation experiments. The results show that visually variable data exposes substantial gaps between raw coordinate features and their geometrically invariant counterparts, while hybrid representations achieve the strongest overall performance by combining complementary geometric components. These findings frame feature construction as a fundamental modeling decision and ultimately suggests that the question of what representation should a classifier learn from is one worth asking. The code used for feature construction and evaluation is available at this https URL
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00634
