Object_Detection
-
OneShot: Label-Efficient Detector Weighting for Time Series Anomaly Detection
2026-10-12 05:49:42Seunghan Lee, Jun Seo, Jaehoon Lee, Junhyeok Kang, Sangjun Han, Sungdong Yoo, Minjae Kim, Tae Yoon Lim, Dongwan Kang, Hwanil Choi, Soonyoung Lee, Wonbin AhnAbstract
Time series (TS) anomaly detection (AD) lacks a universal detector, with the best choice determined by the series rather than by the algorithm. Existing methods therefore either select one detector for each series or average a pool of them. However, both assume that no label ever arrives, while a deployed monitor does receive them, since an operator confirms the alarms it raises. In this paper, we propose ONESHOT, which uses a single confirmed anomaly to weight the pool rather than to choose one detector from it. Specifically, we score each detector on the confirmed anomaly, and those scores become the weights of a soft mixture over the whole pool. We show that a single confirmed anomaly is enough to come close to the best detector for the series. Across 152 univariate and 73 multivariate series, ONESHOT outperforms the strongest single detector, averaging the whole pool, and even picking the best detector on the confirmed event. Code is available at: this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.16219
PDF
-
Attention Sinks in VLMs Are Borrowed, Not Seen
2026-10-11 19:20:41Dengjia Zhang, Alexander Martin, Pengyu Yan, Xihan Sun, Jiaqi Li, Benjamin Van Durme, Andrew Yates, Reno Kriz, William WaldenAbstract
We study how to detect and mitigate visual attention sinks in vision-language models (VLMs). Visual attention sinks are image tokens that absorb a large share of attention over the image regardless of the query or task, and they mislead methods that treat attention maps as a record of where the model ``looked.'' Prior work has detected sinks through massive activation dimensions and proposed redistributing their attention, but none have addressed what makes a token become a sink. Comparing six candidate detectors on ten VLMs from four families, we find that only the centered cosine similarity between an image token's key and the key of the language model's text-sink detects visual sinks. Thus, a visual sink is an image token whose key aligns with the text-sink's key. Moving a sink's key component along this direction to the median of the image keys sends its attention back to the text-sink (\textbf{Are Borrowed}) while leaving model answers unchanged~(\textbf{Not Seen}). Building on this, we propose a training-free, entropy-triggered re-look that first cleans the attention map, then crops the most-attended region of the cleaned map and inserts it into the reasoning trace. Cleaning adds negligible computation to the forward pass, and the re-look improves accuracy with a mean gain of $+4.3$ points on fine-detail VQA benchmarks across model families.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15855
PDF
-
Radioactive Feedback: Tracing Models Trained by Label-Only LLM Supervision
2026-10-11 15:09:58Yuejia Li, JunHeng Li, Hao Wu, Ke He, Mang YeAbstract
Conventional distillation transfers capability through teacher-generated demonstrations. LLM-as-a-Judge knowledge distillation offers a distinct and increasingly practical alternative. In the label-only variant studied here, the student generates every response and improves from scalar scores alone. Prior work shows that this non-demonstrative feedback can improve student capability, but it creates a fundamentally different provenance problem. No teacher-generated answer enters the student's training set, so any evaluator-specific trace must pass through a low-bandwidth reward signal rather than copied text. Existing watermarks and distillation detectors do not cover this score-only channel. We introduce Radioactive Feedback, which encodes a registered pattern of behavioral preferences in the rewards themselves. The evaluator applies bounded pointwise adjustments to quality-qualified responses, allowing repeated optimization to transfer the pattern to a student trained by another party. Experiments on code and mathematics show that the registered preferences transfer through scores alone and across datasets, enabling black-box detection against a fixed reference pool.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15685
PDF
-
Adversarial Detection for Pre-trained Classifiers via Lipschitz-Margin Analysis with Certification
2026-10-11 05:33:29Rui Zhang, Xinle Cao, Huazhen Yu, Jian Liu, Youwen ZhuAbstract
