Abstract
Encoder-based code representation models remain widely deployed for discriminative tasks such as clone detection and code classification, where their small size and low inference cost are decisive. Their robustness, however, is fragile: under invariant programs, semantically equivalent code written in different syntactic forms, learned representations degrade substantially even though program behavior is unchanged. We present an empirical study of this robustness gap across four encoder baselines, two downstream tasks, and four datasets, together with a minimal code-only continued pretraining recipe that closes much of it. Our method, invariant pretraining (InvPT), applies semantic-preserving transformations to the corpus and combines masked language modeling with multi-positive supervised contrastive learning that treats all augmentations of the same source function as positives, mixing self-contrast pairs (same code, different masks) with invariant-contrast pairs (transformed code) for positives of varying difficulty. Unlike prior contrastive code encoders, InvPT does not require paired natural-language data. Across our evaluation, InvPT improves robustness on transformed test sets by up to 11 percentage points on clone detection and 19 on code classification while matching or improving standard accuracy, and our ablations isolate multi-positive invariant contrast as the main source of the gains. Our aim is not a new objective but a careful measurement of where encoder robustness breaks and how far a simple, code-only recipe can recover it.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15412
