Review
-
Mapping the Emerging Social Science of Large Language Models
2026-09-07 15:08:15Yi Yang, Xiao Jia, Zeyun Dong, Chenzhang Wang, Zhanzhan ZhaoAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) increasingly shape communication, learning, work, creativity, and decision-making, yet social-science research on these developments remains fragmented. We map this emerging field using a curated corpus of 198 papers reviewed in full and a field-scale corpus of 47,719 published papers from five bibliographic databases. Combining sentence embeddings, K-means clustering, within-cluster Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), author and LLM classifications, and structural topic modeling, we identify three domains: LLM as Social Minds, examining socially interpretable model behavior; LLM Societies, examining collective dynamics among interacting model-based agents; and LLM-Human Interactions, examining how people perceive, use, and are affected by LLMs. These domains contain 13 subcategories spanning reasoning, personality and bias, behavioral games, collective intelligence, simulation, trust, work, creativity, and education. In the curated corpus, the three-domain solution is highly stable under resampling (adjusted Rand index = 0.952), and K-means assignments agree with author full-text classifications for 77.78% of papers. At field scale, 13 of 15 topics map onto the taxonomy, while K-means and structural-topic-model domains agree for 73.83% of overlapping papers. LLM-Human Interactions accounts for 78.02% of domain-mapped topic mass, but venue analysis reveals a contrasting pattern: Social Minds and LLM Societies together account for 66.37% of highly cited papers in leading conference venues, whereas LLM-Human Interactions accounts for 76.81% in the corresponding journal subset. The resulting taxonomy provides a reproducible framework for understanding how model behavior, agent interaction, and institutional context jointly shape the social consequences of LLMs.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07598
PDF
-
BlueprintAgent: Constraint-Triggered Targeted Revisits for Simulation-Ready Generation from Scanned Structural Blueprints
2026-09-07 11:29:29Zhouyuan Xu, Chen Yang, Linhao Wang, Jiansheng Fan, Chen WangAbstract
Converting in-service reinforced-concrete (RC) building blueprints into simulation-ready models---structured frame representations that support deterministic FEM export and qualified-engineer review---underpins safety assessment and seismic retrofit, but the process remains manual. Direct prompting of a multimodal large language model (MLLM) over a scanned sheet is unreliable: outputs often violate engineering constraints on beam--column support, span count, or 3D continuity. We present BlueprintAgent (BPA), a constraint-triggered multimodal agent for simulation-ready frame extraction from scanned blueprints. BPA treats the MLLM as the primary reader and decision maker, with OCR and computer vision supplying localized evidence. Its central mechanism realizes engineering constraints as callable validators whose entity-level conflict reports trigger targeted MLLM revisits over the local region---an inference-time control distinct from fixed pipelines and free-form self-reflection. We evaluate BPA on 300 real scanned blueprint sheets from 20 anonymized RC frame projects, against five baselines and six ablations. BPA reaches a macro-averaged Beam F1 of 0.994, against 0.301 for single-MLLM zero-shot and 0.820 for a fixed pipeline; removing MLLM-led axis adjudication collapses Beam and Column F1 on complex multi-sheet projects. For dense technical drawings, engineering constraints are best deployed as triggers for entity-level targeted revisits rather than as post-hoc output filters.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07362
PDF
-
Risk Is Not Review Value: Wrong-Answer Exposure Under Bounded Review Budgets
2026-09-07 06:33:04SangJin Park, Myungsub Choi, Jineok Kim, Minseung KangAbstract
LLM assistants often produce more answers than humans can review before users see them. Most evaluations ask whether an answer is wrong, unsupported, or low-confidence. Bounded review budgets instead ask which answers should be checked first under a fixed review budget. Risk alone is not enough: a high-risk answer may be hard to repair, while a moderately risky answer may be directly correctable from available evidence. For generated-answer evaluation, we model review prioritization as exposure reduction, where review value combines estimated wrongness, intervention affordance, impact, and cost. We evaluate review queues with Wrong-Answer Exposure Ratio (WAER), the fraction of wrong answers left unreviewed, and post-repair residual exposure (PRRE), the fraction still exposed after deterministic benchmark-supported repairs. PRRE uses repairability rules that do not numerically reuse the affordance scores used for ranking. On a 720-item TAT-QA/SciFact stress benchmark, review-value ranking keeps answer-level WAER nearly unchanged at 20% budget (0.605 vs. 0.600) but lowers PRRE from 0.881 to 0.716. These results show that trustworthy LLM evaluation should measure not only error detection, but also how limited review capacity reduces exposed wrong answers.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07095