Deep classifiers deployed in safety-critical services like autonomous-driving perception remain vulnerable to small adversarial perturbations. Certified $\ell_2$ defenses today face a costly trade-off: randomized smoothing (RS) requires hundreds of noisy queries per input, while Lipschitz networks (LN) constrain the architecture and sacrifice clean accuracy. We take a detection-oriented approach instead: rather than certifying that predictions are invariant inside an $\ell_2$ ball, we certify that adversarial inputs within an $\ell_2$ ball are \emph{detected} --- a guarantee aligned with security-critical deployments where missing an attack is costlier than flagging a clean input. To realize this, we prove a Lipschitz-margin reduction from certified $\ell_2$ robustness to certified detection, which reduces the problem to handling a single Lipschitz constant $L$. We introduce two detector families: $\mathbb{D}_{Adv}$, which estimates $L$ from a single defender-side perturbed pair, and $\mathbb{D}_{lc}$, which augments that pair with a local margin centroid to keep the estimate above what the certificate requires. Both deploy on any pretrained classifier without retraining. With a valid global bound, the detector is fully certified at that radius; with a local estimate $L'$, certification is sample-wise and applies only when our certified condition holds. Across MNIST, CIFAR-10, and ImageNet-1k on four backbones (LeNet-5, VGG16, ResNet-50, ViT-B/16), our detectors match or outperform five baselines (CTT, SortNet, CRM, ContraNet, A$^2$D). For CIFAR-10 with 1-Lipschitz SortNet, our reduction delivers $100\%$ certified detection at the lowest FPR among compared certified detectors; on the standard CIFAR-10 VGG16, our detectors reject all evaluated in-budget adversarial examples, with 62-82\% both rejected and formally certified.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15359
PDF
-
Accuracy and Uncertainty in Machine Deception Detection
2026-10-11 03:38:54Heng-Sheng ChangAbstract
A deception detector is only as useful as the trust its alarms deserve. Like a polygraph, detectors that read a language model's internal activations can catch deceptive responses that look honest. Yet current detectors depend on which layers they read, weaken on broader tests, and do not state how certain their alarms are. This white paper proposes the Machine Deception Detector, which targets both detection accuracy and the uncertainty of detector scores. The detector reads every layer of the language model, learns which tokens carry evidence of deception using only response labels, and calibrates its alarm threshold so that its false--positive rate stays below a prescribed level. An ensemble of such detectors measures the uncertainty of each score and raises an alarm only when its members agree, with a confidence level that sets how certain each alarm must be. The proposed evaluation trains on instructed honest and deceptive statements, tests on five unseen deceptive tasks of Liars' Bench read by six Qwen3 models from 0.6B to 32B parameters, and is designed to also show which layers carry the deception feature and how this changes with model size.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15314
PDF
-
VLCQ: Post-training quantization for deep neural networks using variable length coding
2026-10-10 18:02:45Reem Abdel-Salam, Ahmed H. Abdel-Gawad, Amr G. WassalAbstract
Quantization plays a crucial role in efficiently deploying deep learning models on resource-constrained devices. Post-training quantization does not require access to the original dataset or retraining the full model. Current methods that achieve high performance close to baseline results typically require INT8 fixed-point integers. However, achieving higher model compression with lower bit-widths often leads to significant performance degradation. In this paper, we propose VLCQ, a post-training quantization method that relaxes the fixed-point encoding constraint, enabling more flexible exploration of quantization techniques through variable-length encoding. This approach achieves competitive or improved performance while reducing bit-widths, without requiring access to training data or model fine-tuning. Extensive experiments on image classification, segmentation, and object detection demonstrate that VLCQ improves model compression and accuracy compared with state-of-the-art post-training quantization approaches. For per-channel quantization, VLCQ surpasses FP32 accuracy and Piece-Wise Linear Quantization (PWLQ) on most evaluated models, achieving up to 6x compression compared with FP32 and up to 1.7x compared with PWLQ. When prioritizing compression with limited accuracy loss, VLCQ achieves up to 12.25x compression compared with FP32 with less than 4% performance degradation. For per-tensor quantization, VLCQ is competitive with Data-Free Quantization (DFQ), while providing greater flexibility to achieve lower bit rates across different tasks and models.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15092
PDF
-
InCLAD: A Continual Learning Benchmark for Industrial Visual Anomaly Detection
2026-10-10 16:18:39{\L}ukasz Marcjan, Dorota Wilk-Ko{\l}odziejczyk, Roberto CorizzoAbstract
