Abstract
Quantum machine learning has emerged as a promising application domain for near-term quantum hardware, particularly through hybrid quantum-classical models that leverage both classical and quantum processing. Although numerous hybrid architectures have been proposed and demonstrated successfully on benchmark tasks, a significant open question remains regarding the specific contribution of quantum components to the overall performance of these models. In this work, we aim to shed light on the impact of quantum processing within hybrid quantum-classical neural network architectures through a rigorous statistical study under ideal, noise-free simulation. We systematically assess a selection of commonly used HQNN architectures on three binary medical classification tasks covering medical signal data as well as planar and volumetric images. In doing so, we examine the influence attributable to classical and quantum aspects such as encoding schemes, entanglement, and circuit size. Within this experimental setting, we find that in best-case scenarios, hybrid models show performance comparable to their classical counterparts. However, in most cases, performance metrics deteriorate when the investigated QNN components replace matched classical processing layers. Our multi-modal analysis provides empirical insights into the contributions of the tested quantum components and advocates for cautious claims and design choices for hybrid models in near-term applications.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.04732