PDF
-
A Hierarchical Consistency Framework for Auditing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems
Abstract
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is commonly evaluated by whether the final answer is correct. That test is insufficient: an answer can match its reference while the context that produced it contains a direct contradiction, leaving the contested evidence invisible to answer-only review and retrieval relevance scores. This paper presents the Hierarchical Consistency Framework (HCF), a post-hoc, model-agnostic audit of three distinct levels of a RAG process: the knowledge corpus, the final retrieved context, and the generated answer. HCF represents corpus conflicts as source-linked atomic facts, thereby identifying the documents responsible, and returns each Answer Consistency Score (ACS) with an explanation of supporting and contradictory contextual statements. We evaluate HCF on several controlled corpora spanning five domains and 100 query-corpus instances. A human evaluator compares every generated response with its supplied ground-truth response. The results show that the three diagnostic levels can dissociate: the corpus with the highest mean retrieval similarity has the lowest mean ACS, while a structurally degraded corpus performs worse at corpus level but better at answer level. Most importantly, HCF identifies contradictory retrieved evidence in several cases where the answer still matches the ground truth. HCF does not certify factual truth; it makes the evidence supporting and challenging an answer inspectable and attributable.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07075
PDF
-
ARNAI: Artifact Removal Network based on Autoencoding and Inpainting for Robust Spinal Image Segmentation and Measurement
2026-09-07 04:06:50Sang-Jin Park, Jinyoung Choi, Seokwon Kim, Seungeon Song, Insu Park, Dougho Park, Taeyeon Kim, Youjin Lee, Donghoon Yang, Jaeman Cho, Joongwon Yang, Mansu Kim, Heumdai Kwon, Hong Gyu Baek, Dae Chul Cho, Injung KimAbstract
Purpose: This study aims to develop an AI framework applicable for postoperative imaging for automated measurement of spinopelvic parameters on radiographs with robustness to the presence of spinal implants. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed lateral lumbar spine radiographs from two institutions (Internal: January 2017--December 2024; External: October 2021--September 2025). We developed the Restore, Segment, and Measure (RSM) framework, incorporating a novel Artifact Removal Network based on Autoencoding and Inpainting (ARNAI) to mitigate implant-related artifacts in postoperative radiographs. Segmentation and spinopelvic parameter (PT, LL, SS, SCA) measurement performance were assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and intraclass correlation coefficients. Results: When ARNAI was added to a recent Transformer-based segmentation model, FCBFormer, the mean DSC increased to 0.870 from 0.814, with marked gains at L3--L5 and smaller improvements at L1--L2. On 91 radiographs with implants, the mean L4--L5 segmental Cobb angle error decreased to 4.7 ° from 15.6--16.2 °, an average error reduction of 70%. The ICC for L4--L5 segmental Cobb angle improved to 0.54 (Rater 1) and 0.59 (Rater 2) from 0.18, and ICCs for pelvic tilt, lumbar lordosis, and sacral slope all exceeded 0.70. The improvement in L4--L5 segmental Cobb angle error was statistically significant in the internal implant-containing cohort after correction for multiple comparisons. Conclusion: The proposed RSM framework improved automated spinopelvic parameter measurement in implant-containing postoperative radiographs. By mitigating implant-related artifacts, ARNAI improved segmentation and downstream measurement accuracy, with the greatest benefit observed for L4--L5 segmental Cobb angle estimation, where the mean error was reduced by approximately 70%.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07013
PDF
-
AV-SafetyBench: A Safety Benchmark for Text-to-Audio-Video Generation
2026-09-07 03:32:30Suah Choi, Tae-Young Lee, Gyeong-Moon ParkAbstract
