Abstract
Tool-using LLM agents increasingly answer e-commerce queries through multi-step tool interactions. The expected output of a tool call can shift between agent development and execution, allowing a plausible but incorrect value to be returned without an explicit failure signal. These silent errors may propagate through subsequent decisions into final answers. To study agents' resilience across this end-to-end process, we formulate Silent-error Resilience Task, an interactive task that evaluates whether they complete the original query after a silent error corrupts an intermediate state. We introduce RITE, a benchmark built from human-authored industrial workflows and production-log-derived inputs. To enable controlled and reproducible evaluation, we use a semantic error taxonomy to inject errors into fixed workflow prefixes, freeze recorded tool behavior, and let agents continue freely. It contains 167 matched units across nine e-commerce workflows, yielding 501 silent-error, correct-value, and explicit-failure instances. Across 10 recent LLMs, silent errors roughly halve task success and are consistently harder than explicit failures. Recognition, use of an available verification path, and integration of the resulting evidence form successive bottlenecks. We also propose a light State Checker as an intervention to test whether resilience can be improved.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27777