Industrial anomaly detection benchmarks have advanced rapidly, yet they remain largely static and therefore underrepresent deployment settings in which inspection systems must be extended from one industrial component to another over time. In our setting, continual industrial anomaly detection is framed as a task-incremental problem: each component defines a task, while the learning objective remains semi-supervised. The goal extends beyond conventional anomaly detection, since models should preserve their performance on all components as they are sequentially exposed to new components. This framing is especially relevant because many existing industrial pipelines either assume fully supervised defect labels or study only isolated datasets, leaving open the question of how semi-supervised anomaly detectors behave across a sequence of heterogeneous components. We address this gap by organizing the benchmark as a sequence of related component-level tasks and by defining multiple scenarios, including random, easy-to-hard, and hard-to-easy. In addition to single-dataset continual scenarios, we propose challenging scenarios spanning across multiple datasets. We further evaluate continual performance from two complementary perspectives: image-level anomaly detection and pixel-level anomaly localization. By recasting industrial anomaly detection as a continual benchmark rather than a static train/test problem, our work establishes a concrete path toward studying knowledge retention, adaptation, and generalization in evolving industrial environments.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.15032
PDF
-
CAST-ASD: Causal Attention over Speakers and Time for Online Active Speaker Detection
2026-10-10 07:47:12Pratham Gupta, Haotian Qi, Tushar Sandhan, Gabriel SkantzeAbstract
We present CAST-ASD (Causal Attention over Speakers and Time), a causal joint model for active speaker detection (ASD). Recent ASD models improve performance by jointly processing all faces in a scene, but operate offline, with the full clip available before any frame is labelled. Low-latency causal detectors instead process each face independently. CAST-ASD combines joint face reasoning with fully causal inference. It applies scene-level attention across faces within the current frame and causal temporal attention over each face's history, enabling information sharing across speakers with zero lookahead. Its parameter count does not grow with the number of faces. On MSDWild, where most negative face-frames contain a visible competing speaker, CAST-ASD reduces competing-speaker false alarms by 32% relative to the causal per-face detector it extends, with larger gains as scene occupancy increases. It outperforms all causal baselines on both validation splits while using only one-tenth the inter-speaker parameters of a three-block fixed-roster convolution. Code and models are available at this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14676
PDF
-
Window Size Matters: Benchmarking Voice Activity Detectors in Noise
2026-10-10 05:51:27Alok Kumar, Mohit Srivastava, Anupam PurwarAbstract
Voice activity detection (VAD) sits in front of almost every streaming speech recognizer, yet the choice of detector is often made by feel rather than by measurement. We report a frame-level offline benchmark of three detectors on the test-clean split of LibriVAD-small: the neural TEN VAD, the neural Silero VAD and a simple RMS energy baseline. The evaluation covers 2,214 noisy utterances (about 7.1 hours) built from LibriSpeech, nine noise families and six SNR levels from -5 to 20 dB. At a 16 ms hop, TEN VAD reaches a ROC AUC of 0.917, an average precision of 0.968 and an F1 of 0.913. A sweep over 20, 30, 40 and 50 ms windows shows TEN to be almost insensitive to frame length (AUC 0.916 to 0.919), while RMS stays near 0.75 to 0.77. Silero matches TEN only near its native 32 ms input size and drops to 0.63 at 20 ms. We hypothesize that this is likely caused by our fixed-frame protocol rather than by the model itself. Zero padding, sub-chunk averaging and unreset model state are the likely factors, but we have not ablated them. In a per-condition breakdown of TEN, babble noise at low SNR stays close to chance. We also show that F1 at a fixed 0.5 threshold is a weak metric on this data, because a trivial all-speech detector already scores 0.854. All settings needed to reproduce the results are given in the paper.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14607
PDF
-
Speech event detector: Timestamped detection of non-verbal vocalizations and background sounds for rich speech transcription
2026-10-09 18:49:55Ayush Kumar Bar, Promila GhoshAbstract