Recent text-to-audio-video (T2AV) models jointly generate video, speech, sound effects, and ambience from a single text prompt. This capability poses new challenges for safety evaluation, as unsafe content may be conveyed through the audio track or arise only when the visual and audio tracks are interpreted jointly. Existing safety benchmarks largely focus on either generated video or generated audio in isolation and are therefore not designed to capture these risks. To close this gap, we introduce AV-SafetyBench, the first safety benchmark developed specifically for T2AV generation. AV-SafetyBench comprises a four-axis, 13-category taxonomy and 5,200 manually reviewed prompts that specify visual scenes, speech, and non-speech audio. Our evaluation protocol assesses each output under three views: Full-AV, Video-Only, and Audio-Only. It then uses the Video-Only and Audio-Only judgments to assign Full-AV unsafe outputs to one of four risk sources: Video-Only, Audio-Only, AV-Both, or AV-Joint. We evaluate five open-source T2AV models and validate the automated Full-AV judgments against human annotations. Across the five models, Full-AV Unsafe Rates range from 25.1% to 49.4%. Beyond these aggregate rates, risk-source analysis reveals that, for four of the five models, Audio-Only and AV-Joint cases-unsafe outputs missed by video-only evaluation-account for 41.6-48.3% of Full-AV unsafe outputs for which a risk source could be assigned. In the Cross-Modal Harm Emergence category, AV-Joint accounts for 87.5% of unsafe outputs withan assigned risk source. Together, these findings demonstrate the value of AV-SafetyBench for evaluating T2AV safety across the visual and audio modalities and their interaction.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06991
PDF
-
Large language models in medical time series analysis
2026-09-07 02:28:02Yu Han, Cigdem Beyan, Xiang Zhang, Xiaofeng Liu, Nan Liu, Jimeng Sun, Shenda Hong, Cheng Ding, Vittorio MurinoAbstract
Medical time series (MedTS), including electrocardiograms (ECG), electroencephalograms (EEG), photoplethysmography (PPG), and vital-sign recordings, are central to clinical diagnosis and health monitoring. As large language models (LLMs) have advanced, a growing body of work has examined how their reasoning, generation, and knowledge-integration capabilities can support MedTS analysis. Yet existing studies remain scattered, and the field still lacks a clear view of how these models should be designed, integrated into clinical workflows, and evaluated. This review synthesizes recent work on large language models for medical time series analysis (MedTSLLMs), covering both methodological progress and issues related to real-world deployment. We review model architectures, data resources, and processing pipelines, and prompt design strategies adapted for diverse clinical scenarios. We further organize existing MedTS applications, ranging from diagnostic interpretation and report generation to longitudinal health monitoring and physiological signal synthesis, highlighting task-specific design choices, common evaluation protocols, and empirical findings reported across studies. By bringing together current practices and open challenges, this review aims to provide a clearer foundation for developing, evaluating, and deploying MedTSLLMs responsibly in healthcare. We also maintain a regularly updated list of MedTSLLM studies and resources at: this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22262
PDF
-
A Comprehensive Review of Multimodal Facial State Analysis: Tasks, Methods, and Resources
2026-09-06 03:12:46Xuri Ge, Tianshuo Zhang, Ruihan Li, Hui Ye, Kaiwen Zheng, Junchen Fu, Da Huo, Joemon M. Jose, Hu HanAbstract
Facial state analysis plays a crucial role in understanding human expressions, psychological modeling, and human computer interaction. Traditional unimodal vision-based methods are often limited by environmental sensitivity and weak interpretability. Multimodal facial state analysis addresses these issues by integrating complementary cues from visual, audio, textual, physiological, and other related modalities. This survey emphasizes two key aspects: on one hand, multimodal learning enables contextual semantic understanding for improved facial state reasoning and leverages interpretable language generation to enhance model explainability; on the other hand, multi-task learning allows simultaneous analysis of expressions, action units (AUs), and face-based soft biometrics (e.g., age, gender), effectively capturing fine-grained expressions and improving cross-scene generalization. This survey reviews core tasks, representative methods, and datasets in multimodal facial state analysis, focusing on facial expression recognition, AU detection, and face-based soft biometric estimation, and emphasizing the unique value of language in providing contextual semantics, enhancing reasoning, and generating explanations. The survey aims to provide an up-to-date overview of the literature and to highlight future research directions for multimodal, interpretable, and multi-task adaptive facial state analysis.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.13255
PDF
-
Linear Algebra Foundations of Efficient Attention: A Phase Reversal in Rank Collapse Under SVD Compression
2026-09-06 02:27:01Anjaneya Teja Sarma KalvakolanuAbstract
