Medical image segmentation remains challenging when targets exhibit limited visual distinction, irregular structure, or substantial variation across imaging modalities. Medical text can reduce this ambiguity, but indiscriminate fusion may introduce unreliable guidance. We present RELiF, a vision--language framework that integrates text through reliability-guided decoding. Its Reliability-guided Fusion Gate (RFG) adaptively controls cross-modal updates, while the Text-guided Skip Refinement Adapter (TSRA) refines high-resolution features using text guidance. RELiF is evaluated on radiographic, CT, and endoscopic segmentation tasks, where it shows competitive performance across diverse imaging characteristics and target appearances. Additional analyses examine efficiency and stability. The complementary uncertainty representation derived from the reliability response also shows an association with prediction difficulty, with higher uncertainty values occurring more frequently in pixels associated with segmentation errors. Code: this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28118
Variable voxel spacing changes more than image resolution: it alters the discrete sampling lattice, tensor geometry, and anatomical evidence available to a 3D segmentation network. While conventional pipelines restore images to a canonical grid, direct-grid deployment requires the model itself to tolerate these changes. We observe that candidate grids are not exchangeable views -- a coarse grid removes more structural information than a mildly resampled one -- yet standard consistency objectives assign them equal influence. We therefore propose LatticeRank, a training-only framework that aligns candidate posteriors in physical space and allocates consistency supervision by voxel-spacing order: among endpoint-matched candidates, the auxiliary loss concentrates on the coarsest requested grid, while inference retains a single network forward with no candidate branch or ensemble. On MSD Task04, LatticeRank improves coarse-grid Extra Dice over mean consistency by 0.03436 across five seeds while meeting the prespecified reference-grid noninferiority criterion. A controlled ladder shows that grid exposure provides the largest recovery, posterior consistency adds a second gain, and spacing-ranked allocation yields the strongest direct-grid result; requested spacing thus provides a simple, model-independent ordering signal for direct-grid consistency learning.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28091
VLMs for medical image interpretation are typically evaluated on clean inputs, despite the progressive evidence loss that can occur in high stakes clinical settings. Existing robustness studies show that performance can degrade while confidence remains high, but do not establish when a previously reliable model-case pair ceases to behave reliably. We introduce a baseline-anchored framework that traces baseline-correct cases through progressive image degradation to identify an empirical evidence boundary, and define mirage as continued commitment at this boundary, regardless of correctness. Across three VLMs on three medical datasets, only MedGemma provides a sufficiently large baseline-correct pool for trajectory analysis. On VQA-RAD, the only dataset in which the question text varies, language-only answerability is associated with baseline correctness (AUROC 0.677) and with commitment at the boundary (AUROC 0.653 to 0.670). MedGemma's post-boundary behavior is heterogeneous, including direct mirage, correct recovery, mirage dissolution, consistent abstention, and oscillation, with mirage rates of 16.0 to 100.0% across dataset-modality pairs. Despite this behavioral heterogeneity, residual-stream probes decode commit-versus-abstain behavior at the boundary with AUROC of 0.895 to 0.994 under nested cross-validation. These results show that progressive evidence loss can produce persistent commitment that output entropy and abstention behavior do not consistently reflect, motivating boundary-aware evaluation, option-order controls, and improved abstention mechanisms for reliable medical foundation models operating under partial observation.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28000
Ontology Learning (OL) from text has advanced with the emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs), but it remains challenging due to the limited availability of annotated training data and the difficulty of adapting LLMs to perform OL effectively. We address this via APOLO - Automatic Prompt Optimization for Ontology Learning, by casting OL as an explicit prompt optimization problem over LLM modules. To obtain training data, we employ a multi-agent system that generates text-ontology pairs from existing expert-curated ontologies. We then propose two ontology learner architectures: a greedy and an autoregressive learner, and optimize both using GEPA, a greedy evolutionary prompt optimizer built on DSPy. Experiments on two ontologies - a biomedical (DOID) and a plant ontology (PO) show consistent improvements after optimization across nearly all model and mode combinations, with autoregressive learners achieving the largest gains. Our results demonstrate that prompt optimization is a viable and lightweight alternative to fine-tuning for OL, and that the autoregressive formulation better captures ontological structure than the greedy approach.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.34540
