QA
-
P$^3$-VLM: A Point-based Alternative for Grounded 3D Vision-Language Models
2026-10-20 11:08:07Anna-Maria Halacheva, Jan-Nico Zaech, Sombit Dey, Luc Van Gool, Danda Pani PaudelAbstract
Examining existing benchmarks for grounding in 3D VLMs reveals a pervasive "semantic leakage" in the evaluation and prompting protocols: a heavy reliance on bounding boxes as spatial prompts or representation primitives. Because bounding boxes are highly informative of object categories, they introduce a shortcut for the models to neglect visual information during 3D VLM training. We demonstrate this with a "blind" LLM that, prompted only with the box coordinates, can perform surprisingly well. To further analyze this shortcut, we propose point-based grounding prompting - querying models with a single 3D point instead of a box. Under this protocol, the accuracy of the blind LLM drops from 36.4% to 18.0% on ScanNet's Nr3D, and similarly degrades for 3D VLMs (e.g. LL3DA). Building on this insight, we introduce P$^3$-VLM, a novel tri-pathway 3D VLM that supports point-based prompts and achieves 52.1% state-of-the-art accuracy on location-grounded captioning under this setting. To achieve this, we redesign the architecture while keeping it detector-free, scene-centric, and suitable for 3D GS inputs. P$^3$-VLM utilizes three complementary pathways (location-, task-, and context-aware), enabling strong reasoning about scenes without any bounding box dependencies. The key benefit of point-based learning is a consistent improvement across settings: P$^3$-VLM achieves state-of-the-art performance under point-based grounding while also improving robustness, OOD generalization, and performance on ungrounded scene-centric 3D VQA benchmarks, reflecting its reduced reliance on bounding-box shortcuts and resulting stronger visual-spatial reasoning.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28018
PDF
-
Beyond the Evidence Boundary: Behavioral Mirage Under Progressive Degradation in Medical VLMs
Abstract
VLMs for medical image interpretation are typically evaluated on clean inputs, despite the progressive evidence loss that can occur in high stakes clinical settings. Existing robustness studies show that performance can degrade while confidence remains high, but do not establish when a previously reliable model-case pair ceases to behave reliably. We introduce a baseline-anchored framework that traces baseline-correct cases through progressive image degradation to identify an empirical evidence boundary, and define mirage as continued commitment at this boundary, regardless of correctness. Across three VLMs on three medical datasets, only MedGemma provides a sufficiently large baseline-correct pool for trajectory analysis. On VQA-RAD, the only dataset in which the question text varies, language-only answerability is associated with baseline correctness (AUROC 0.677) and with commitment at the boundary (AUROC 0.653 to 0.670). MedGemma's post-boundary behavior is heterogeneous, including direct mirage, correct recovery, mirage dissolution, consistent abstention, and oscillation, with mirage rates of 16.0 to 100.0% across dataset-modality pairs. Despite this behavioral heterogeneity, residual-stream probes decode commit-versus-abstain behavior at the boundary with AUROC of 0.895 to 0.994 under nested cross-validation. These results show that progressive evidence loss can produce persistent commitment that output entropy and abstention behavior do not consistently reflect, motivating boundary-aware evaluation, option-order controls, and improved abstention mechanisms for reliable medical foundation models operating under partial observation.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28000
PDF
-
LongHisDoc: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Chinese Long Historical Document Understanding
2026-10-20 09:06:09Zeyu Shan, Yongxin Shi, Shihang Wu, Peirong Zhang, Yuanyuan Fang, Zhaopeng Wang, Lianwen JinAbstract
Chinese historical documents are invaluable cultural treasures, but their complexity poses significant comprehension challenges for non-specialists. Despite the success of Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) in modern document tasks, their capabilities in Long (full-book) Historical Document understanding remain largely unexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce LongHisDoc, the first benchmark tailored for long historical document understanding. LongHisDoc comprises 1,012 expert-annotated QA pairs derived from 101 PDF documents, with an average of 85.1 pages and 42,776.4 tokens per document. It spans 10 categories and features four QA types: single-page, cross-page, multi-hop, and unanswerable. Answering these questions requires integrating multimodal evidence from text, layout, and visual elements. Our evaluation reveals that the top-performing LVLM and LLM achieve only 62.9% and 69.9% accuracy, respectively, highlighting a substantial performance gap. Furthermore, we assess various modal retrievers and the end-to-end RAG performance to provide references for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. We believe that LongHisDoc serves as a comprehensive benchmark to catalyze future research in full-book historical document understanding. The benchmark and evaluation code are available at this https URL and this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14531