Linear algebra provides the framework of concepts (matrix rank, singular value decomposition (SVD), and eigendecomposition) that modern artificial intelligence employs to encode, compress, and propagate information through neural networks. This paper unifies fourteen separate peer-reviewed works analyzing the usage of these techniques in the context of transformer-based foundation model research, focusing on three areas of the topic: derivations and properties of self-attention matrices' output rank, compression methods that purposefully utilize this phenomenon, and the low-rank key-value (KV) cache projection and its semiseparable-matrix duality to linear attention and state-space structured models. We were motivated to conduct this work after observing an open problem in this literature: the interplay of the mentioned compression methods with natural rank collapse of the network. With this paper, we report an original finding that using SVD compression of attention projections actually has the opposite effect on the rank collapse of the network: while it strongly suppresses it at initialization, it accelerates on pretrained models (for GPT-2 124M, GPT-2 Medium 355M, and Pythia-160M) with minimal risk of object aliasing artifacts appearing (verified on all compression ratios) and is consistent across four rank estimation methods. A controlled causal decomposition of the effect in both settings showed that the reason for this behavior can be explained by the choice of the subspace SVD makes when compressing the matrix better than the reduction of the operator norm it achieves, explaining roughly 76% of the effect at initialization and 83% on the pretrained weights, providing a refinement to the calibration-aware compression viewpoint and an explanation of why it outperformed naive SVD truncation.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06341
PDF
-
Checkpoints Are Not Enough: Trust Calibration in CoSLR, a Human-AI System for Systematic Literature Reviews
2026-09-05 20:11:23MD Aidul Islam, Malik Abdul Sami, Muhammad Waseem, Zeeshan Rasheed, Kai-kristian Kemell, Zheying Zhang, Pekka AbrahamssonAbstract
Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRs) are essential for evidence-based research but remain time-consuming, requiring researchers to manage large volumes of publications across planning, screening, analysis, and reporting. Large language models (LLMs) can now produce fluent, well-structured review text, which makes it difficult to distinguish synthesis that was verified by a researcher from synthesis that merely appears authoritative. This raises the risk that unverified AI-generated synthesis enters the scholarly record carrying the credibility of a systematic review. We present CoSLR, a Human-AI collaborative multi-agent system that supports the SLR workflow through a modular three-phase pipeline using large language models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), and that places explicit, mandatory human checkpoints on the path between generated output and its acceptance. In a survey-based study with 63 participants, the system was received positively: 27 of 63 participants (42.9 percent) rated its usability highly, indicating that the mandatory checkpoints did not come at the cost of a workable interface. However, a checkpoint safeguards the review only if researchers use it to verify: 22 of 63 participants (34.9 percent) reported that they would trust AI-generated summaries and reports without additional human checking after only a short interaction with the system. These findings indicate that Human-AI collaboration can support literature review work, but that the effectiveness of human oversight depends on whether users are willing to exercise it. This is a calibration problem that interface design must address directly, not assume.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.22248
PDF
-
Memory in Deep Time-Series Models
2026-09-05 10:19:17Minh Hoang Nguyen, Huu Hiep Nguyen, Manh Nguyen, Van Dai Do, Dung Nguyen, Hung LeAbstract
Deep learning for time series has progressed through successive architectural paradigms, from recurrent networks and transformers to structured state-space models, retrieval-augmented predictors, foundation models, and tool-using agents. These developments are typically studied in isolation, organized by architecture or modeling era. We argue that they can instead be viewed through a common question of \emph{how does a time-series model retain and access information beyond its immediate input?} This question is motivated by a fundamental limitation of conventional time-series modeling: information relevant to a prediction may lie far beyond a feasible input window, while compressing history into a fixed-size state can discard information that may become useful later. We formulate this challenge as a \emph{memory} problem and organize existing time-series methods along a spectrum from internal memory, encoded in parameters and fixed-size states, to external memory that is addressable, retrievable, and increasingly maintained by agents. We then develop a unified taxonomy of memory mechanisms and review three classes of external memory, including explicit modules, retrieval augmentation, and agentic stores, under a common framework for what is retained, how it is written and accessed, and how it persists. A cross-cutting analysis maps these mechanisms to time-series tasks and identifies gaps in both methods and evaluation. We conclude by outlining open problems in building memory systems that can selectively retain, retrieve, revise, and forget information as temporal environments evolve. The result is a framework for studying memory as a first-class dimension of time series modeling, independent of the underlying backbone.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.06006