Automatic speech recognition produces words but drops the non-verbal content of a recording: the breaths, coughs, sighs and laughter of the speaker, and the horns, music or barking around them. We describe Speech Event Detector, a 5.8-million-parameter convolutional-Transformer model that outputs probabilities every 40 ms for 54 event classes (20 speaker vocalizations and 34 background sounds), together with post-processing that converts these probabilities into timestamped events and a procedure for merging the events into a Whisper transcript. The model is trained on material drawn from seven public datasets whose labels come in incompatible forms: single detected regions, free-text tags with timestamps, temporally strong ontology labels, symbols embedded in transcripts, isolated recordings and environmental recordings. We unify them using rule-based label mapping, recover timestamps for transcript-embedded labels through CTC forced alignment, locating 6,360 of 8,620 sounds, and combine about 168 hours of real annotated training recordings with synthetic mixtures and augmentation using real background noise. Per-class thresholds for two operating profiles are tuned on real held-out recordings, and performance is estimated using two-fold cross-validation. On whole held-out recordings from four datasets, considering the 48 classes with at least ten held-out events, the sensitive profile detects an average of 49 percent of a class's events, covering 67 percent of all 9,367 events, at a macro precision of 0.30. The balanced profile achieves a macro recall of 0.37 at a precision of 0.36, with macro event F1 scores of 0.32 and 0.33, respectively. The detector runs about 39 times faster than real time on eight CPU threads.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14232
PDF
-
Beyond the Snowflakes: Disentangling Weather Effects from Confounding Meta-Factors in LiDAR Object Detection
2026-10-09 17:38:30Yiming Yang, Jeremy P. BosAbstract
Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) is critical for autonomous perception, yet its performance is known to degrade in adverse weather. While existing literature models snow as atmospheric noise that degrades performance, our granular evaluation on the WADS-3D and CADC datasets reveals a counter-intuitive phenomenon: detection accuracy consistently improves as snow intensity increases. Through ablation study and meta-information analysis, we reconcile this by confirming that while falling snow acts as noise, its negative impact is outweighed by a dominant, concurrent factor: significantly increased object point count. We hypothesize that this object point count boost acts as a geometric enhancement, driven by snow accumulation increasing vehicle surface area and a shift from specular to diffuse reflectance. Our findings demonstrate that evaluating perception systems using broad weather-severity bins without accounting for correlated object-level data can lead to misleading conclusions about detector robustness. We conclude that accurate evaluation requires decoupling atmospheric noise from surface accumulation effects and outline future research to validate these physical models. The WADS-3D dataset is available at: this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13891
PDF
-
Improving Semantic Coverage in AI Test & Evaluation through Generative Augmentation
2026-10-09 14:57:12Connor Hashemi, Bharadwaj Ravichandran, Connor Anderson, Shitij Govil, Brandon RichardWebster, Brian Hu, Keith FieldhouseAbstract
In test and evaluation (T&E) of AI models, evaluators typically have access only to a held-out test dataset and no knowledge of the training data or its semantic composition. If critical input conditions---such as time-of-day, weather, or scene location---are underrepresented in this test dataset, T&E results can be misleadingly due to this semantic coverage gap. We propose a three-stage generative AI pipeline to detect and fill such semantic gaps without requiring ground-truth labels of these semantics. First, vision-language models (VLMs) perform zero-shot binary labeling of semantic factors, and an embedding-space clustering step identifies which semantics most affect downstream model behavior. Second, diffusion-based image-to-image models transform existing covered images into the underrepresented semantic domain, preserving scene content while augmenting high-level appearance. Third, statistical analysis of the augmented image embeddings verifies that the synthetic imagery improves dataset coverage before it is incorporated. Crucially, the synthetic data is used only to enrich the test set and no model retraining is performed for T&E. We validate the full pipeline on both image classification and object detection under day/night semantic gaps, showing that the augmented test datasets better distinguish models with and without exposure to the missing semantic, thereby yielding T&E conclusions that more closely match those of an ideal, fully covered dataset. Code available at this https URL
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13697