PDF
-
SAPD: Learning from Agent Experience without Environment Interaction
2026-10-20 08:30:30Juncheng Diao, Haibin Wang, Wei Shi, Yifan Ding, Qingbin Li, Rongxiang Weng, Xunliang CaiAbstract
Scaling the training of Large Language Model (LLM) agents typically requires a large collection of executable environments, whose construction, maintenance, and operation constrain the expansion of training experience. Existing offline trajectories offer an opportunity to reuse interaction experience, yet effectively refining the current policy without revisiting these environments remains challenging: supervised fine-tuning (SFT) can lead to catastrophic forgetting, while online reinforcement learning requires real-time interaction with the environment. To address this challenge, we propose Step-Advantage Policy Distillation (SAPD), a method for learning from offline trajectories using relative step advantages. SAPD decomposes multi-turn trajectories into individual decision contexts for on-policy distillation, allowing the student to generate responses conditioned on recorded histories, and introduces relative step advantage signals to stabilize training. The entire process requires neither new environment observations nor additional multi-turn interactions. Experiments on ALFWorld, WebShop, and Search-based QA show that SAPD improves performance across different teacher configurations, mitigates catastrophic forgetting compared with SFT, and runs at least $4.7\times$ faster per training step than online OPD. We will release our code soon.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27847
PDF
-
IndustryForge-27B: A Domain-Enhanced Multimodal Foundation Model for Industrial CAD
2026-10-20 08:03:48Nianchen Deng, Jiaxin Ai, Tao Hu, Shu Zou, Yurui Dong, Siqi Li, Xinyu Cai, Xuemeng Yang, Licheng Wen, Hongbin Zhou, Hairong Zhang, Pinlong Cai, Botian ShiAbstract
Automating industrial CAD design and manufacturing places distinctive demands on multimodal foundation models: the model must see engineering drawings and 3D geometry screenshots, write correct parametric-modelling scripts and Windows COM API code, and cover the full range from single parts to assemblies. General-purpose multimodal models fall short on these tasks, while single-task fine-tuning is too narrow to support the diverse calls that upper-layer agents issue. We build IndustryForge-27B on top of Qwen3.5-VL-27B by curating and integrating six industrial-CAD sub-corpora totalling $\sim$52k multimodal samples---CAD Visual QA (CAD-VQA), parametric CAD code (text2cadquery), assembly-level CAD code (text2cadquery-assembly), and three COM sub-corpora for Inventor / SolidWorks (com_2d / com_3d / com_assembly)---and training with a unified multi-task SFT recipe. Across four CAD-domain benchmarks IndustryForge-27B lifts the base model by $+33.65$~pp on average and outperforms the strong closed-source model GPT-5.4 on all four; across eleven general-capability benchmarks it retains, and slightly improves upon, the base model ($+1.56$~pp mean, no catastrophic forgetting). IndustryForge-27B will serve as the common substrate for downstream industrial-agent projects, providing a unified starting point for a full-stack industrial agent that spans from CAD design to industrial-software operation, from parts to assemblies, and from single-shot generation to closed-loop self-improvement. Huggingface model: this https URL
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.28050
PDF
-
Agents-as-Peers: Bias-Controlled LLM Evaluation as Multi-Agent Peer Assessment
2026-10-20 07:13:23Yanki Margalit, Nurit Cohen-Inger, Erni Avram, Ran Taig, Seffi Cohen, Oded MargalitAbstract
Large language model (LLM) evaluation commonly relies on fixed human-authored benchmarks or centralized human/model judges. Fixed benchmarks can age and enter model training corpora, while centralized judges introduce their own scoring preferences. We cast LLM evaluation as a multi-agent peer-assessment problem and introduce Agents-as-Peers, a distributed evaluation protocol in which every agent generates tasks, answers the shared task set, and judges the answers of its peers, with no privileged evaluator. Self-ratings are excluded from the ranking, and judging is repeated under controlled identity and presentation regimes so that self bias, identity effects, presentation-position sensitivity, and judge severity are measured rather than left implicit. In an instantiation with 12 