PDF
-
Beyond Final Decisions: A Process-Centric Benchmark for Transparent AI-Assisted Peer Review
2026-09-05 07:30:52Siming Yuan, Xueyi Zhang, Wangze Ni, Tianfang Xiao, Shimin Di, Jia Zhu, Zhuoren Jiang, Rong Tan, Lei Chen, Kui RenAbstract
Peer review is central to quality control in science. However, existing evaluations of AI-assisted peer review mainly focus on the overall quality of generated reviews or the accuracy of final decisions. They therefore provide limited evidence about whether model decisions are supported by sufficient and reliable review evidence. We introduce a process-centric diagnostic benchmark for AI-assisted peer review. It uses (x,$z_s$,$z_c$,$z_r$,y) to represent the paper content, summary, critique, suggestion, and decision. We convert heterogeneous review records from PeerRead, NLPeer ARR-22, and OpenReview-ICLR into process-aligned data. Our benchmark uses direct decision prediction from the paper content (Direct) as its baseline. It compares the decision value of Gold-process variables and Predicted-process variables, and conducts stage-level evaluation, chain-consistency evaluation, and interventional sensitivity analysis. Experiments across three datasets and six models show that Gold-process variables generally have higher decision value. For the main analysis model, the Gold--Predicted gap remains stable across datasets and random seeds. This gap is also reproduced in most model--dataset combinations. Although model-generated intermediate review texts show relatively high local consistency across adjacent stages, the final decisions are not consistently supported by the preceding review evidence. Our benchmark targets AI systems designed to assist rather than replace human reviewers. It provides a transparent and auditable diagnostic tool for evaluating the reliability of their review processes.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05947
PDF
-
From Review to Authorization: Key-Isolated Threshold Signing for LLM Agents
2026-09-05 05:53:51Yu Zheng, Qizhi ZhangAbstract
Autonomous LLM agents can turn untrusted content into effectful actions such as payments and permission changes. If the same process interprets this content and controls a reusable signing credential, prompt injection can cross the judgment boundary and reach execution authority. We present KITA, a review-to-authorization architecture that keeps the user's personal secret signing key and every threshold signing-key share outside all LLM processes. Under threshold signature unforgeability and our system assumptions, compromising the proposer and fewer than t reviewer-signer domains cannot produce a valid authorization for a new action without signing contributions from t distinct domains. Thus, any such authorization includes a share from an uncompromised domain, bound to the canonical action and released only after authenticated reviewer approval. This establishes execution-bound authorization integrity. We implement the complete reviewer-to-executor path with a structured-output LLM adapter and threshold BLS. Six system tests validate quorum gating and message binding at this interface, while cryptographic microbenchmarks measure the online signing path and its scaling behavior.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05901
PDF
-
More Than Mimicking Reviewers: Evaluating LLMs for Pre-Submission Peer Review
Abstract
Peer-review feedback often arrives too late for authors to make meaningful revisions. We study an author-facing LLM system that moves part of this stress test before submission: it generates a broad pool of atomic concerns and compresses them into a short report. We evaluate agreement with historical reviews and, separately, the possible validity of concerns they omit. From 10,000 ICLR 2026 submissions, we use 3,398 manuscripts with accessible versions that predate review. On a ten-paper diagnostic, independent sampling covers 44.9% of historical issues; deduplication and refill reaches 78.7% strict and 84.9% seriousness-weighted coverage, at 3.6$\times$ more requests and 5.2$\times$ more tokens. A hidden Top-32 Oracle preserves the full 79.3% weighted coverage of a 256-candidate pool, but paper-only selectors retain only 40--44%. LLM review therefore provides broad coverage with a large candidate pool but compresses poorly; ablations identify representative selection and matcher sensitivity as the main sources of this gap.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05788
PDF
-
Reducing Hallucinations in LLM-based Scientific Literature Analysis Using Peer Context Outlier Detection