PDF
-
MixedTruth: Component-Level Detection of Synthetic Speech and Synthetic Background in Mixed Audio
2026-10-09 14:35:37Xindong Zheng, Jiashu Zhu, Ke Li, Dan LinAbstract
Modern generative audio can fabricate not only voices but also the acoustic environments that provide evidence of when and where speech occurred. This capability undermines a longstanding forensic assumption that background sound provides reliable evidence of a recording's provenance. Yet existing detectors produce only a single real-or-synthetic verdict, leaving analysts unable to determine whether the voice, the environment, or both were manipulated. In this paper, we propose a component-level forensic detector, namely TruMix, which classifies recordings into eight categories spanning the presence and authenticity of speech and background. TruMix has a unique multi-path architecture that jointly analyzes speech-oriented and background-oriented spectral evidence, contextual information from the mixed waveform, and low-level synthesis artifacts. This design avoids the artifact propagation inherent in conventional separate-then-detect pipelines while enabling generalization across independent speech and environmental-sound generators. We also curated MixedTruth, a 4,917-hour benchmark covering all eight categories under diverse mixing conditions. Extensive experiments show that TruMix achieves 98.51% AUC for component-level attribution, significantly outperforms ten state-of-the-art synthetic-speech detectors in conventional binary classification, and exhibits strong robustness across four attack tiers.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14141
PDF
-
Measuring Artifact Reliance in Machine-Generated Text Detectors
2026-10-09 13:34:45Anastasia Voznyuk, Andrey GrabovoyAbstract
Detectors of machine-generated text score almost perfectly on scientific-literature benchmarks, implying we can reliably distinguish with these detectors human and machine-generated documents. We looked at ten scientific-document subsets from six popular resources, and on several of them that apparent ease is a side effect of how the documents were put together. A logistic regression using 27 superficial features reached 0.833-0.997 macro-F1, and on the three arXiv subsets it outperformed every detector we evaluate with F1-scores 0.951-0.997. The strongest cue to the detector is the PDF extraction artifact: human texts retain their original line breaks, whereas generated texts are extracted as a single block of prose. This cue, together with three other formatting features, tell the classes apart at 0.996 AUC. To distinguish benchmarks that contain such a signal from detectors that rely on one, we introduce format counterfactuals: just re-wrapping a machine-written abstract without changing a single word reverses 20-27% of a public detector's correct decisions. Normalizing formatting before training reduces the generalization gap from 0.32 to 0.22. On format-clean benchmarks, it also raises out-of-domain macro-F1 from 0.33 to 0.65 for detectors trained on artifact-containing subsets.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13583
PDF
-
Auditing VLM Benchmarks from Existing Evaluation Runs
2026-10-09 13:05:22Denis Degtiarev, Anna Gromova, Sergey Katkov, Artem Mikhailin, Safina Mukhamedshina, Albert Nasybullin, Karina Shaikhutdinova, Artem TuzovAbstract
Every evaluation run of a vision-language model (VLM) already produces per-question artifacts (predictions, judged correctness, metadata) that leaderboards reduce to a single score and then discard. We reuse those artifacts to audit the benchmark itself, and add an audit layer to VLMEvalKit: six detectors that run as post-processing over saved outputs, plus one additional text-only rerun with visual inputs removed, emitting a per-question report. The layer reports per-question findings together with aggregate audit statistics; for the headline quantities, it attaches permutation-null excess where applicable, interval estimates for proportions, and sensitivity to the model pool. Auditing MMStar, a benchmark curated specifically so that the image is indispensable, with three models, we find zero aggregate accuracy gain from the image on 20.2% of its questions. An item-matched permutation null accounts for 17.0%, leaving a +3.2 pp excess (corrected permutation p = 0.001). This excess is concentrated in the mathematics and science categories and is absent from coarse perception, a localization consistent with knowledge substituting for visual evidence; confirming that mechanism would require item-level review. A second detector flags 134 questions on which every model that answered in parseable form picked the same non-gold option, and these candidates peak in the perception categories, whereas the zero-gain excess is largest in mathematics and science & technology. Replacing the LLM judge with exact string matching changes no conclusion, and every scoring discrepancy between the two traces to one model whose free-form answers a parser cannot read. On a binary yes/no benchmark the detectors measurably fall out of calibration, a scope boundary that we measure and report. The audit layer, the prediction artifacts and the generated reports accompany this submission.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13548