Medical visual grounding requires models to align clinical descriptions with spatial evidence across heterogeneous imaging domains. However, existing multi-domain post-training strategies typically rely on fixed domain sampling and shared parameter updates, overlooking the need to adapt both which domains receive training and where their updates are applied. To address this issue, we propose PACE-MoE, a policy-guided framework that jointly performs adaptive domain sampling and domain-specific adaptation for medical visual grounding. PACE dynamically assesses the training value of each imaging domain from current-policy feedback and progressively adjusts domain coverage through domain admission, replay, and final all-domain balancing. Meanwhile, domain-specific LoRA adapters route updates to the corresponding imaging domains while preserving the pretrained backbone and visual encoder. This coordinated design aligns training-data allocation with parameter adaptation without modifying the original reward formulation or Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) objective. Experiments across seven medical imaging domains show that PACE-MoE consistently improves grounding performance over fixed-domain training, achieving a 3.64% relative improvement in mean box IoU over the Vanilla baseline. Under matched domain-specific adapter architectures, adaptive sampling alone further improves mean box IoU by 2.07%, demonstrating the benefit of policy-guided domain allocation. These results establish coordinated data-parameter routing as an effective strategy for multi-domain medical visual grounding.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27656
Practitioners building training corpora with a pipeline of language models keep a preprocessing or refinement (post-process) stage when switching it on raises the corpus quality. We ablate a production pipeline that turns conference speech into question-answer pairs. The preprocessing stage rewrites the transcript, and the refinement stage filters the generated pairs. Switching each on and off gives four corpora from the same 40 Korean medical and finance sessions. On the corpus itself, quality rises as the stages switch on. Four LLM judges and six human domain experts rank the four corpora the same way, and the fully refined corpus leads by +0.18 and +0.22 on a 1-5 scale. We then ask whether that gain carries downstream. We supply each corpus to six models at inference and measure retrieval accuracy. The ranking does not hold. Enabling the transcript rewrite lowers retrieval accuracy by 0.061, the only stage effect that survives correction for multiple comparisons. That stage also reads the whole session, so it almost doubles the cost of one. With both stages on, accuracy does not change. An equivalence test we declared in advance confirms this. The corpus itself is clearly valuable. It lifts retrieval accuracy from 0.231 to 0.748 in every model and domain we test. More than a third of its pairs carry knowledge that neither of two frontier models produces on its own. On our data, the null does not come from weak corpora. A rising score on a rubric of this kind did not predict what the corpus holds for a model.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27652
Identifying recipe entities and linking them to ontology concepts is fundamental for semantic recipe understanding. However, food mentions in recipes are often ambiguous, context-dependent, and lexically diverse, making ontology entity linking (EL) challenging. We propose SCODEL, a streamlined, model-agnostic approach based on a central idea: contextual food mentions and ontology concepts that refer to the same entity should learn the same canonical ontology-oriented definition. SCODEL uses these shared definitions as a semantic normalisation layer, providing complementary semantic information to existing EL models without requiring a new linking architecture. We further introduce ReciLinkD, the first benchmark for contextual food ontology entity linking in recipes. Experiments show that SCODEL consistently improves three modular EL models (ReFinED, GSM-EL, and BLINK): SCODEL x BLINK achieves the highest Hit@1 on seen concepts (88.33%), while SCODEL x GSM-EL achieves the highest Hit@1 on unseen concepts (83.15%), outperforming the strongest large language model (LLM) based EL baseline in each setting. Experiments on a biomedical ontology benchmark further demonstrate that SCODEL generalises beyond the food domain. Finally, we use SCODEL to ground food mentions at scale and construct an ontology-grounded recipe knowledge graph, demonstrating its utility for ontology-aware recipe retrieval and corpus-level food analysis.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27637