2026-09-05 00:40:55Daniel Xie, Maxwell J. Jacobson, Adil Wazeer, Haiyan Wang, Xinghang Zhang, Yexiang XueAbstract
Reducing hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs) is essential for accurate data extraction from large text corpora. Current methods, like prompt engineering and chain-of-thought prompting, focus on individual documents and fail to consider relationships across a corpus. This paper introduces Peer Context Outlier Detection (P-COD), which uses inter-document relationships to improve extraction accuracy in scientific literature summarization, where papers with similar experiment settings should draw similar conclusions. By comparing extracted data to validated peer information within the corpus, we adjust confidence scores and flag low-confidence results for expert review. Our experiments demonstrate up to 98% precision in outlier detection across 6 scientific domains, reducing hallucinations and letting researchers focus on genuinely ambiguous cases.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.01461
PDF
-
K-Dense BYOK: An Open-Source AI Research Assistant That Runs Locally and Keeps a Hash-Chained Lab Notebook
2026-09-04 23:26:54Aubrey M. Brueckner, Darshil Patel, Yuhuan He, Timothy KassisAbstract
K-Dense BYOK (bring your own keys) is a free, open-source AI research assistant for scientists in any field that runs on the researcher's own computer. The researcher supplies access to a model of their choice, hosted or running locally, and the application supplies everything else: a place for the work to run, a layer of scientific scaffolding, and a complete record. Each project is an ordinary folder, so the data, the code, the results, and the record stay on a machine the researcher administers and can be read years later without the application. Three things separate it from a chat assistant or a general-purpose coding agent. It ships a library of written scientific procedures, guided workflow templates, catalogs of where research data can be found, and reviewer and writer roles the agent can hand work to. It keeps a Living Lab Notebook whose entries link into an argument and are added to but never erased. And it records what happened by watching what the agent does rather than by taking the agent's word for it, in a log the agent has no tool that can write to. That choice targets the most common failure, model overclaiming, in our earlier benchmark of nine frontier models, by making claims checkable rather than preventing them. On twenty interdisciplinary research prompts, scored under a rubric fixed in advance, K-Dense BYOK led two managed platforms on both scientific quality and research execution. Its deliverables were the only ones that recorded the software they ran in, and the only ones that usually arrived with a command that regenerates the results. One of the managed platforms ran the same frontier model and supplied neither. Those environment records were files the agent wrote, not part of the observed log, which does not yet capture the software environment itself. The code is available under the MIT license at this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.00074
PDF
-
RegionFed: Federated Learning for Personalized Query Understanding in Heterogeneous Retail Environments
2026-09-04 17:50:10Quoc H. Nguyen, Ali Lafzi, Abhijeet Phatak, Siddharth Pratap Singh, Rohit Upadhyay, Yogananda Domlur Seetharama, Chittaranjan TripathyAbstract
Retail search systems serve diverse geographic regions with distinct query patterns, vocabularies, and product preferences, creating significant data heterogeneity that challenges both privacy-preserving training and model personalization. Federated learning offers a natural solution for privacy, but standard FL methods produce global models that sacrifice regional performance, while existing personalized FL approaches operate at the parameter level and catastrophically collapse on modern transformers (below 10\% accuracy on T5) due to tied embeddings and LayerNorm interactions. We introduce RegionFed, an \textit{architecture-robust} federated learning framework that sidesteps this failure by operating entirely at the gradient level. RegionFed uses the $\ell_2$ conflict between regional and global gradients as a unified signal that (i) diagnoses heterogeneity, (ii) routes each region to the cheapest sufficient personalization strategy, and (iii) adaptively controls personalization strength. Because it treats models as differentiable black boxes, RegionFed deploys on T5-Small, T5-3B, RoBERTa, and CNN with zero code changes, providing large gains on transformers (where parameter-level methods collapse) and consistent improvements on CNNs. Across three public datasets (Amazon ESCI, Amazon Reviews, LEAF-FEMNIST) and four architectures, RegionFed-Meta achieves 92.27\%, closing the gap to the privacy-violating centralized upper bound (Centralized + Regional Weighting: 92.04\%, $\Delta$=0.23pp, within 1$\sigma$) while providing $(\epsilon{\approx}0.60)$-differential privacy and $\mathcal{O}(1/\sqrt{T})$ convergence.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05403
