Language_Model
-
ALIAS: Evaluating Performance and Memorization in LLM-Written TLA+ Specifications
2026-10-21 14:02:02Arslan Bisharat, Mujtaba Nazari, Khushboo Bhadauria, Brian Ortiz, Eric Spencer, Beatriz Santos, TaiNing Wang, George K. Thiruvathukal, Konstantin Laufer, Mohammed AbuhamadAbstract
Memorization inflates the benchmark scores of large language models (LLMs), since a model can reproduce answers it saw in training. Researchers test for it with consistent identifier renaming (CIR), which gives every identifier in a task a new name, and treat a lower score on the renamed task as evidence of recall. We test this method on the Temporal Logic of Actions Plus (TLA+) language, whose model checker acts as an oracle by confirming whether a renamed task preserves the exact behaviors of the original. Across 111 TLA+-Bench tasks, renaming lowers the correctness of Claude Opus 4.8 from 28% to 18% and of GPT-5 from 9% to 7%. Most of this decrease comes from how the test grades, which requires exact names that most descriptions never state. Grading by behavior shrinks the decrease to about 3 percentage points for Opus 4.8 and to 0 for GPT-5. In two model families fine-tuned on disjoint halves of the tasks, renaming removes about half of the training gain in likelihood and costs 4.9 percentage points (Qwen) and 1.3 percentage points (Gemma) on unseen tasks. A lower score after renaming therefore mixes memorization, name-based grading, and the cost of new names.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29767
PDF
-
OMAR: Open-World Multi-Attribute Reasoning for Scene-Conditioned Shelf Organization
2026-10-21 13:59:13Benedikt Kreis, Rohit Menon, Benno Wingender, Muhammad Ehsan Ullah, Nils Dengler, Maren BennewitzAbstract
With the advent of foundation models, robots are increasingly capable of understanding and executing explicitly specified human tasks. Extending these capabilities to open-ended tasks, however, requires robots to infer appropriate actions from the observed scene. Household organization exemplifies this challenge, as robots must often act without detailed instructions, predefined object vocabularies, or known object-receptacle associations. While robots may follow instructions or learn organization preferences from demonstrations, inferring the latent organization of an occasionally changing scene and placing a novel object consistently with it remains challenging. We propose an open-world multi-attribute reasoning pipeline that grounds unknown objects across views and constructs an instance-level 3D scene graph for placement reasoning. First, a vision-language model proposes labels together with attributes such as content and packaging type, which are grounded through segmentation, depth, and multi-view association. Then, an LLM reasons over this representation to infer the latent shelf organization and rank scene-consistent object placements without explicitly user-provided preferences. The resulting placement rankings guide subsequent geometric and kinematic feasibility checks for execution. Our experimental evaluation shows that our approach leads to improved instance mapping and placement coherence over single-view language-grounding and geometry-only baselines, enabling autonomous placement of previously unseen objects without predefined object-receptacle mappings or class-specific retraining.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29761
PDF
-
Bridging Foundational and Agentic Capabilities of LLMs
2026-10-21 13:50:43Wei Guo, Yuanjian Xu, Jianing Hao, Yongyao Duan, Ran Chen, Zhong Li, Guang ZhangAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as agents, yet it remains unclear how their foundational capabilities translate into agentic capabilities. End-to-end scores leave unresolved whether low benchmark capability or weak deployment drives a failure, limiting actionable diagnosis. We bridge foundational and agentic capabilities through an operation-level measurement framework. We represent each model with a foundational profile derived from capability benchmarks and an operation profile derived from interaction trajectories, and define capability realization gaps as deviations of observed operation performance from predictions based on foundational capabilities. Experiments on fifteen model services in $\tau^2$-Bench show that foundational profiles only partially predict agentic operations. Models with comparable profiles can differ substantially in execution, and these gaps remain consistent across task subsets. Operation profiles add information and substantially improve task-score prediction. The framework locates execution departures at the operation level to inform model development and agent evaluation. We will release our code and analysis artifacts.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29751