Current state-of-the-art segmentation models still produce anatomically implausible shapes, such as broken vessels and fragmented glands, on the structures that are hardest to segment. Learned shape representations capture what structures look like and can help correct these errors, but most cover a fixed set of anatomical classes. Extending this coverage across classes and imaging modalities is costly because it often requires new voxel-level annotations. We propose Diffusion for Anatomical Reshaping with Text (DART), which learns a shared shape representation from segmentation probabilities. It uses anatomical descriptions to correct these probabilities without receiving medical images. Across 13 public benchmarks, absolute Dice gains reach 31% for individual gallbladder cases in CT and 10% for individual prostate cases in MRI. Using existing segmentation predictions, we scale a single shape representation from 50 to 377 anatomical classes without new voxel-level annotations for correction training. The shared representation also corrects four lesion classes absent from training and transfers from CT to MRI without retraining. Corrected labels also improve segmentation models, raising one model's Dice from 57.1% to 67.5%. The same pipeline supports annotations for 45,000 CT scans. These results suggest that sharing shape information within and across classes can reduce the need for new voxel-level annotations when extending segmentation to more anatomical classes and imaging modalities. The model is available at this https URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27605
Federated learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning paradigm that reduces transmission costs, mitigates cross-border data sharing restrictions, and enhances privacy by keeping raw data on local devices. Clients in FL systems train local models and share only updates, which are aggregated by a central server. While this setup limits direct data exposure, FL remains vulnerable to privacy attacks. Existing attack and defense strategies have largely been developed for centralized systems, and adapting them to FL introduces new challenges due to its unique architecture and training workflow. In this work, we first propose a model inversion attack on FL systems using Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks (DCGANs) in the context of large-scale medical imaging. Our method operates under realistic assumptions about the attacker's knowledge and capabilities. We then examine the effect of client-side differential privacy (DP) in mitigating privacy leakage and incorporate personalized FL to improve model performance under DP settings. Experiments on the Brain MRI ND-5 dataset show that DCGAN-based attacks can reconstruct semantically meaningful synthetic images, revealing significant risks to the privacy of training data. Applying DP reduces attack success but introduces an accuracy trade-off, which is further overcome by personalized FL at each client side. We also evaluate how different aggregation algorithms affect both attack vulnerability and defense effectiveness, underscoring the critical role of aggregation strategies. The proposed attack-and-defense framework is model-agnostic and applicable to a wide range of FL-based systems.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27470
Accurate head immobilization is critical for medical procedures such as neuroimaging and intracranial radiation therapy, where even minor motion can compromise precision. Traditional methods, such as rigid stereotactic frames and thermoplastic face masks, are invasive, uncomfortable for patients, and require a time-consuming setup. To overcome these limitations, a novel approach employs a 6-degree-of-freedom (6DoF) robotic head holder that is integrated with real-time optical motion tracking, enabling dynamic compensation for head movements without physical restraint. However, implementing this system requires a detailed biomechanical understanding of skull-cervical spine interactions to define safe and effective motion limits. In this study, we conduct a human volunteer investigation using a 6DoF Stewart platform robot to characterize biokinematic workspace of the head-neck system and establish foundational data for human-robot interaction in precision head stabilization.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27336
Medical workflows often require multiple interdependent analyses, but existing specialist and generalist AI models are not designed to coordinate them. We introduce MMedAgent-Plus, a multimodal medical tool-use agent that combines a vision-language planner with 18 leading specialist models spanning 12 tasks and 8 modalities. Through a unified tool interface, the planner selects specialists, executes them in sequence, and synthesizes responses grounded in their outputs. The planner is instruction-tuned on 208,928 samples from 32 public medical benchmarks, covering single- and multi-tool interactions across single and multiple rounds. We separately evaluate tool orchestration, response synthesis, and end-to-end execution on held-out samples. MMedAgent-Plus achieves tool-call accuracies of 91.0%, 98.1%, and 80.7% in single-tool multi-round, multi-tool multi-round, and multi-tool single-round settings, respectively. Given correct tool outputs, MMedAgent-Plus achieves scores of 14.4-14.8 out of 15 for faithfulness, completeness, and conciseness across 600 evaluation samples. In end-to-end execution without pre-supplied tool outputs, MMedAgent-Plus correctly invokes the required specialist in 90.6% of 350 evaluation cases spanning seven tasks. Its final-answer accuracy reaches 0.98, matching the dedicated leading specialist and exceeding the strongest baseline (0.28).