PDF
-
From Interpretability Methods to Interpretable Models
Abstract
More than a decade in, explainable AI (XAI) for computer vision has assembled a mature toolbox: attribution, feature visualization, concept-based, and circuit-based methods. Yet almost all of the field's effort has gone into building and comparing these methods, and little into the question they were meant to answer---how interpretable are our models, and are we making progress as they evolve? We argue for shifting the field's focus from methods to models, along two complementary lines. One is already within reach: existing tools let us characterize and compare what different models represent and compute. The other is harder, and largely neglected: whether a model can actually be understood by the humans who rely on it---the independent evaluators on whom trust and certification depend, not the experts confirming what they already expect. It can only be measured, not inferred. We review why the toolbox is mature enough to support both, survey the thin body of work comparing models, draw a parallel to systems neuroscience, and close with a model-centric XAI agenda.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05399
PDF
-
Large Language Models for HVAC Operations in Building Energy Systems: A Critical Review of Methods, Applications, and Deployment Readiness
2026-09-04 16:08:05Alexander Neubauer, Tianzhen Hong, Han Li, Mengbo Yu, Amin Darbandi, Yannick F\"urst, Martin KriegelAbstract
Building automation systems generate rich sensor data yet remain insight-poor because heterogeneous point naming, missing metadata, and fragmented documentation obstruct their operational use. This systematic review analyses and codes 66 peer-reviewed studies on large language models (LLMs) for HVAC operations published between 2023 and March 2026. Each study is classified across five application families and three LLM method families and assessed for evidence realism, deployment readiness, and the responsibility boundary between the LLM and physical HVAC decisions. The corpus is concentrated in building energy modelling (BEM, 32 of 66 papers), while load forecasting remains too sparse for subfield-level conclusions. Only four studies reach pilot-level evidence, and none reports sustained operational deployment. No study was classified as ready-now for industry adoption; three were near-term and 63 research-only. Nevertheless, several bounded, human-in-the-loop uses merit near-term trials, including point-name normalisation, document-grounded operator support, BEM workflow assistance, and advisory interfaces around physics-based controllers. Conventional machine learning (ML), model predictive control (MPC), reinforcement learning (RL) and ontology-based tools remain more adopted for high-frequency control, short-horizon numerical forecasting, and well-posed ontology mapping, while autonomous agentic operation and unvalidated occupant proxies remain research-stage. Current evidence therefore supports LLMs primarily as semantic and workflow layers rather than autonomous HVAC controllers. Future work should prioritise field-validated benchmarks, orchestration evaluation under operational constraints, and LLM-MPC/RL architectures with bounded latency and verifiable safety properties.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05314
PDF
-
Commonsense Reasoning in Computer Vision: Foundations, Recent Advancements, and Future Directions
2026-09-04 15:19:37Bahar Uddin Mahmud, Sumit Barua, Guan Yue Hong, Ajay Gupta, Hexu LiuAbstract
Commonsense reasoning in computer vision encompasses integrating visual data and contextual knowledge, crucial for enhancing AI's understanding of everyday scenarios. This understanding not only improves machine learning models but also enhances their ability to interact meaningfully with humans and the environment. Unlike CNN-based conventional vision models, which are designed to identify objects within a specific image, incorporating commonsense knowledge enables models to interpret scenes in a more holistic manner, thereby improving their spatial ability to reason about relationships among objects and actions. This integration not only enhances object recognition but also facilitates a deeper understanding of the contextual factors, ultimately leading to more precise predictions and interactions in real-world applications. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of recent developments that integrate commonsense knowledge into computer vision tasks. We systematically review approaches based on knowledge graphs, scene graphs, neuro-symbolic models, and commonsense-augmented transformers. We also outline current limitations related to dataset bias, knowledge incompleteness, and integration challenges. Finally, we highlight prospective research trajectories in cross-modal reasoning, scalable commonsense knowledge injection, and neuro-symbolic hybrid architectures to develop truly intelligent visual systems.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05257
PDF