PDF
-
RESCUE: Is This Alarm Worth Acting On? Counterfactual Evaluation of VLA Runtime Monitors
2026-10-09 12:38:35David Ahmedt-Aristizabal, Abdelwahed Khamis, Mohammad Ali Armin, Lars PeterssonAbstract
Runtime failure monitors for robot policies are typically evaluated by how accurately they distinguish failed from successful executions. Yet an accurate alarm may arrive too late for recovery, while an unnecessary intervention may disrupt an execution that would otherwise succeed. We introduce RESCUE, a counterfactual framework for evaluating whether a monitor's alarms enable useful interventions. By restoring simulator and policy states at execution checkpoints, RESCUE compares alternative actions, identifies the latest checkpoint satisfying a specified recovery criterion, and evaluates whether acting on alarms reduces expected task-completion cost. We evaluate RESCUE with OpenVLA-OFT and $\pi_{0.5}$ over LIBERO-Spatial and LIBERO-Plus using 128,340 counterfactual branches. Recoverability depends on the state--intervention pair rather than on robot state alone: at $\tau=0.5$, 14 of 66 OpenVLA-OFT/LIBERO-Plus failures contain a recoverable checkpoint under continuation, compared with 34 of 66 under continuation or scripted recovery, while recovery reduces recoverability in other conditions. On the primary strong-policy conditions, favourable detection scores do not establish lower intervention cost. Under the evaluated stop-and-reset model, even an idealised detector can afford only a 2.0--3.3% false-alarm rate before unnecessary resets outweigh the savings from stopping failures early. These results show that monitor value depends jointly on the intervention available and the workload in which it is deployed.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13516
PDF
-
VLA-FAIL: Efficient Task Failure Detection for Finetuned Vision-Language-Action Models
2026-10-09 12:12:11Florian Seligmann, Emiliyan Gospodinov, Enes Ulas Dincer, Gerhard NeumannAbstract
Vision-language-action models (VLAs) achieve state-of-the-art performance on many robotic manipulation tasks, yet they can still behave unpredictably in out-of-distribution scenarios. Runtime failure detection is therefore essential for the safe real-world deployment of this http URL, existing task failure detectors require computationally expensive action sampling, are based on architectural assumptions that limit their applicability to VLAs, or need access to failure rollouts. We propose VLA-FAIL, a lightweight and broadly applicable failure detection framework for VLAs that combines two novel failure detectors with minimal overhead, without requiring failure data. The first, last-layer Mahalanobis distance (LLMD), detects out-of-distribution states by measuring token-wise deviations in last-layer features relative to the training data. The second, action chunk consistency (ACC), exploits the temporal overlap induced by receding-horizon control and detects failures when consecutive action chunks become inconsistent. To capture the trade-off between detection accuracy and detection latency, we introduce \textsc{AUCPDT}, a threshold-independent metric that jointly evaluates precision, recall, and detection time. Through extensive real-world and simulation experiments, we demonstrate that LLMD and ACC capture complementary failure modes whose combination enables reliable and early failure detection across diverse tasks, frequently outperforming significantly more expensive baseline methods. Project page: this https URL
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.21386
PDF
-
Local Diagnostics of Learned Event Representations for Anomaly Detection at the HL-LHC
2026-10-09 11:37:06Donatella Genovese, Philip Ploner, Simone Scardapane, Stefano Giagu, Thea Klaeboe AarrestadAbstract
Anomaly detection, the identification of collision events that deviate from Standard Model expectations, is one of the most promising model-agnostic strategies for new-physics searches at the Large Hadron Collider. Searching for rare events in learned low-dimensional representations removes the need to commit to hand-crafted observables a priori, but sacrifices the immediate physical interpretation those observables provide. For anomaly detection to enter a discovery pipeline, flagged events must therefore be diagnosed locally, both to distinguish potential new physics from mismodeling or detector effects and to identify observables for targeted follow-up searches. We evaluate supervised and self-supervised neural embedding strategies on COLLIDE-2V, a 750-million-event dataset simulated under realistic High-Luminosity LHC conditions, using the reconstruction error of an autoencoder trained in the learned latent space as the anomaly score. Across the configurations and benchmark signals considered, supervised objectives, which exploit simulation process labels during training, generally outperform their self-supervised counterparts and, in their best configurations, improve on an autoencoder trained directly on kinematic features, raising the signal efficiency at 10% background acceptance on all held-out processes. We further introduce a local diagnostic pipeline that fits a Gaussian Mixture Model to the SM latent space, profiles each component through high-level observables without process labels, localizes the flagged events, and ranks observables by their local discriminating power. The ranking recovers the defining kinematics of the held-out processes, while correlating the anomaly score with the same observables quantifies how closely the score tracks them, revealing cases where the most discriminating observable is not the one the score follows most closely.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13437
PDF
-
Robot-WATCHDOG : failure detection through object-centric graph representation
2026-10-09 11:19:25Quentin Rolland, Fabrice Mayran de Chamisso, Jean-Baptiste MouretAbstract
Reliable real-time failure detection is critical for deploying learned robotic policies, yet defining failures explicitly is infeasible in open-world settings. This motivates failure detection from nominal demonstrations alone. Existing methods, however, struggle to balance robustness to benign variations with the ability to capture semantic and interaction-level errors. We introduce Robot-WATCHDOG, a self-supervised framework that models manipulation scenes as object-centric spatio-temporal graphs. Building on this representation, we investigate two complementary failure scores: Trajectory Projection and Correlation (TPC), a non-parametric measure of geometric deviation and relational consistency, and GnnT, a Graph Attention Network with a Transformer that predicts future object states. We evaluate both on a public benchmark and on a new dataset of semantically complex manipulation tasks, across six tasks and ten random seeds. Both scores outperform image-based failure detectors, particularly on semantic and interaction-level failures. TPC provides the strongest performance in AUPR and MCC on both dataset averages, with low variance across seeds. Qualitative results are made available at this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13403
PDF
-
Multi-Modal Graph Neural Network-Inspired Vessel Identification and Tracking for UAV-Based Maritime Surveillance
2026-10-09 08:37:39Chenjie Zhao, Jiangtian Nie, Jiawen Kang, Yuxu Lu, Ryan Wen LiuAbstract
The unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based maritime surveillance is becoming an important part of maritime Internet of Things (IoT) and intelligent transportation systems. It provides a flexible and cost-effective way to large-scale maritime traffic monitoring. However, achieving robust situational awareness remains challenging in practical maritime environments. The main challenges arise from heterogeneous sensing modalities, adverse imaging conditions, and spatial misalignment caused by UAV motion. To address these problems, this paper proposes an airborne multi-modal graph learning-driven framework, termed AMGT, for vessel identification and tracking in UAV-assisted maritime IoT. Specifically, visible and infrared images are first aligned and fused through a multi-parameter perspective transformation model. This improves visual perception under low visibility and complex illumination conditions. Automatic identification system (AIS) messages are then temporally synchronized using interpolation and linear prediction. To detect small and oriented vessels, we develop a mixed-modality MAir-YOLOv8-OBB detector, followed by the MAir-SORT algorithm for stable vessel tracking. We further design a graph learning-driven association network to model temporal dynamics and spatial dependencies among vessels and between vessels and UAVs. A motion-aware coordinate unification (MCU) strategy is also introduced to reduce nonlinear misalignment caused by UAV motion. Experiments on the MAP-M2UAV50 dataset show that AMGT achieves high accuracy and efficiency. The results demonstrate its potential for UAV-assisted maritime IoT applications, including vessel monitoring, traffic situational awareness, and intelligent maritime transportation services. The dataset and code will be available at this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13220
PDF