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27233
Clinical care, health-system operations and biomedical discovery depend on extracting reliable answers from patient records, yet applying diverse clinical questions across entire populations remains computationally expensive. Here we present Clinical System One (CS1), a 4-billion-parameter decision model for fast, typed judgments from clinical records, along with two agentic harnesses in which CS1 works together with a generalist language model. CS1-4B is trained on 12.4 million questions and answers from 3.6 million patients across a multi-hospital health system, combining structured-data keys, observed outcomes and language-model supervision across clinical notes, diagnostic reports and patient timelines. It answers multiple typed questions in a single forward pass without task-specific retraining, and each answer carries a probability that can route uncertain cases to human review. On 963,408 held-out patients, CS1-4B outperformed open decision models up to 27 billion parameters on 13 of 14 tasks scored independently of its training teacher. Across 21 external data sets, its aggregate performance approached that of the strongest tested 27-billion-parameter model, with 6.4-fold faster inference in a matched workload. Integrating CS1-4B with a language model agent produced cited answers over complete multi-year patient histories and screened a patient population against the eligibility criteria of 17 registered clinical trials, placing four times as many judged-eligible patients among its top 20 candidates as keyword search while using 690-fold fewer language-model tokens than a language model reading every record. These findings support a division of labour in clinical AI, with small decision models performing repeated record reading and generative models formulating questions and synthesizing evidence.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27099
EHR foundation models promise scalable clinical prediction across health systems, yet their deployment is constrained by a tokenization bottleneck. The same clinical concept can appear as different ontology codes, local identifiers, synonyms, or free-text descriptions, which standard EHR tokenizers treat as unrelated symbols. A model trained on MIMIC-III with a closed-vocabulary tokenizer can use only 13% of eICU events. We introduce MEDIATOR, a discrete ontology-agnostic tokenizer that maps any clinical concept expressed as text into a shared vector-quantized codebook, turning EHR harmonization into open-vocabulary tokenization without manual mappings or a fixed vocabulary. Trained with synonym supervision and guided by enriched concept descriptions, code co-occurrence, and relation graphs, MEDIATOR collapses equivalent expressions while organizing distinct concepts in a medically meaningful discrete space. Used as the token interface of an EHR Transformer, MEDIATOR improves mean AUPRC over the strongest prior tokenizer by 4.0 points (8% relative) on 20 MIMIC-III tasks and by 8.6 points (29% relative) in zero-shot transfer to 14 eICU tasks, where it uses all events. The transfer gain combines coverage and representation, as MEDIATOR remains the best tokenizer under identical inputs (+1.0 and +1.9 points on operational and subcohort-mortality tasks). Same-encoder controls show that the text encoder drives in-domain accuracy, while the learned objectives of MEDIATOR drive transfer robustness and entity-linking quality. MEDIATOR also enables transferable attribution across hospitals.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27047
Auxiliary learning (AL), which can improve the performance of a primary task by leveraging related auxiliary tasks, is commonly regarded as a special case of multi-task learning. Existing AL approaches typically require manually annotated auxiliary labels, increasing annotation costs, particularly in medical imaging where expert labeling is expensive. In this work, we investigate whether segmentation performance can be improved using auxiliary tasks whose labels are automatically derived from existing segmentation annotations, requiring no additional manual labeling. To address this, we propose a novel auxiliary learning framework, formulated as a bilevel optimization problem. Our method enables effective knowledge transfer between tasks via a feature communication module, enhancing the primary segmentation task. We evaluate the method on three medical image segmentation benchmarks under limited-label settings. The results demonstrate consistent improvements over state-of-the-art methods, achieving superior label efficiency. The code is publicly available at this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26954
Treatment planning is intrinsically counterfactual: clinicians must compare how a patient's tumor and survival would evolve under competing regimens, whereas a retrospective cohort records only the regimen received and one follow-up scan. A treatment-conditioned generator trained on such data can therefore reproduce historical treatment allocation rather than simulate the interventional disease dynamics needed to rank regimens. We introduce \textbf{CaMeWM}, a causal medical world model for supported post-TACE tumor evolution and treatment planning. CaMeWM implements one intervention-to-decision loop rather than three independent prediction tasks: it first admits a queried regimen only for clinically comparable histories with empirical treatment support; it then generates a distribution of lesion-local follow-up worlds through an action-conditioned response descriptor, deterministic anchor, and residual 3D diffusion transition; and it finally maps sampled worlds to restricted mean survival time (RMST) with a response-Cox utility model. Under pre-treatment adjustment and positivity, this loop estimates a prespecified, support-restricted g-formula target; all selection and nuisance estimation are fold-local, and the induced policy is evaluated by cross-fitted, censoring-adjusted doubly robust estimation. Across 79 paired out-of-fold episodes, CaMeWM achieves 0.618 SSIM and 0.528 change-map SSIM for follow-up CT transition, while its generated-world survival pathway attains a 0.615 C-index; factual-only AIPW estimates a 9.60-week RMST gain (95\% CI 0.61--18.13) for the frozen policy. CaMeWM provides an inspectable basis for retrospective, support-restricted treatment planning.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26923
Large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) are usually frozen after deployment, so they do not learn from the cases they solve. This is especially concerning in medicine, where new clinical evidence, updated guidelines, and new therapies can change established practice. Fine-tuning can update the model, but it requires access to model weights and additional training. Parameter-free methods avoid training, but they may overfit a fixed validation set, lack reliable domain knowledge, or lose visual details by saving experience only as text. To address these limitations, we present a model-agnostic framework that allows frozen LLMs and VLMs to learn from deployment experience through three forms of external expertise: a Skill that guides reasoning and tool use, a Knowledge Memory that stores reliable facts supported by earlier cases or trusted external evidence, and a Multimodal Knowledge Base that keeps visual examples and guides the model to relate each retrieved case to the current image. Instead of relying on a fixed validation set, a validation strategy keeps an update only if it helps on new cases without degrading performance on earlier ones. Across six benchmarks covering clinical diagnosis, clinical workflows, medical reasoning, and medical and non-medical visual reasoning, and with four open-weight and closed-source base models, our framework improves performance during online deployment by up to 34.2% over the base model on medical tasks, generalizes to unseen cases, transfers to other models without further optimization, and works in non-medical domains.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.09146
Reproducible and analytically robust research findings are essential to scientific progress, but evaluating these properties typically requires costly manual effort. We investigate whether LLM agents can help automate reproduction and robustness analysis, using a medical case study grounded in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, a widely used U.S. cancer registry underlying tens of thousands of published studies. First, we introduce SEER-Repro, a benchmark of 20 published SEER-based papers together with the data and resources required to reproduce their findings. Second, we create an AI agent that successfully reproduces 77.4% of 2,190 atomic claims, while providing executable baselines for further analysis. Third, we develop an agentic analysis pipeline to test the robustness of the medical findings by identifying analytical choices underlying each finding, proposing defensible alternatives, and rerunning the analysis to determine whether those choices affect the conclusion. Across published papers in SEER-Repro, our pipeline identifies potentially consequential analytical choices in 9.5% of fully reproduced findings and flags them for expert review. These results show how LLM agents can support scientific review by reproducing findings, systematically testing their robustness, and directing expert attention toward potentially consequential analytical choices.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23845
Computational drug discovery requires agents to compose scientific operations and adapt to changing evidence and constraints. Here we introduce DrugHarness, an evolvable agent harness coupling composable scientific execution with conditional skill induction. Its environment integrates over 80 scientific operations, biomedical resources and task-specific code, preserving associations among candidates, results and artifacts. From execution trajectories and outcome feedback, DrugHarness induces action hypotheses with observable applicability conditions, recommended actions and supporting evidence. An independent review agent evaluates candidate skills derived from these hypotheses through source verification and, when needed, targeted execution trials. Admitted skills guide subsequent tasks and are revised through feedback. Evaluation on MolBench and SMDD-Bench demonstrates capabilities in molecular screening, optimization and constrained design. Without evolution, DrugHarness exceeds reported MolClaw-CC results by 10.8 percentage points in affinity-comparison accuracy and 55% in mean top-three active hits on MolBench. Retrospective evaluation on skill-development tasks shows that evolution increases Qwen's affinity-comparison accuracy from 62.2% to 81.1% and optimization success from 79.5% to 87.2%. In a prospective HPK1 study, DrugHarness achieves a more favorable median docking score than Biomni among system-specific candidates. A synthesized compound achieves a cellular IC50 of 14.19 nM, a 2.64-fold potency improvement over the best input reference, with activity competitive with two selected compounds designed by experienced medicinal chemists. These results support conditional skill evolution for scientific agents and demonstrate a workflow connecting computational drug design with experimental validation.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23791
Publication count is not study count. A model can identify shared trial lineage correctly in a direct task yet over-credit a second publication from the same trial when aggregating evidence. We evaluate this behavior in medical LLM verification using 14 source-audited clinical families and five model conditions. The families span provenance, clinical applicability, result direction, and composition; the provenance families provide the direct lineage tests. Recognition and aggregation are separate stateless calls, and repeated calls assess within-input stability. Across all three original provenance families, GPT-5.5 identifies the independent update in 10/10 recognition calls per family but over-credits the same-trial report in 5/5 separate aggregation calls per family. Selected Qwen3-4B and Ministral-3-8B conditions show the same cross-task contrast. A study-grouping instruction reduces GPT-5.5 over-credit from 4/5 to 0/5 in each later pure-provenance family. Other model conditions show mixed behavior, and rejected outputs limit several comparisons. The results identify a behavioral gap between elicited lineage recognition and evidence aggregation. The code and data artifacts are available at this https URL.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23721
Jev has attracted considerable attention for its rapid, generalizable decision-making, yet its medical reliability remains underexplored. To address this gap, our study compares various types of system-one decision models across 15 medical datasets comprising 8,742 instances under a unified protocol. Beyond accuracy, we assess decision stability and the ability to recognize unreliable decisions. Our results show that Jev rivals leading models on primarily text-driven tasks but is less effective on numerically driven tasks, revealing a distinct capability boundary. Under question-format variations, Jev maintains strong decision consistency and small accuracy fluctuations. StartLux-27B exhibits comparable consistency, while D3-27B achieves higher overall accuracy and a lower mean decision reversal rate. But these strengths do not extend to reliable abstention awareness: most evaluated models show limitations in both recognizing missing correct answers and using optional abstention. Moreover, we find that Jev's probability-based answer selection can be improved by changing how decisions are scored: normalizing option-wise binary scores yields higher retained accuracy than choice scoring. Taken together, our findings provide early guidance for improving and applying decision models in medicine.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.18529