LLMs and 420 agent-generated questions, Agents-as-Peers aggregates 55,440 non-self peer judgments per regime. Most agents assign their own answers higher scores than those answers receive from peer judges; visible identity changes scores for some agents; the first fixed answer slot is associated with scores 0.39 points higher than the shuffled baseline; and judges differ markedly in severity. On labeled benchmarks, peer scores align strongly with accuracy on TruthfulQA (Pearson r=0.904) and GSM8K (r=0.873). On TruthfulQA, the peer-score correlation is substantially higher than the self-score correlation (r=0.538). A benchmark-overlap screen and item-level human audit further characterize the endogenous task set. These results support Agents-as-Peers as a cohort-relative measurement protocol whose ranking is reported together with the biases and rater effects that shape it. Code and dataset: this https URL
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.02589
PDF
-
E8-QAT: Efficient 2-Bit Quantization-Aware Training with Implicit Lattice Codebooks
2026-10-20 06:17:09Xinyu Lei, Hong Huang, Jiebin Zhang, Hongyu Li, Jinlong Song, Decheng Wu, Guanghua Yu, Jianchen Zhu, Sujian LiAbstract
Low-bit quantization reduces the memory footprint of large language models, but preserving accuracy with efficient training remains challenging. Scalar quantization encodes weights independently, while explicit-codebook vector quantization introduces costly search during training. We propose E8-QAT, a 2-bit quantization-aware training framework that uses the $E_8$ lattice as an implicit eight-dimensional codebook. It jointly quantizes weight groups through arithmetic projection without storing or searching an explicit codebook during the training forward pass. A 2-bit core encoding and sparse extension preserve the selected lattice points exactly, adding less than 0.1\% to core index storage. On Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, E8-QAT matches the performance of the full-precision model in terms of the average score across the four tasks. E8-QAT improves over the state-of-the-art baseline by 2.03\% on IFEval and by 1.51\% on LiveCodeBench, under the same data, schedule, and bit width. The 2-bit representation reduces peak memory by 80\% and supports a $4\times$ larger batch. At each representation's largest feasible batch, E8-QAT reaches $1.97\times$ the decoding throughput of BF16.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27699
PDF
-
Corpus Quality Improves, Retrieval Utility Does Not: An Ablation of Preprocessing and Refinement in a Speech-to-QA Pipeline
2026-10-20 05:11:32Wonsup Shin, Jingu KimAbstract
Practitioners building training corpora with a pipeline of language models keep a preprocessing or refinement (post-process) stage when switching it on raises the corpus quality. We ablate a production pipeline that turns conference speech into question-answer pairs. The preprocessing stage rewrites the transcript, and the refinement stage filters the generated pairs. Switching each on and off gives four corpora from the same 40 Korean medical and finance sessions. On the corpus itself, quality rises as the stages switch on. Four LLM judges and six human domain experts rank the four corpora the same way, and the fully refined corpus leads by +0.18 and +0.22 on a 1-5 scale. We then ask whether that gain carries downstream. We supply each corpus to six models at inference and measure retrieval accuracy. The ranking does not hold. Enabling the transcript rewrite lowers retrieval accuracy by 0.061, the only stage effect that survives correction for multiple comparisons. That stage also reads the whole session, so it almost doubles the cost of one. With both stages on, accuracy does not change. An equivalence test we declared in advance confirms this. The corpus itself is clearly valuable. It lifts retrieval accuracy from 0.231 to 0.748 in every model and domain we test. More than a third of its pairs carry knowledge that neither of two frontier models produces on its own. On our data, the null does not come from weak corpora. A rising score on a rubric of this kind did not predict what the corpus holds for a model.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27652
PDF
-
Self-Evolving Agents through Privileged Retrospective Distillation
2026-10-20 02:13:21Yuhang Zhou, Yifan Wu, Bo Peng, Mingyi Wang, Jiayi Liu, Xiangjun Fan, Lizhu Zhang, Zhuokai ZhaoAbstract
