Language_Model
-
Encoded but Unused: Bounding the Sources of VLM Errors
2026-10-21 05:47:57Anat Veikherman, Mor Ventura, Nitay Calderon, Lihi Zelnik-Manor, Roi ReichartAbstract
In this paper, we investigate why vision-language models (VLMs) produce errors by decomposing them into two sources: visual-representation failures, in which the visual evidence required for the correct answer is not encoded, and visual-utilization failures, in which this evidence is encoded but not successfully used. We propose to estimate the visual-utilization failure rate using lightweight probes and derive theoretical bounds on the true rate that account for probe imperfections. We introduce VELens (Visual Evidence Lens), a rank-based probe that traces visual evidence for both a target object and its ground-truth attribute, such as color, material, or shape, across VLM layers. We evaluate VELens on over 6,000 images using LLaVA-1.6-7B and Qwen2.5-VL-7B. Our method achieves ROC-AUC scores of 0.95 and 0.91, respectively, and outperforms alternative probes in both low-resource and unseen-attribute settings. Using it to diagnose errors, we estimate that visual-utilization failures account for 84.4% of LLaVA errors and 70.0% of Qwen errors, with conservative lower bounds of 77.5% and 61.0%, respectively. Overall, our study identifies visual utilization as the dominant bottleneck in VLMs and suggests that a central opportunity for improvement lies in developing better mechanisms to locate, route, and use the visual information they already encode.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29241
PDF
-
Think-Capture: Active 3D Geometry Acquisition for Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
2026-10-21 05:42:29Junjie Wang, Zhihao Yuan, Yunhan Tang, Sheng Xu, Jiaqi Mao, Xiaoyu Ye, Yueru Luo, Xu Yan, Chun-Mei Feng, Zhen LiAbstract
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel at 2D recognition but often fail to maintain consistent 3D relations across sparse viewpoints, leading to spatial hallucinations under occlusion and perspective changes. Existing methods commonly fuse all frames with dense geometry, incurring substantial computation and context overhead while encouraging blind reliance on imperfect estimators. We present Think-Capture, a query-conditioned framework that first identifies task-critical objects and then acquires their geometry on demand. A 3D toolkit lifts zero-shot masks into a common coordinate frame, and a Symbolic 3D State Abstraction compresses object and camera states into structured text. Hierarchical Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) trains the VLM on cases in which geometry either helps or misleads, teaching it when to use tool evidence and when to fall back on visual cues. Think-Capture-4B reaches 54.4% on MindCube-Tiny (+21.5 points over its backbone), 39.1% on the MMSI-Bench positional subset (+7.9), and 42.8% on ViewSpatial (+5.2). It also remains robust under coordinate and mask perturbations. The full stack fits one 24 GB GPU and serves as an asynchronous high-level reasoner on an Agibot G1. Our code is available at this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29232
PDF
-
DisasterRoute: Evidence-Guided Dual-System Routing for Visual Disaster Question Answering
2026-10-21 05:41:44Tan Zhang, Xing Deng, Lu Zhang, Xiaofeng Zhu, Ping HuAbstract
Visual question answering from low-altitude UAV imagery must deliver timely and accurate judgments to support disaster response under limited edge computing resources. Routine questions may be answered through direct decisions, whereas more challenging questions may benefit from step-by-step reasoning. However, existing research primarily focuses on improving models' visual understanding and generative reasoning capabilities, with limited exploration of efficient direct decision-making and its adaptive coordination with generative reasoning. We develop Disaster-S1 based on a vision-language model adapted to the disaster domain. Trained for option discrimination, it outputs a probability distribution over answer options in a single multimodal forward pass for fast decision-making. We further propose DisasterRoute, a dual-system routing framework that combines prediction confidence with disaster evidence to decide whether to accept the initial answer or invoke the disaster reasoning model DisasterVL for review. By allocating inference computation on demand, the framework retains the efficiency of direct decision-making and improves overall question-answering accuracy through selective review. Experiments on DisasterBench show that Disaster-S1 achieves superior accuracy with low latency, while DisasterRoute further improves accuracy through selective review at substantially lower latency than full reasoning.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29231
PDF
-
Adaptive Steering and Remasking for Safe Generation in Diffusion Language Models
2026-10-21 04:56:49Yejin Lee, Ungsik Kim, Yo-Sub HanAbstract
Diffusion Language Models(DLMs) provide a promising alternative to autoregressive language models through iterative denoising and bidirectional generation. However, their iterative generation process introduces distinct safety vulnerabilities because harmful content can emerge at arbitrary positions and persist across subsequent denoising steps. Existing defenses rely on fixed interventions or aggressive remasking, which limits adaptive control over denoising trajectories and can degrade generation quality. We propose an inference-time defense framework that combines adaptive safety steering with safety-aware remasking. Our method uses a gating direction to continuously adjust steering strength from the current denoising state and applies a steering direction to masked positions to guide subsequent predictions toward safer trajectories. Our method further employs a lightweight response detector after the first generation block to identify unsafe trajectories at an early stage. The detector triggers targeted remasking over generated content and part of the conditioning prompt, and the model regenerates the selected positions under adaptive safety steering. This design combines continuous trajectory control with explicit correction of unsafe content while requiring no modification of model parameters. Experiments on LLaDA and Dream demonstrate that our method improves robustness against diverse jailbreak attacks while preserving benign generation quality and general model capability. Our code is available at this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.13043
PDF
-
norregel: a preregistered benchmark of dated numeric values in Norwegian law
Abstract
norregel asks language models for numeric values in Norwegian statutes, regulations and parliamentary decisions (NOK amounts, percentages, multiples of the National Insurance basic amount (G) and age limits), each at a stated date. The 916 items were extracted mechanically from Lovdata's open data, and each carries the dated history of its provision, so an answer can be classed as correct, outdated, wrong or uninterpretable. We report a first and a second preregistered run on the same items. In the first run (five models, listed publicly only after local analysis), H1, that outdated answers are more frequent for values that took effect after a model's cutoff, could not be tested in substance, and H2 and H3 were inconclusive; Opus 5.5 and Sonnet 4.6 answered 46.7% and 40.2% of the 880 primary items correctly. The second run was preregistered and published before any of its calls, and eight models were analysed. Its pooled primary test supported H1 under the preregistered decision rule (d = 17.8 percentage points, 95% interval [7.7, 28.9], p = 0.0001). In the preregistered sensitivity analysis S8, which counts as outdated only the most recent value that differs from the key, d was 3.9 [-3.6, 12.7] (p = 0.1754), an interval that contains 0. H1 was supported in every other preregistered sensitivity analysis, but S8 is the only one that gives both groups one target value, so we do not regard the support for H1 as robust. The share of outdated answers equal to that most recent value (H2) was 56.1% [46.6, 65.0], an interval that contains 0.5, and the pooled test of a lower share correct in Nynorsk than in Bokmål (H3) was inconclusive. Several models, among them Haiku 4.5, gave mostly uninterpretable answers. Items and keys are withheld; item IDs, per-answer classes, code and results are on Zenodo.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29207
PDF
-
Cartender: Verifiable Language-Conditioned Driving by Learning the Drives Not Taken
2026-10-21 04:44:06Zhiwen Chen, Benjin Zhu, Yan Xie, Jun MaAbstract
Every driving scene is logged once, but driving is one-to-many: the scene determines which behaviors are feasible, while an instruction selects among them. A log records only the action taken, leaving no direct supervision for alternative feasible actions or instructions the scene cannot support. Consequently, a policy that ignores language and one that follows it without regard to scene constraints can fit the same data. We present Cartender, which learns from the drives not taken. Counterfactual Branching constructs matched and mismatched instruction-action pairs from real recordings without a simulator: a vision-language model proposes alternative futures and their selecting instructions, while unsupported instructions provide negative labels. A learned scene-language compatibility score regulates language conditioning in trajectory generation, and a reward-trained language residual re-ranks generated candidates over a scene-based score. The branches are used for training; instruction following is evaluated by swapping instructions under identical recorded inputs and measuring behavior rather than agreement with generated targets. On WOD-E2E, the best of four proposals achieves an RFS of 8.642 across 3,603 feasible instruction conditions. Across 8,974 admitted proposals, mean RFS is 8.203 versus 7.906 for matched logged trajectories, and 67% score higher than their logged counterpart. Compared with matched-only imitation using the same backbone, Cartender improves same-scene paired instruction success from 23.67% to 57.00% and RFS from 6.32 to 7.10; its gate reduces infeasible-instruction execution from 53.36% to 14.18%.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26390
PDF
-
A Unified Evaluation Framework of Physical Adversarial Robustness in the Edge VLM Era
2026-10-21 04:38:02Eric Liang, Alan Luo, Kaiwen YuanAbstract
Recent advancements in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) enable end-to-end visual grounding via language prompts and generative decoding, demonstrating largely improved zero-shot and open-vocabulary detection capabilities. As a result, VLMs are rapidly being deployed at the edge in safety-critical real-world systems. However, the physical adversarial robustness of edge VLMs has not been systematically studied, and the fundamental differences in output with modern object detectors create methodological challenges for fair evaluation. To compare the two families directly, we evaluate every selected representative model on one outcome: whether an adversarial patch worn on a person evades detection of the model. We report this by introducing a unified metric, conditional attack success rate (cASR), counted only on images the model still localizes under a matched gray occluder, and partition every failure into omission (no box), substitution (a box on the patch), and displacement (a box on neither). We benchmark the physical adversarial vulnerability of compact grounding VLMs against a range of object detectors, and find that the VLMs can be as vulnerable as the detectors. We disclose that failure mode is largely associated with the output format of a model rather than its architecture family. Of the three, only omission is visible to a downstream system; displacement and substitution return confident, well-formed boxes, making them potentially more dangerous failures. Further, we find that, under distribution shift, VLMs that primarily failed by omission instead shift to failing more by displacement/substitution. Thus, a grounding VLM can inherit the detector's vulnerability while showing the possibility to adopt more dangerous failure modes. Our code and data are available at this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29196
PDF
-
Reasoning-Search-Augmented LLMs: An Operational Taxonomy, Benchmark Analysis and Controlled Evidence Synthesis
2026-10-21 04:19:06Biswas Poudel, Nilson Chapagain, Amit Kumar, Xianshun JiangAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive emergent reasoning capabilities, yet they remain constrained by fixed model parameters and finite context windows. Even when augmented with static retrieval, they can produce statements that are unsupported by, or even contradictory to, retrieved evidence. This leads to hallucinations, difficulty incorporating up-to-date information, and failures to correctly interpret or reconcile sources. Recent work addresses these limitations by tightly coupling step-by-step reasoning with interactive search, treating retrieval as an action within an iterative agentic loop rather than a one-shot preprocessing step. This study reviews frameworks that implement such reasoning-search loops by interleaving planning, querying, retrieval, integration, verification, and stopping. We analyze these systems through four architectural axes: retrieval coupling, controller design, knowledge source, and grounding strictness. We separately treat the learning signal as a cross-cutting dimension because prompting, supervision, preference optimization, and reinforcement learning can instantiate the same architecture while producing materially different search, stopping, and grounding behavior. We further distinguish benchmark difficulty from RSA-loop demand and synthesize controlled within-study ablations and quality-cost deltas, avoiding invalid pooling across heterogeneous model backbones, retrievers, corpora, and evaluation protocols. Our goal is to clarify the landscape of reasoning-search-augmented LLMs and outline a unified perspective on the design choices shaping future research.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29189
PDF
-
Resuming Vision-Language Inference across Onboard Interruptions
2026-10-21 04:14:43Xiaolong Huang, Yinyuan Zhang, Daliang Xu, Yun Ma, Qing Li, Mengwei Xu, Shangguang Wang, Gang Huang, Xuanzhe LiuAbstract
Executing vision-language models (VLMs) aboard low-Earth orbit satellites enables flexible processing of observation data without first downlinking it to the ground. On commercial off-the-shelf payloads, however, a request may span multiple execution windows: power and thermal constraints, fault-triggered reboots, and competing payload demands can interrupt inference before it completes. Each shutdown discards volatile activations and KV caches, forcing an unprotected request to repeat work after restart. We present OrbitWeaver, a framework that preserves VLM inference progress across onboard interruptions through coordinated checkpointing and recovery. Its phase-aware checkpointing selects recovery boundaries according to the state lifetimes and computational characteristics of vision encoding, language-model prefill, and decoding, balancing storage traffic against recomputation. Its dependency-aware dynamic recovery schedules restoration from partially completed states across the layer and token-chunk dimensions. By overlapping checkpoint and weight reads with recomputation, it reduces restart latency; the recovery planner computes an optimal execution order under its scheduling model within 100 ms. Experiments on satellite payload hardware using on-orbit telemetry traces show up to a 4.07-fold end-to-end speedup and a 3.56-fold reduction in SSD write volume over the evaluated baselines. A 72-hour deployment on two low-Earth orbit satellites demonstrates that OrbitWeaver retains inference progress and resumes execution across repeated bus-enforced shutdowns.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29183
PDF
-
LocalAgent: Collaborative Agentic Verification for Fine-Grained Instance-Level Consistency
2026-10-21 04:04:32Jiachen Guo, Xinshan Zhu, Boyun Wang, Yanyan Liang, Jun Wan, Feng Lin, Ajian LiuAbstract
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have made rapid progress in general visual understanding, yet they still struggle with fine-grained instance-level consistency verification, where the goal is to determine whether two images depict the exact same physical object under varying viewpoints, illumination, and backgrounds. This task requires both global semantic perception and precise examination of subtle local evidence, since semantically similar objects may differ only in small suspicious regions. To address this challenge, we propose LocalAgent, a collaborative agentic framework that integrates the complementary strengths of a generalist MLLM and lightweight specialist verifiers. The MLLM first reasons globally to identify suspicious local regions, which are then delegated to a Local Evidence Verifier (LEV) toolkit for fine-grained appearance and geometric matching. LEV comprises Local Appearance Consistency (LAC), which estimates appearance similarity under illumination and color changes, and Local Geometric Correspondence (LGC), which estimates spatial correspondence under viewpoint changes. LEV returns structured scalar evidence that the MLLM integrates for the final decision. We further introduce an auxiliary-capped reinforcement fine-tuning (RFT) strategy, in which answer correctness dominates auxiliary tool-use and format signals, enabling the policy to learn when verification is necessary. Experiments show that LocalAgent improves mean accuracy by 4.9% over the strongest CoT-RFT baseline while invoking a verifier on only 12.13% of samples and preserving the general multimodal capabilities of the underlying MLLM. The open-source repository is available at this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29174
PDF
-
TeachBack: Learning to Teach via Bidirectional Preference Optimization for On-Policy Self-Distillation
2026-10-21 03:59:23Linfei Ji (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Jiayun Li (Tsinghua University), Haozhao Wang (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Siyu Jiang (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Zehao Wang (Harbin Institute of Technology), Longtao Xiao (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Yu-Jie Yuan (Huawei Technologies Ltd), Ruixuan Li (Huazhong University of Science and Technology)Abstract
On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) enables a language model to learn from a Teacher instantiated from the same model but given access to privileged information, such as a reference solution. We find that access to sufficient privileged information allows the Teacher to generate highly accurate trajectories; however, accuracy alone does not guarantee that these trajectories are suitable for Student learning. Direct access to a complete solution may encourage shortened, reference-conditioned derivations that omit the exploration, verification, and self-correction required to solve problems without privileged information. We introduce TeachBack, a bidirectional preference-learning framework for on-policy self-distillation that learns not only from the Teacher but also how the Teacher should teach. TeachBack shapes the Teacher's generation behavior by controlling the length of the reference-reasoning suffix injected into the prompt and by varying the prompt style. While maintaining comparable Teacher accuracy, it encourages the Teacher to explore and re-solve problems, thereby reducing its reliance on the reference solution. At each rollout refresh, the shared policy generates both a privileged Teacher trajectory and a problem-only Student trajectory. A pairwise preference objective uses privileged Teacher trajectories to improve Student learning, while the reversed preference uses the Student's behavior to shape future Teacher supervision under the privileged condition. Experiments on mathematical and logical reasoning tasks show that TeachBack consistently improves Student performance over existing OPSD methods and related baselines.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29167
PDF
-
XingChen-UniFE: A Unified Generative Speech Front-End via Complementary Acoustic-Semantic Modeling
2026-10-21 03:55:18Kelan Kuang, Qihan Hu, Jian Kang, Jie Li, Yongxiang Li, Yi LiuAbstract
This paper presents XingChen-UniFE, a unified large audio language model (LALM) for general speech restoration (GSR) and target speaker extraction (TSE). The proposed model employs complementary semantic and acoustic representations through a dual-stream encoder, where a self-supervised learning model provides hierarchical semantic features and a learnable acoustic branch captures fine-grained structures from complex spectra. A bidirectional cross-attention module further facilitates information exchange between the two representations. The fused representation conditions the LALM for discrete speech token generation with task and speaker information. Experiments demonstrate strong performance on both GSR and TSE and robust generalization to unseen degradation conditions.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29164
PDF
-
Why is AI-generated language so hard to understand?
2026-10-21 03:54:08Thomas Hikaru Clark, Matias B. Martin, Kyle MahowaldAbstract
There is a widespread sense that AI-generated text has recently become harder to understand. In this study, we investigate a set of psycholinguistic features that are known to correlate with human processing difficulty (e.g., object relative clauses, long syntactic dependencies, low-frequency n-grams). Using a novel corpus of AI-generated text across diverse domains, we find that AI models use these difficult features more often than paraphrases generated by round-trip translation. Compared with human writing, all nine frontier and near-frontier models use more inanimate subjects with animate verbs and more low-frequency n-grams, and most also use longer dependencies, more stacked nouns, and more reduced object relatives in conversation; we also demonstrate substantial variation across model families. We propose and test a hypothesis as to why: while human language is optimized for successful communication, AI-generated text is increasingly optimized for other goals like math, code, and reasoning, in which there is a pressure for \textit{information density} rather than successful communication. We provide a proof-of-concept for this hypothesis by fine-tuning a language model under a length penalty, which leads to a divergence from human-like linguistic behavior. Our findings highlight the axes of misalignment between linguistic processing demands in humans and LLMs, and point toward possible remedies.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29162
PDF
-
AI-Based End-to-End Automotive Design and Software Development for SDVs
Abstract
This paper explores the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to enable end-to-end automotive design and software development for Software-Defined Vehicles (SDVs). Based on our contributions within the Central Car Server (CeCaS) and follow-up EU-funded projects, we present an AI-driven toolchain integrating Large Language Models (LLMs) with Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) to automate the transformation of natural-language requirements into system architectures, executable software, and validation artifacts. The approach emphasizes traceability, consistency, and compliance with safety-critical automotive development requirements. Validation is performed on a centralized vehicle computing platform supporting adaptive cruise control and emergency braking, tested in Hardware-in-the-Loop (HiL) and Software-in-the-Loop (SiL) environments. We discuss current capabilities, practical limitations, and future directions toward increasingly automated, reliable, and quality-assured automotive software development with minimal human intervention.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29160
PDF
-
ORSMT: Unleashing the Potential of Satisfiability Modulo Theories for Semantic Verification and Repair in LLM-Based Optimization
2026-10-21 03:27:02Rui Zhang, Chenyu Zhou, Jianghao Lin, Yaoxin Wu, Dongdong Ge, Wen SongAbstract
Large language models increasingly automate optimization modeling from natural language problems, producing written mathematics, solver code and a returned report. Verifying one optimization problem across these artifacts requires semantic comparison: unequal models can attain the same objective, equivalent models can use different auxiliary variables, and mutually consistent artifacts can omit the same source requirement. ORSMT provides a typed semantic interface and exact SMT relation queries. It aligns observable decisions, projects auxiliary variables, proves or refutes feasible region and objective relations, localizes refutations to implicated rows or domains and links source texts when available. It then reconstructs one artifact from another, and each adopted candidate passes the required relation checks. Across 3,034 problems and six generator sizes, ORSMT improves the model-code match rate in all 72 benchmark and generator combinations before selection. Protected selection raises the aggregate rate from 43.2% to 88.2% and the share that are both correct and matched from 25.2% to 40.2%. On the 1,905 refuted outputs, certified voting under the shared fallback makes 50.9% of outputs correct and matched, compared with 44.8% for ReLoop and 49.4% for Opt-Verifier. A separate one-round source revision followed by exact reconstruction restores a model-code match for 84.4% of the refuted pairs.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29145
PDF
-
VeeReview: Measuring Build-Verify Pairs in Agent-Authored Pull Requests from a V-Model Perspective
2026-10-21 03:25:44Gabriel Dautovi, Jie JW WuAbstract
Context: Reviewing a pull request requires verification evidence that addresses the proposed change. Coding agent benchmarks and studies of pull request outcomes do not directly assess this relationship. Objective: We test whether the V-Model's build and verify pairs can measure verification evidence in pull requests and support comparisons between agent-authored and human-authored changes. Method: VeeReview classifies four build and verify pairs using repository signals and a language-model judge. Three pairs use model judgements constrained by deterministic signals, and a rule over the diff and repository tree decides Module Design-Unit Test. We evaluated VeeReview against a 25-pull request reference set labelled by two raters and applied it to 1,454 matched pairs of agent and human pull requests from 741 repositories. Results: VeeReview assigned lower build-only rates to agent-authored pull requests on all four pairs, contrary to the preregistered hypothesis (mixed-effects odds ratios 0.52 to 0.86). Architecture-Integration was not significant. Standardization for linked issues, shipped tests and size reduced matched-rate differences by 34% to 60%, and the rule-decided pair's standardized interval included zero. The instrument did not meet its preregistered calibration criterion: agreement with adjudicated labels was 4% to 60% against a required 80%, and inter-rater agreement was weak (kappa = 0.154). Conclusions: The rule-decided pair shows that a process measure judged by a language model partly reflects how a pull request is presented rather than the verification work behind it. We report the cohort differences as observations made with this instrument, and we argue that such measures need a mechanically decided component and a validated human reference before they can support comparisons of verification practice.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29143
PDF
-
Steering Black-Box Large Language Model Agents with Pitfall Anticipation World Model
2026-10-21 03:20:32Jiongxiao Wang, Han Ding, Youzhi Luo, Yawei Wang, Yun Zhou, Linbo Liu, Panpan XuAbstract
Frontier black-box Large Language Model (LLM) agents are proficient at long-horizon reasoning and precise action generation. However, when it comes to a specific agentic task, they have no internalized knowledge of how that particular environment unfolds. A world model offers a natural remedy, providing the agent with environment specific knowledge by foreseeing how the environment will respond to the action it is about to take. Prior world models for LLM agents mainly predict next observations at each step, which is costly and often uninformative because individual observations provide limited task-relevant guidance and not every step requires call for foresight. This raises a key question: what a world model should predict and when should it be invoked for agentic tasks? Our pilot study suggests that world model guidance is most useful when it anticipates pitfalls within a bounded multi-step future. Motivated by this, we introduce Pitfall Anticipation World Model (PAWM), which selectively intervenes when a potential pitfall arises and predicts the impending failure to steer the agent away from it. PAWM is trained in two stages: Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) on synthetic data labeled with agent pitfalls, followed by GRPO co-training with a black-box LLM to further optimize it in the target environment. PAWM improves Claude Sonnet 4.5 performance by 24.3% on ScienceWorld and 7.7% on WebArena-Lite, outperforming a range of baselines. These results demonstrate that PAWM provides an effective form of world model guidance for black-box LLM agents.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29139
PDF
-
GRAFT: Restoring the Missing Sampling Interface in Continuous Diffusion Language Models
2026-10-21 03:15:30Haoning Yang, Lili PanAbstract
Continuous diffusion language models generate a whole sequence in parallel, never drawing a single word at any intermediate step; only the final step turns embeddings into text. Models such as ELF now report autoregressive-level quality at a fraction of the sampling steps of discrete-token diffusion models, and this design principle -- no step-wise discretization -- is what their own ablations credit for the gain. We show that this same principle carries a hidden cost: a collapse of the lexical long tail. Measured against held-out human text, ELF's output matches the human rate on common words almost exactly, yet its rarest words appear at only 0.30x the human rate, a gap that does not close from 105M to 652M parameters and that no sampler setting these models expose can reach. A same-size GPT-2, in contrast, spans zero to above the human rate by its decoding rule alone. We trace the difference to what continuous diffusion models lack: with no step that ever draws a discrete word, every step is instead driven by an average over the candidates still in play, and averaging a rare candidate together with the common word competing for its slot lands on the common word. An autoregressive model avoids this because its decoding rule samples one candidate rather than averaging over all of them. We propose GRAFT, a training-free method that grafts this missing choice back onto a frozen model: while the model is still undecided, GRAFT commits the rare words the average would otherwise discard, then regenerates the sequence from scratch with those commitments held in place. Across three ELF scales and on LangFlow, an independent continuous dLLM, GRAFT restores the rare-word share of generated text from 0.42-0.77x the human rate to 0.82-1.10x, a relative gain of 34-109%, and moves the entire word-frequency profile closer to human on every model tested, by 2.7x on ELF-B and 12x on LangFlow.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29136
PDF
-
Agentic Video Understanding: A Survey
2026-10-21 02:49:27Xinyu Deng, Siwen Luo, Daochang LiuAbstract
As large language models (LLMs) become capable of processing increasingly diverse modalities and longer temporal contexts, an emerging line of work is moving beyond fixed video-language inference toward agentic systems that actively decide what information to inspect, retain, verify, and act upon. This survey reviews video understanding agents: systems that use video as the primary information source and solve understanding tasks through adaptive state construction and action selection. We first formalize an agent loop for video understanding, then address a central question: why do agents matter for video understanding? To answer this, we organize the literature through a challenge-to-design taxonomy, linking context bottlenecks to hierarchical evidence memory, evidence sparsity to active evidence acquisition, temporal causality to state and process tracking, and multimodal ambiguity to role-specialized coordination. We further review state space paradigms, learning paradigms, supervision signals, benchmarks, and evaluation protocols. Finally, we identify open directions toward agentic-native temporal modeling and video-native agents. Project page: this https URL
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.31713
PDF
-
Same Answer, Different Reasons: Trace-Level Divergence in Multilingual Large Language Models
2026-10-21 02:35:06Rui Sun, Peizhao Mei, Xiewei Cheng, Kaizhuo Chen, Taoran Li, Zhiyuan Yu, Varun ChandrasekaranAbstract
Multilingual large language models are increasingly deployed in settings where visible reasoning traces support verification, education, and safety auditing, yet standard evaluations typically measure only final-answer agreement or holistic response similarity. As a result, they establish outcome consistency without determining whether users across languages receive comparable supporting evidence. We introduce a trace-level divergence framework that compares visible reasoning traces as structured sequences, decomposing agreement into structural similarity, order consistency, and holistic similarity, with pair-specific calibration to enable comparison across languages. Across three reasoning benchmarks, seven languages, and six frontier LLMs, the natural baseline---embedding each whole response and comparing the two by cosine---systematically overstates agreement: $52.1\%$--$67.3\%$ of examples in the top quartile of holistic similarity are not in the top quartile of structural similarity. This dissociation is stable across sentence encoders and step segmentations, and blind bilingual annotation studies in two English-anchored language pairs show that human judgments align with structural similarity rather than with the holistic baseline. A same-language control shows that the level of divergence is language-specific: two English traces for paraphrases of the same question agree more closely than an English trace and its counterparts in other languages. Our results show that answer-level and holistic evaluations can substantially overestimate the consistency of multilingual explanatory artifacts, motivating trace-level evaluation for reliable multilingual deployment.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29092
PDF