PDF
-
Accept or Repair: Preserving Passage-Supported Answers in Contrastive Decoding
2026-10-21 13:32:29Jungseob Lee, Seungyoon Lee, Hyeonseok Moon, Seongtae Hong, Suhyune Son, Sugyeong Eo, Minhyuk Kim, Chanjun Park, Jaehyung SeoAbstract
Large language models often answer from knowledge learned during training, even when a provided passage contradicts that knowledge. To address this problem, contrastive decoding contrasts the predictions under the full and a modified prompt at every token, but it also alters correct answers that the passage supports. We show that checking answers against the passage removes this trade-off. Based on this observation, we propose Accept-or-Repair (AoR), a training-free procedure. AoR keeps a sampled answer if the passage supports it. Otherwise, it tries up to two replacements with contrastive decoding, returning one as soon as it passes this check. It rejects replacements that repeat the answer generated without the passage when the passage favors another answer. Our experiments show that AoR raises the score over sampling by 12.5 points on counterfactual passages and 2.3 on ordinary ones, surpassing eight contrastive and prompting baselines on both, including when each receives the same rejection rule. Replacing only initial answers that the passage does not support improves the average score of every decoder. These results suggest that models can follow passages that contradict their knowledge while preserving accuracy on passages that agree with it. Code will be released at this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29727
PDF
-
Retrieval Augmented Generation Compositionality
2026-10-21 13:30:29Ido Levy, Segev Shlomov, Leshem ChoshenAbstract
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) grounds large language models in external knowledge. Modern pipelines combine embedding, chunking, retrieval, reranking, query augmentation, context compression, and agentic verification, yet these techniques are typically evaluated one at a time. It remains unclear whether their isolated gains survive composition, whether retrieval quality and answer faithfulness favor the same design choices, and whether conclusions from small corpora hold at large scale. We pre-declare three hypotheses and introduce LASAGNA, an open-source framework for controlled RAG evaluation. We test 450 configurations across eight benchmarks and corpora ranging from 5K to 200K documents. Three findings emerge. First, individually strong techniques from different phases of a RAG pipeline do not necessarily compose: three retrieval techniques predict a +47% combined improvement but deliver only +17% when used together. Second, component gains stack differently for retrieval and faithfulness, and optimizing one can hurt the other. Third, the best composition changes as the corpus grows: the combination that wins on a small corpus may not remain best at large scale. These findings show that gains measured in isolation are not reliable predictors of realistic performance, and that new RAG techniques should be tested with the full surrounding stack. We call on researchers to do so and supply LASAGNA to simplify these experiments.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29722
PDF
-
Bio-Inspired Auditory Processing: Coupling Parallel Resonate-and-Fire Dynamics with Ternary Recurrent Networks for Speech Recognition
2026-10-21 13:29:46Pavlos Poulos, Katelyn Sadorf, Themos Stafylakis, Costas A. AnastassiouAbstract
Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) promise energy-efficient inference through sparse, event-driven computation, yet remain constrained on continuous, context-dependent tasks such as automatic speech recognition (ASR). A key bottleneck is the Leaky Integrate-and-Fire (LIF) neuron, whose membrane decay erases information across pauses and phonetic boundaries while it must both extract features and retain long-range context. Inspired by cortical separation of nonlinear filtering and somatic integration, we introduce the Spiking Ternary GRU (stGRU): a ternary-weight gated recurrent unit performs temporal filtering, while downstream Resonate-and-Fire (RF) neurons generate the binary spike stream driving the next block's event pathway. This makes binary event transmission a native training constraint rather than a separate deployment-time activation quantization step; together with ternary weights, learned projections avoid dense floating-point matrix MACs. Trained end-to-end on LibriSpeech-960, Small, Medium, and Large stGRUs reach 8.09%, 7.04%, and $6.44 \pm 0.17\%$ WER on test-clean without an external language model. To our knowledge, these are the first matrix-MAC-free spiking networks without a learned ANN sequence decoder to achieve single-digit WER on LibriSpeech. The architecture also achieves 10.88% test CER on Aishell-1 (9.28% on dev) when trained from scratch. Internally, trained networks develop a depth-graded hierarchy: shallow layers act as fast acoustic filters, while deep layers form slower semantic integrators whose latent representations segregate into part-of-speech manifolds and word-level spike events. Deep-layer firing rates follow lognormal distributions with a sparsity gradient, mirroring hierarchical processing observed in human cortex in vivo. Our biologically grounded architecture combines competitive ASR with favorable modeled compute and memory cost.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29720
