Abstract
Long-horizon agents learn from failure, but the value of a failure record can change as execution progresses. We study when retaining, compressing, or removing the same history block improves subsequent execution relative to full-history KEEP. We introduce RECAP, a framework that combines matched context interventions, execution-relational prediction, and independent policy certification. Matched environment states and rollout seeds measure success and continuation prompt-cost differences; prefix-only relations between a failure block and the current execution propose promising edits. Independent task bundles then select a policy subject to harmful-intervention and non-positive-benefit risk constraints under a fixed measurement protocol. A five-seed longitudinal case holds both the failure block and its summary fixed: compression fails at an early state and becomes a cost-saving intervention at a later state. Across five backbones, RECAP produces positive paired-success saving estimates with backbone-specific reliability-efficiency tradeoffs. On Hunyuan-A13B, it edits 43.24% of retained checkpoints while matching KEEP's observed 91.89% continuation success and reducing unconditional mean continuation prompt cost by 4,619.8 tokens (2.13%). The framework provides an execution-level reference for deciding when to forget: retain history by its value to what comes next.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.22897