Self-evolving agents aim to improve from their own experience rather than remain fixed after deployment, but naturally collected trajectories often lack ground-truth solutions or verifier-derived rewards. We introduce Retrospective Self-Distillation (RSD), a multi-round framework that turns such experience into dense supervision using privileged retrospective context. For each on-policy trajectory, the same underlying model acts as both student and teacher: the teacher re-scores the student's realized actions while conditioning on cross-task precedents and lessons, together with turn-level reflection and future hindsight from the completed trajectory. The resulting teacher distribution is distilled back into the policy through on-policy self-distillation. Across rounds, the experience bank grows and the retrospective context is refreshed, allowing the model, its data, and its supervision to co-evolve. We further introduce frontier-guided context-policy evolution, where a stronger frontier model proposes constrained edits to how privileged context is constructed. Across ALFWorld, ScienceWorld, and SearchQA with Qwen3-8B and Qwen3-14B, RSD improves performance by up to 59.7% relative to the base model, while frontier-guided context-policy evolution adds up to a further 44.7% relative improvement over a fixed context policy. These results show that naturally accumulated experience can be converted into persistent model capability without ground-truth trajectories or verifier-derived rewards for the core policy update.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27495
PDF
-
Look Before You Reason: Implicit Visual Thinking for Efficient Multimodal Reasoning
2026-10-19 22:11:24Zerui Chen, Changrui Chen, Fei Ni, Jiankang DengAbstract
Vision-language models (VLMs) have advanced rapidly in multimodal reasoning, yet they remain limited on tasks requiring fine-grained understanding of small or easily overlooked image regions. Recent thinking with images approaches mitigate this limitation by allowing models to inspect images through operations such as zooming, cropping, or code execution. While effective, their multi-turn interactions with VLMs introduce redundant token computation and slow inference, and separate region inspection from the reasoning step that depends on it. To address these issues, we propose Look Before You Reason (LoRe), an implicit visual thinking framework for efficient visual reasoning within a single-turn VLM interaction. Given an image and a question, LoRe predicts the most relevant image region, aligns it with the corresponding image patch features, and strengthens the associated key-value (KV) cache entries, enabling subsequent decoding to directly exploit the selected visual cues without additional visual inputs or explicit tool calls. We further employ reinforcement learning to guide the VLM toward identifying informative image regions and leveraging them during reasoning. To support fine-grained evaluation of multimodal reasoning, we introduce COCO-ObjQA, a large-scale benchmark for object-centric multimodal reasoning. Experiments on three challenging multimodal benchmarks demonstrate that LoRe consistently improves VLM reasoning performance with low additional inference overhead.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27341
PDF
-
Unsupervised Tool Evolution for Coding Agents in Data-Lake Analytics
2026-10-19 21:44:32Yuqing Yang, Yurong Liu, Deqing Fu, Manav Garg, Sravan Babu Bodapati, Fatma Ozcan, Alon Y. Halevy, Jiani ZhangAbstract
Coding agents can answer analytical questions over a data lake by discovering, cleaning, and joining the relevant data. However, they discard this work after each question and redo it from scratch for the next one. Tool evolution, which automatically builds and refines reusable tools across tasks, is a natural fit for this repetition. Since a ground-truth label for a data-lake question requires an expert to solve it first, we consider the unsupervised setting. We propose TEAL (Tool Evolution for Analytics over data Lakes), which evolves a library of tools and usage skills for a given Worker agent without labels. Two agents propose tools from complementary evidence, an Explorer from the data lake itself and a Critic from Worker trajectories. A proposed change is kept only if the Worker adopts the tool on a rerun without extra steps and any changed answer is supported by trajectory evidence. We also introduce TEAL-Q, which generates synthetic questions for tool evolution when real ones are unavailable. We evaluate on KramaBench and LakeQA with four Worker LLMs under step budgets, which cap the number of steps the Worker may take per question. With a tight budget of 10 or 15 steps, TEAL improves every Worker on both benchmarks, lifting Sonnet-5 at 15 steps by 9.3 points on KramaBench and 21.7 points on LakeQA. A tighter budget also yields better feedback for evolution. For example, Sonnet-5's LakeQA library evolved at 20 steps and deployed unchanged at 30 steps scores 68.3, above both the baseline (59.6) and a library evolved directly at 30 steps (64.2). Additionally, a library evolved on synthetic questions performs comparably to one evolved on real questions. These results show that useful tools can be evolved without labels, and hopefully inspire future work on what to evolve and how to obtain feedback in unsupervised agent evolution.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27327