PDF
-
Reconstruction-Augmented Visuomotor Pre-Training of 3D-Grounded Bimanual Dexterity from RGB-Only Human Videos
2026-10-21 13:28:19Xingyi He, Zhiwen Qiu, Adhitya Polavaram, Yunhao Cao, Cory Fan, Julius Samwer, Saleh Kalantari, Kuan FangAbstract
We present SpatialDex, a framework that learns 3D-grounded bimanual dexterity from RGB-only human videos through reconstruction-augmented visuomotor pre-training. The central idea is to learn human behavior together with its spatial context. From each video, we reconstruct the scene geometry and estimate the hand motion, align them at a shared video-level scale using the hand-size prior of 3D hand estimates. We retain the reconstructed geometry as both a policy input and a prediction target. The policy grounds the token grid of a pre-trained vision-language model in this geometry through gated residual fusion, is trained to predict future scene geometry alongside wrist and finger actions, and generates finger motion conditioned on the predicted trajectories of both wrists. Pre-trained on 1M human-video clips and fine-tuned with a small number of robot demonstrations, SpatialDex outperforms the state-of-the-art methods by 16.5 points on nine simulated dexterous tasks across two embodiments and by 38.3 points on six real-world bimanual dexterous tasks. Under a matched comparison, pre-training with reconstructed geometry improves success by 14.2 points over pre-training on hand motion alone.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29716
PDF
-
CausGround: Causal Interaction Grounding for Adaptive Embodied Planning
2026-10-21 13:16:19Yijun Shen, Diqi He, Jinbang Guo, Wanyue Zhang, Jiaming Mi, Huan Yang, Zhongyuan Wang, Zhiwei Yu, Kai ZhangAbstract
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) show promising reasoning capabilities, but reliable physical interaction requires planning that accounts for when actions are executable and how they change the world. These preconditions and effects are environment-dependent and often not captured by MLLMs, making adaptation challenging. Yet existing approaches either require costly environment-specific training or rely on unstructured interaction experience that is difficult to reuse. Therefore, we introduce CausGround, a non-parametric causal interaction grounding framework that distills interaction experience into reusable action-centered causal knowledge. CausGround identifies action preconditions and effects and organizes them in a factorized world-state representation capturing object attributes and inter-object relations. At planning time, task-relevant causal dependencies are grounded in current observations to support backward reasoning over preconditions and forward reasoning over effects for action selection and multi-step planning. We evaluate CausGround on simulated high-level planning, interaction reasoning, and real-world robot manipulation. On adapted VirtualHome and RoboCasa benchmarks, CausGround improves vision-based high-level planning across MLLM backbones, increasing average task success from 24.9% to 53.3% on VirtualHome and closed-loop planning success from 43.0% to 57.0% on RoboCasa. On SWITCH, average interaction reasoning accuracy increases from 25.8% to 31.9%, indicating improved action selection, recovery, and verification. Moreover, real-world experiments show that CausGround reasons backward from MLLM-interpreted goals to derive executable high-level action sequences for sequential manipulation. These results demonstrate that reusable action preconditions and effects support long-horizon embodied planning across diverse environments without parameter updates.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29702
PDF
-
Scaling Multilingual Pretraining of Pixel Language Models
2026-10-21 12:57:41Ilker Kesen, Jenny Kunz, Kasra Malihi, Desmond ElliottAbstract
