Paper Reading AI Learner

Self-Supervised Pretraining Improves Cross-Site and Cross-Scale Robustness of Point Cloud Leaf-Wood Segmentation

2026-07-08 03:17:06
Heeju Mun, Tackang Yang, Yunsoo Nam, Changhyun Choi

Abstract

The accuracy of existing leaf-wood segmentation methods for tree point clouds varies across forest types and sites. Self-supervised learning (SSL) on point clouds has improved the generalization of deep learning models for forestry point cloud tasks, including biomass regression and individual tree segmentation, but its applicability to leaf-wood segmentation remains untested. In this study, we pretrained Point-M2AE, a widely used SSL architecture for point clouds, on ShapeNet-55 augmented with 2,400 individual tree point clouds. For fine-tuning and inference, we used recursive voxel subdivision to handle the wide variation in point density across inputs, allowing the same model to operate at both individual-tree and plot scales without architecture change. Compared to the model without pretraining, the pretrained model improved wood IoU from 60.5% to 70.0% for needleleaf and from 69.7% to 76.3% for broadleaf trees. On a benchmark spanning four countries across three climatic zones, the pretrained model achieved the smallest cross-site variation and highest overall performance among compared methods (LeWos, CWLS, and PointTransformer). Plot-level segmentation maintained accuracy comparable to individual-tree performance, with mIoU of 84.7% for broadleaf and 77.7% for needleleaf plots, showing that the model generalizes across scales without additional finetuning. As a downstream test in tropical forests, where dense canopies make segmentation challenging, we applied our model and a quantitative structure model to estimate wood volume for 28 trees from Guyana, Indonesia, and Peru to assess whether the segmentation improvements from SSL pretraining translate into improved downstream performance. The resulting volume estimates achieved the lowest error among all methods tested (MAE = 2.40 m$^3$), less than half that of algorithmic baselines (LeWos: 5.94 m$^3$; CWLS: 5.27 m$^3$).

Abstract (translated)

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.06948

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.06948.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Time_Series Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot