Abstract
Speaker de-identification (SDID) aims to preserve privacy by concealing speaker identity while maintaining speech utility. However, current evaluations often reduce privacy to a single dimension - biometric verification performance - typically measured by Equal Error Rate (EER). This narrow focus ignores critical leakage channels, such as soft biometric inference, embedding-level re-identification, and structural template similarity, which threaten the unlinkability and irreversibility of biometric references. We propose a holistic evaluation framework across five complementary metrics: (i) EER, (ii) soft biometric leakage score , (iii) cumulative match characteristic re-identification analysis, (iv) canonical correlation analysis and Procrustes embedding alignment, and (v) intelligibility via word error rate and semantic similarity. Evaluating five SDID systems from the IARPA ARTS program, we demonstrate that these metrics capture independent dimensions of information leakage. Our results indicate that reliance on a single metric can misrepresent the privacy properties of an SDID system.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.18673