Pixel language models process text as rendered images instead of a finite vocabulary, which gives them strong cross-lingual transfer abilities. However, not much is known about how these abilities are influenced by larger-scale pretraining. In this paper, we train a family of MPIXEL models along three axes of variation: more languages, more scripts, and larger model capacity under fixed per-language compute. In evaluations on five tasks covering 83 languages, we find that scaling acts locally: each axis improves the added languages and scripts, while increased capacity mitigates the curse of multilinguality from pretraining on more languages. Transfer to unseen scripts improves with multilingual pretraining, but does not further improve with scaling. On typologically distant low-resource languages, our models outperform subword and character-level baselines across many writing systems. We also show that larger pixel models reserve more layers for visual processing, and that cross-lingual alignment weakens as more languages are added. Overall, our findings characterize how multilingual scaling improves pixel language models.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29681
PDF
-
Effects of Model Scale and Quantization on Social Bias and Abstention in Question Answering
2026-10-21 12:38:04Kuniko Paxton, Ifeoluwa Wuraola, Dhavalkumar ThakkerAbstract
The deployment of small and quantized language models in resource-constrained settings raises an important fairness question: when a compressed model produces fewer biased responses, does this reflect fairer behavior or greater abstention? We study this problem in Question Answering (QA) using the BBQ benchmark across multiple model sizes and quantization settings from Qwen3, Gemma-3, and SmolLM2. We also examine whether the observed trends remain stable across alternative prompt formulations and when the ``Unknown'' option is removed in a forced-choice setting. Our results show that larger models achieved higher QA accuracy, but bias showed no simple scaling trend and quantization effects varied across configurations. Notably, 20 of the 26 configurations with fewer biased responses also show increased over-abstention, indicating that lower observed bias can partly reflect greater abstention. These findings show that lower observed bias can partly reflect greater abstention, and that fairness evaluation should consider biased responses, abstention, prompt formulation, and answer-option design jointly.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29657
PDF
-
LLMs as survey respondents: Comparison to simple semantic baselines
2026-10-21 12:26:20Esko Lehtonen, Tommi Buder-Gr\"ondahlAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) have been explored as surrogates for human survey respondents. A more promising application is data augmentation, where LLMs predict new responses from partial human data. However, the semantic similarity between questionnaire items is a known source of correlation between answers. It is thus unclear whether LLMs actually infer meaningful relationships between question-response pairs, or use surface-level comparison between questions as a heuristic. To assess this, we evaluated how three LLMs can predict responses to held-out items in two surveys measuring attitudes toward automated or light-electric vehicles, based on varying proportions of known responses. Performance was compared to two baselines, where new responses were derived by maximizing embedding-similarity to a prior response. While LLMs mostly predicted human responses better than baselines, their performance consistently declined with a lower share of known responses, even aligning with the baseline in one survey. Our results show that LLMs' capacities for augmenting replies varied across surveys, and can revert to the same levels as simpler embedding similarity baselines when less data is available.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29645
PDF
-
Overview of CHIP 2026 Shared Task 1: Patient-Specific Phenotype Concept Recognition in Full-Text Biomedical Literature
2026-10-21 11:45:35Xuanlyu Zhu, Feng Tian, Yang Zhong, Pengqi Zheng, Xiwen Bi, Ling Luo, Yuanyuan Sun, Jian Wang, Lingfei LinAbstract
Automatic phenotype information extraction plays an important role in rare disease diagnosis, genotype-phenotype analysis, and precision medicine. However, accurately identifying phenotype concepts and determining their associations with specific patients remain challenging, particularly in full-text biomedical articles involving multiple patients and complex clinical descriptions. This paper presents an overview of CHIP 2026 Shared Task 1, which aims to promote the development of methods for patient-specific phenotype concept recognition from full-text biomedical literature. The task consists of two subtasks: full-text phenotype concept recognition and patient-specific phenotype association. For this evaluation, we used 200 annotated full-text biomedical articles from the PatientPheX dataset, containing 506 patients, 15,193 phenotype mentions, and 5,656 patient-phenotype associations. A total of 455 teams registered for the competition, with 189 and 103 valid submissions received on the Phase A and Phase B leaderboards, respectively. The best-performing system achieved an overall score of 0.7389 on the final test set, outperforming the baseline by 8.37 percentage points. The top-performing teams explored diverse approaches combining biomedical language models, large language models (LLMs), and ensemble strategies. The evaluation results highlight both the potential of these approaches and the remaining challenges in patient attribution and phenotype normalization from full-text biomedical literature. The post-evaluation phase remains open at this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29606
PDF
-
A Diagnostic Study of Faithfulness in Diffusion Language Models for Table-to-Text Generation
2026-10-21 11:42:19Zaynab Merimi, Noussayba El Marrakchi, Arthur SatoufAbstract
Diffusion language models generate by iteratively denoising a masked sequence under bidirectional attention, without the strict left-to-right commitment of autoregressive decoding. Whether this difference affects how reliably they remain grounded in structured inputs is largely unexplored. We study this question in table-to-text generation using ToTTo, where highlighted source cells make factual grounding directly testable. We compare the masked diffusion models MDLM and LLaDA with GPT-2 and GPT-Neo under an identical retrieval-based few-shot protocol, together with a QLoRA-adapted LLaDA, and we score reference similarity and source grounding as separate axes. The two pull apart. Within LLaDA, additional demonstrations raise BLEU from 11.3 to 22.0 while NLI entailment against the source table falls from 0.78 to 0.52; QLoRA reaches the best BLEU of the study, 24.15, and grounds no better for it. Manual annotation shows the failure modes differ in kind: the autoregressive baselines tend to wander off the table, while LLaDA-based models more often stay on topic and swap out individual entities. Reference-based metrics alone are insufficient to assess faithfulness in table-to-text generation.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29602
PDF
-
XGLASS: X-Ray, Gaze and Language Assisted Slice Sequencing for CT Volumes
2026-10-21 11:27:48Michael Gl\"ockler, Timo RopinskiAbstract
Vision-language models (VLMs) achieve remarkable performance on 2D medical images, such as X-rays or pathology images, while 3D VLMs that directly process CT/MRI volumes lag behind due to limited 3D training data and the predominance of 2D foundation architectures. To leverage powerful 2D VLMs for analyzing medical volumes, which contain hundreds of slices, it is therefore necessary to focus only on those few slices, which are diagnostically relevant. To enable such a prioritization, we propose XGLASS, a method that transfers medical expertise from 2D X-rays to 3D CT for task-aware slice prioritization. XGLASS uses disease-conditioned importance maps derived from language-aligned radiologist gaze on X-rays and spatially aligns them with coronal CT projections, bringing gaze priors and CT content into a shared 2D representation. The fused gaze-prior/CT projection is then used to predict a disease-specific ordering of axial slices, prioritizing diagnostically relevant slices. XGLASS significantly improves budgeted retrieval over 2D and 3D-native baselines, achieving a top-10 hit rate up to 75.9% for the best-performing disease. In practice, this means that after inspecting only the top 10 slices (4.17% of a 240-slice scan), XGLASS identifies a diagnostically relevant slice in more than 75% of cases. For downstream slice-wise finding classification, an XGLASS-selected 30-slice candidate set reduces model calls by 87.5% while improving F1 by 11.3 percentage points over all-slice inference, 4.2 points over the strongest 2D selector, and remains competitive with 3D-native selectors while requiring up to 130.8 times less time and 10.9 times less GPU memory per finding, supporting its use as a lightweight preselector for volumetric CT analysis. The code and pretrained checkpoint are available on this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26255
PDF
-
WRDO: Weighted Refusal Direction Optimization in Aligned Language Models
2026-10-21 10:42:25Grigoriy Evseev, Vladimir Solodkin, Dmitry Bylinkin, Daniil Medyakov, Vladimir Aletov, Aleksandr BeznosikovAbstract
Aligned large language models are trained to comply with benign requests while refusing harmful ones. However, recent work shows that this refusal behavior is fragile and can often be disrupted by simple activation- or weight-space interventions. In particular, refusal has been shown to be largely mediated by a single residual-stream direction, typically computed as a difference-of-means vector between harmful and harmless prompts. However, this standard construction aggregates heterogeneous harmful prompts into one uniform average, potentially conflating distinct refusal-related phenomena. In this work, we study whether refusal interventions can be strengthened by learning how to combine prompt-specific refusal directions. We propose Weighted Refusal Direction Optimization (WRDO), a procedure that constructs a composite refusal direction from a bank of per-prompt directions using learned aggregation weights. This approach allows different harmful prompts to contribute unequally to the final intervention direction. We evaluate WRDO against prior single-direction methods on three open-weight language models using three guard judges and HarmBench as an external evaluator. We further measure the effect of the intervention on general model capability through standard utility benchmarks. Finally, we investigate a defense-oriented setting in which the same optimization machinery is used in reverse to restore refusal behavior in an abliterated model checkpoint. Our results show that weighted aggregation provides a more effective and flexible mechanism for manipulating refusal representations.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29555
PDF
-
Generalized CycleGRPO for Fine-Grained Multimodal Understanding and Grounding
2026-10-21 10:39:56Xin Zhang, Haochen Wang, Beibei Lin, Zhaoxiang Zhang, Robby T. Tan, Jason Li, Dacheng TaoAbstract
Fine-grained multimodal intelligence requires models to both understand a designated region and localize it from language. Existing methods learn these directions with separate objectives and task-specific annotations. We present Generalized CycleGRPO, the first unified reinforcement learning framework coupling region understanding and localization across spatial, temporal, and spatio-temporal domains. Given a region, a multimodal large language model generates candidate descriptions and then localizes each description to reconstruct the input region. Reconstruction overlap provides a verifiable reward for captioning, while individual localization rewards improve the inverse mapping. A common region-space formulation extends this cycle from image masks and boxes to video intervals and timestamped spatial evidence, without reference captions or an external language-model judge during reinforcement learning. In videos, the cycle encourages descriptions that distinguish a target event from similar recurrences. We introduce DOVE (Distinctive Occurrence-level Video-caption Evaluation), a human-verified contrastive benchmark for this temporal distinctiveness. CycleGRPO improves SAMTok's overall gIoU from 57.5% to 68.2% on GroundingSuite and average gIoU from 71.2% to 78.7% on GRES. For temporal tasks, it achieves 51.9% tIoU on Charades and 33.3% Temporal Evidence Coverage on DOVE, compared with 45.6% and 14.8% for the Qwen3-VL initialization. These results establish region-text cycle consistency as a general self-evaluation principle for multimodal understanding and localization. Models, code, and DOVE are available at this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29552
PDF
-
PACE: Periodic and Channel-Aligned Encoding of Four-Bit Recurrent States
2026-10-21 10:31:52Patrick Haller, Filipe Laitenberger, Alan AkbikAbstract
Linear-attention language models keep their context in a recurrent state of fixed size, where an inference system stores one copy of this state for every sequence it decodes at the same time. Storing the state at lower precision therefore lets more sequences share an accelerator. Existing state quantizers round the state after every generated token and report that four bits lose accuracy unless the bit width is raised or the model is fine-tuned.\par We introduce PACE, a post-hoc four-bit state quantizer. PACE rounds the state only once every few generated tokens, as chunked kernels already do once per chunk during prefill, and keeps the tokens generated in between in a small buffer. Rounding less often reduces the error that accumulates in the state. Additionally, we find that the large entries of the gated-delta state gather in columns, because some channels of the update written at each token remain large across many tokens. PACE therefore shares each quantization scale within one column. It also keeps the heads that retain rounding error longest at eight bits. On four hybrid models from 4B to 35B parameters, PACE with mixed four- and eight-bit heads is competitive with eight-bit DAMP on the three larger models at about two thirds of its memory, PACE with four-bit heads throughout scores higher than Q-Mamba at equal memory, and rounding every few tokens preserves the decoding speedup of the buffer.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29545
PDF
-
Melange: A Synthetic Visual Bias Benchmark for Multi-modal Large Language Models
2026-10-21 10:25:06Razieh Rezaei, Ehsaneddin Asgary, Masoud Jalili SabetAbstract
Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have seen broad adoption, but their biases are still far less examined than those of standard LLMs, creating possible social harms when deployed in real-world settings. Prior efforts to extend bias analyses from LLMs into the multi-modal space either cover only a few bias categories or do not ensure that the groups being compared are clearly addressed by visual cues in the images. To overcome these limitations, we introduce Melange, a wide-ranging synthetic visual benchmark covering seven categories for assessing social biases in MLLMs. It is grounded in the widely used language-only BBQ dataset (Bias Benchmark for Question Answering) from BigBench, carefully extending its constructed contexts via controlled generation of visual scenarios so the target attributes appear visually and clearly. To maximize reliability, our generated images pass through two stages of validation: automated screening using visual question answering (VQA) and subsequent manual inspection by human annotators. By systematically evaluating 23 open-source MLLMs across three matched evaluation settings---text-only, image-only, and image-with-context---Melange isolates the fairness effect of the input modality. Switching from text to vision reduces fairness by 0.291 on average, a gap that varies by model family rather than by scale alone. A perception control confirms that this gap is not an artifact of visual comprehension: models identify the depicted attributes at 90--95\% accuracy yet still fail to abstain. When models do commit to a biased answer, polarity-aware stereotype alignment shows they choose the human-stereotypical response roughly three-quarters of the time.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29537
PDF
-
RCSD: Reinforcement and Continual Learning for Domain-Specific Speculative Decoding
2026-10-21 10:16:23Mingkang Liu, Weiming Meng, Peipei Jiao, Jiawei Zhang, Tianyuan Liu, Junyan Li, Lichen PangAbstract
Speculative decoding accelerates large language model inference by employing a compact draft model to propose candidate tokens that are verified in parallel by a target model. Conventional training relies on soft-label distillation, which forces the draft model to mimic the target's full output distribution, including high-entropy regions that degrade acceptance rates and increase early rejection risk. We propose RCSD (Reinforcement and Continual Learning for Speculative Decoding), a training framework that aligns draft model optimization with the system-level objective of maximizing acceptance length. RCSD leverages naturally occurring accepted and rejected sequences during speculative inference to construct implicit preference pairs, with masked loss to avoid penalizing target-aligned tokens. Evaluated across multiple benchmarks, RCSD improves average acceptance length by 35% over HASS and achieves 1.35x faster end-to-end inference than HASS on practical workloads, without compromising generation quality.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29527
PDF
-
Beyond the Vote: When Do LLMs Add Value to Retrieval-Based Tabular Classification?
2026-10-21 10:06:29Ziquan Wang, Yuxuan Nie, Jian Ma, Yingjie LiAbstract
Retrieval-based in-context learning (ICL) enables large language models (LLMs) to predict tabular labels from similar examples, but it remains unclear whether LLM inference improves on direct voting over those same examples. We address this question by comparing four general-purpose LLMs with distance-weighted nearest-neighbor voting (Distance-KNN) using identical retrieved neighbors across 19 tabular classification datasets. With the number of demonstrations fixed, enlarging the retrieval candidate pool improves accuracy for all predictors, yet Distance-KNN achieves the highest mean accuracy at every pool size. More detailed analyses reveal that LLM gains are concentrated where retrieved neighbors exhibit low label consensus and vary across models. These gains further depend on the average feature-space distance to the test query: under low label consensus, some LLMs outperform Distance-KNN in close and intermediate neighborhoods, but all fall behind on average in the most distant group. Complementary experiments on the number of demonstrations, prompt formulation, retrieval representation, and label-balanced demonstration selection largely preserve the overall findings. These results characterize when LLM inference adds predictive value beyond distance-weighted voting in retrieval-based tabular ICL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29520
PDF
