Paper Reading AI Learner

Robust Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Small UAS Separation Assurance under GPS Degradation and Spoofing

2026-03-30 18:26:59
Alex Zongo, Filippos Fotiadis, Ufuk Topcu, Peng Wei

Abstract

We address robust separation assurance for small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) under GPS degradation and spoofing via Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL). In cooperative surveillance, each aircraft (or agent) broadcasts its GPS-derived position; when such position broadcasts are corrupted, the entire observed air traffic state becomes unreliable. We cast this state observation corruption as a zero-sum game between the agents and an adversary: with probability R, the adversary perturbs the observed state to maximally degrade each agent's safety performance. We derive a closed-form expression for this adversarial perturbation, bypassing adversarial training entirely and enabling linear-time evaluation in the state dimension. We show that this expression approximates the true worst-case adversarial perturbation with second-order accuracy. We further bound the safety performance gap between clean and corrupted observations, showing that it degrades at most linearly with the corruption probability under Kullback-Leibler regularization. Finally, we integrate the closed-form adversarial policy into a MARL policy gradient algorithm to obtain a robust counter-policy for the agents. In a high-density sUAS simulation, we observe near-zero collision rates under corruption levels up to 35%, outperforming a baseline policy trained without adversarial perturbations.

Abstract (translated)

本文通过多智能体强化学习(MARL)解决了小型无人机系统(sUAS)在GPS降级与欺骗条件下的鲁棒性防撞保障问题。在协同监视场景中,每架无人机(或智能体)广播其GPS定位信息;当此类位置广播受到污染时,整个观测到的空中交通状态将变得不可靠。我们将这种状态观测污染建模为智能体与攻击者之间的零和博弈:以概率R,攻击者会扰动观测状态以最大程度降低各智能体的安全性能。我们推导出该对抗性扰动的闭式表达,完全规避对抗训练,并实现状态维度上的线性时间复杂度评估。证明该表达式能以二阶精度逼近真实最坏情况对抗扰动。进一步,我们量化了清洁观测与污染观测之间的安全性能差距,证明在库尔贝克-莱布勒正则化下,该差距最多随污染概率线性退化。最终,我们将闭式对抗策略集成至MARL策略梯度算法,为智能体生成鲁棒对抗策略。在高密度小型无人机系统仿真中,即使在35%污染水平下,该方法仍实现近零碰撞率,优于未进行对抗训练的基准策略。

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.28900

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.28900.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Time_Series Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot