Abstract
Existing benchmarks for text-vision embedding models report aggregate scores that obscure whether performance comes from general capabilities, task-specific adaptation, or robustness to challenging tasks. We introduce TRACE, a Training-aware Robustness and Challenge Evaluation framework that reorganizes 168 tasks from various sources of datasets into three categories: General, Adaptability, and Challenge. Through controlled experiments on two text-vision embedding models, we show that combining general and adaptation data improves Adaptability performance by 7.67 and 7.09 points, respectively, while largely preserving General performance. However, Challenge performance remains below 5.0, with limited improvements from additional training data. Further analysis identifies multilingual and visual-document tasks as major weaknesses. Our findings demonstrate that data adaptation alone is insufficient to address these challenges, highlighting the need for methodological advances beyond data-centric improvements.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26993