PDF
-
TxnQA: Benchmarking Analytical Reasoning and Evidence Grounding over Transaction Event Sequences
2026-10-19 20:25:47Rabimba Karanjai, Yiming Bian, Yun-Shiuan Chuang, Jenna L. Ballard, Zijie Pan, Shivani Shekhar, Yixi Li, Yirou Ge, Avinash Thangali, Richard Williamson, Linsey Pang, Prakhar MehrotraAbstract
Analyzing merchant transaction histories requires dynamic temporal filtering, entity resolution, and aggregation over irregular event streams--operations poorly captured by static tabular or time-series forecasting benchmarks. We introduce TxnQA, an analytical QA benchmark comprising 27 task families (81 templates) alongside a 5-scenario fraud-risk reasoning suite that evaluates both verdicts and supporting evidence over synthetic, privacy-mitigated transaction data. Ground-truth answers are computed programmatically, and model performance is decomposed into format-following rate (FFR), conditional content accuracy (CA), and end-to-end correctness (E2E). Evaluating prompted proprietary baselines and six LoRA-adapted open-weight models shows that adaptation reliably enforces output schemas but leaves arithmetic bottlenecks: Gemma-4-31B-IT and Qwen3-8B attain E2E scores of 0.867 and 0.816, whereas evaluated MoE checkpoints reach only 0.632-0.713. Furthermore, on the 500-instance fraud suite, verdict accuracy frequently exceeds 80%, yet joint accuracy (requiring exact evidence attribution) collapses to at most ~23%. These findings identify schema compliance, semantic calculation, and evidence attribution as three distinct bottlenecks in transaction-sequence QA.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27256
PDF
-
Diagnostic Analysis for Large Language Model Reasoning
Abstract
Reasoning structures (e.g., chains and graphs) are increasingly used for probabilistic inference, factuality verification, and uncertainty estimation, but their structural reliability is rarely evaluated directly. We test whether this reliability holds through a proposed two-stage diagnostic evaluation in open-ended multi-hop QA. Stage 1 tests different capabilities required to construct reasoning graphs, showing that graph reliability varies with topology, prompt design, and model family. Stage 2 uses uncertainty estimation as a downstream test case. Generated-edge experiments show that graph-based computation is sensitive to upstream graph errors, with performance dropping relative to the gold-graph setting. Gold-graph experiments further show that graph structure provides little benefit when used only as prompt context, but improves the separation of correct from incorrect answers by confidence score and enables node-level diagnostics.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27245
PDF
-
Which Agent's Skill Should Change? Group-Relative Credit Assignment for Evolving Multi-Agent Teams
2026-10-19 19:55:19Yanan Ma, Yang Wang, David Le, Chenhan Yuan, Yizheng Sun, Guangwei Zhang, Chenghao Xiao, Chenghua Lin, Imon BanerjeeAbstract
Cooperative language-model agents can improve without weight updates by revising reusable skills, but only if a shared team reward is traced to the responsible agent and skill. Existing methods credit the skills present in each trajectory, yet presence is not responsibility: a harmful skill active in successful runs still earns positive credit. We present \textbf{GRSE}, \textbf{G}roup-\textbf{R}elative \textbf{S}kill \textbf{E}volution, which assigns behavioral credit by comparison: inspired by GRPO, it executes each question several times under the same skill libraries and contrasts the executions to credit agent--skill pairs, with structured diagnosis of failures. On HotpotQA and LoCoMo with two open-weight actors, GRSE outperforms MASkills, the closest prior method, on HotpotQA and every LoCoMo category except open-domain, with the largest gains on multi-hop questions ($+6.7$ and $+3.2$ F1). Its gains rest on better-grounded retrieval rather than answers given without evidence, and its learned skills transfer between the multi-hop tasks. GRSE is robust to corrupted libraries: starting from planted harmful skills, it credits every planted skill with the correct sign and recovers the score of a clean library ($+6.3$ points), whereas MASkills misattributes two and falls below its starting point.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27227
PDF
-
EDMA: Entropy-Driven Multimodal Answering
2026-10-19 18:18:09Emanuele Mezzi, Gertjan Burghouts, Fabio Massacci, Mengyuan ZhangAbstract
Multimodal question answering (MMQA) is based on integrating heterogeneous data sources, selectively leveraging relevant modalities, and ignoring distractors. Existing approaches based on Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) improve performance by splitting the task into intermediate steps, but do not quantify how each modality contributes to reaching the final answer. We argue that quantifying the effect that each modality has on the answering process improves process traceability and final performance. Thus, we propose Entropy-Driven Multimodal Answering (EDMA), which uses logical entropy to formalise multimodal QA as an iterative process of entropy reduction and to quantify the contribution of each modality in distinguishing correct from incorrect candidate answers. This enables the construction of quantifiable answering trajectories, where each step is associated with a measurable entropy reduction. EDMA introduces (i) modality-conditioned partitioning to estimate unimodal entropy reduction, (ii) entropy-driven multimodal fusion to capture complementary information across modalities, and (iii) entropy-based selection of the answering trajectory that minimises the most logical entropy. Evaluated across standard MMQA benchmarks, EDMA outperforms competitive prompting baselines, with average gains of 12.8 F1 and 4.6 LLM-J points over Planning Prompting and 18.6 F1 and 8.3 LLM-J points over Chain-of-Thought. Moreover, EDMA outperforms self-consistency baselines and is competitive with the multi-agent system baseline. Moreover, we show that higher entropy correlates with more false positives and, through controlled trajectory selection, demonstrate that logical entropy serves as an effective, monotonic selector for correct reasoning paths, validating entropy level as a reliable proxy for performance.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27120
PDF
-
Joint Constraint Aggregation for Qualifier-Sensitive Retrieval-Augmented QA
Abstract
Retrieval-augmented QA can fail even when the correct answer is in the retrieved evidence. This can happen when a competing answer satisfies some, but not all, of the question's requirements and is mentioned frequently in the retrieved documents, which can make it appear to be the best-supported answer. To test whether this retrieval skew actually affects the decision, we manipulate it directly: increasing the prevalence of passages that favor the competing answer makes the model more likely to select it. This points to a decision problem that candidate-level support alone cannot resolve. We therefore introduce Joint Constraint Aggregation (JCA), which compares candidates against the same question-derived requirements using the retrieved evidence. Across three evaluation settings and three instruction-tuned backbones, JCA improves overall accuracy, and its advantage grows when retrieval favors a competing answer. Together, these results suggest that when partial matches and retrieval prominence pull models toward a competing answer, comparing candidates against the question's full requirements can make selection more reliable.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27114
PDF
-
LVMem: Image-Augmented Memory for Long-Horizon Question Answering
2026-10-19 18:01:56Victoria Khoruzhaya, Maksim Kalmykov, Tuong Do Minh, Tatiana Zemskova, Yixin Zhu, Dmitry YudinAbstract
Reliable language-guided perception is essential for embodied agents, where questions about objects, events, and their locations must be answered from long observation histories. Unlike conventional visual question answering, realistic robotic settings require reasoning over extended temporal horizons and persistent scene memory. We build upon the view-based memory paradigm and propose an efficient framework for long-horizon spatio-temporal question answering. While existing view-based systems typically store either text captions or visual embeddings, we extend the ReMEmbR-style memory with image paths that link each stored description to its original visual content. To make the stored annotations more informative, we replace uniform sampling during memory construction with an optical-flow-based frame selection strategy (PSFR) and store an object-centric descriptive scene representation instead of plain captions. We further equip a VLM-based agent with an adaptive retrieval tool that returns the image associated with the most relevant caption, allowing the agent to decide when visual inspection is needed. On the OC-NaVQA benchmark, LVMem outperforms ReMEmbR on binary and positional metrics with both backbones and matches or exceeds a 4D scene graph DAAAM baseline on binary accuracy, while operating on a lightweight view-based memory that requires no explicit graph construction.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27104
PDF
-
SciFigBench: A Benchmark for Scientific Method Figure Understanding
2026-10-19 18:00:07Lijia Wu, Zheng Li, Yuxuan Liu, Jingwen Zhang, Penghai Zhao, Xiang LiAbstract
Scientific method figures often provide researchers with a clear visual entry point into a paper's methodology and core contributions, yet their dense layouts and complex information flows are difficult for Vision Language Models (VLMs) to interpret. Existing benchmarks predominantly focus on coarse-grained tasks, such as context-based retrieval or holistic comprehension, overlooking the fine-grained content and inter-module relations within complex methodological diagrams. To address these overlooked aspects, we introduce Scientific Figure Benchmark (SciFigBench), a benchmark for evaluating core capabilities required for scientific method figure understanding. Specifically, it targets three capabilities: dense content perception, visual relation comprehension, and information-flow tracing. For this purpose, we curate 4,352 scientific method figures from real-world research papers and construct 40,670 QA pairs to operationalize these capabilities as measurable question-answering tasks. All annotations are generated by dedicated pipelines and then manually verified. We further propose SciFigCue, a training-free visual prompting module that externalizes arrow-induced dependencies as visual relational evidence for method-figure reasoning. Experiments across open-source and proprietary VLMs show that even strong models remain substantially limited in visual relation comprehension, while SciFigCue improves performance across several tasks without parameter updates. The code and related resources are available at this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27087
PDF
-
Cross-Lingual Reusability of LLM Pipelines: Financial Extraction, Multilingual Reasoning, and Semantic Screening
2026-10-19 17:41:05Joong Ho (Joshua), Choi, Sherine George, Jiayang Zhao, Jayesh Rathi, Ashwin Kandath, Ananya Sane, Vishvak SrinivasanAbstract
Financial institutions increasingly deploy large language models (LLMs) in multilingual markets, raising a practical question: can pipelines developed and validated in English be reused across languages, or must they be rebuilt per locale? We test cross-lingual reusability along three dimensions--accuracy, reasoning-effort transfer, and behavioural stability--through three complementary tasks. Task 1 (cheque extraction) and Task 2 (Mintaka QA with pinned evidence across nine languages and nine model-effort configurations) test whether accuracy and effort settings transfer; Task 3 (FinanceBench pilot, 50 items over SEC 10-K filings in four languages) validates whether these patterns generalise to financial content. Accuracy reusability is broadly confirmed: Gemini 3.5 Flash achieves 95.2-97.6% extraction accuracy across prompt languages, and FinanceBench per-language means span 5.8pp (77.1-82.9%), though the language-difficulty ranking reverses between domains (Hindi is worst on Mintaka, best on FinanceBench at 82.9%). Effort reusability is domain-dependent: higher reasoning effort yields marginal gains on general-knowledge QA but up to 8pp on financial content, and effort configurations that help in English help proportionally in other languages. Behavioural reusability holds: citation-set overlap with English averages 77-79% Jaccard, with no single language consistently worse. Together, these results support qualified reuse of English-built pipelines, but per-domain, per-language validation remains necessary--neither semantic similarity nor self-reported confidence reliably predicts cross-lingual accuracy.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27043
PDF
-
The Bottleneck Is Retrieval, Not Reading: Diagnosing Evidence-Based Generation with RAG for Long Context Question Answering
2026-10-18 09:10:42Debopriyo Banerjee, Owais Aijaz, Ahmer Tabassum, Zhuohan Xie, Preslav Nakov, Veselin StoyanovAbstract
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is the dominant paradigm for grounding large language models in external corpora, but its similarity-driven, chunked pipeline has structural blind spots: it cannot anticipate which passages a question requires and discards document-level context that resolves cross-passage references. We introduce evidence-based generation (EBG), requiring models to return an answer with line-level citations, and a joint Ans+Evid metric that scores correctness and grounding simultaneously. We reformulate two corpora into evidence-grounded multi-document QA benchmarks- MultiHop-RAG and QASPER-MP, a multi-paper adaptation of QASPER with realistic short paper cues, and pair them with a controlled synthetic two-hop haystack and an evidence-augmented NoLiMa spanning 10K-1M characters. Across ten proprietary frontier and three open-weight LLMs, EBG isolates two RAG limitations that long-context models avoid: similarity retrieval surfaces any relevant chunk far more reliably than all required chunks for multi-fact queries, and chunking destroys document meta-information needed to resolve identity-bearing queries. EBG also exposes grounding failures invisible to answer-only evaluation, including incomplete citations in two-needle settings and a widening gap between Ans and Ans+Evid when context contradicts parametric knowledge. Data and code are available at this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26951
PDF
