Paper Reading AI Learner

SCENEBench: An Audio Understanding Benchmark Grounded in Assistive and Industrial Use Cases

2026-03-10 16:15:12
Laya Iyer, Angelina Wang, Sanmi Koyejo

Abstract

Advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled significant capabilities in audio processing, resulting in state-of-the-art models now known as Large Audio Language Models (LALMs). However, minimal work has been done to measure audio understanding beyond automatic speech recognition (ASR). This paper closes that gap by proposing a benchmark suite, SCENEBench (Spatial, Cross-lingual, Environmental, Non-speech Evaluation), that targets a broad form of audio comprehension across four real-world categories: background sound understanding, noise localization, cross-linguistic speech understanding, and vocal characterizer recognition. These four categories are selected based on understudied needs from accessibility technology and industrial noise monitoring. In addition to performance, we also measure model latency. The purpose of this benchmark suite is to assess audio beyond just what words are said - rather, how they are said and the non-speech components of the audio. Because our audio samples are synthetically constructed (e.g., by overlaying two natural audio samples), we further validate our benchmark against 20 natural audio items per task, sub-sampled from existing datasets to match our task criteria, to assess ecological validity. We assess five state-of-the-art LALMs and find critical gaps: performance varies across tasks, with some tasks performing below random chance and others achieving high accuracy. These results provide direction for targeted improvements in model capabilities.

Abstract (translated)

大型语言模型(LLM)的进步使音频处理能力得到了显著提升,进而产生了被称为大音频语言模型(LALM)的先进模型。然而,在自动语音识别(ASR)之外对音频理解进行度量的工作仍然很少。本文通过提出一个基准测试套件SCENEBench来填补这一空白,该套件涵盖了四大类现实世界中的音频理解:背景声音理解、噪音定位、跨语言口语理解和声源特征识别。这四个类别是基于无障碍技术和工业噪声监测领域中研究不足的需求而选定的。 除了性能之外,我们还对模型延迟进行了测量。此基准测试套件旨在评估不仅仅是说出了什么词,更重要的是如何说出这些话以及音频中的非言语部分。由于我们的音频样本是由合成方法构建的(例如,在自然音频样本上叠加),为了验证生态有效性,我们在每个任务中选取了20个从现有数据集中随机抽样的自然音频样本来与合成测试进行对比。 我们评估了五个最先进的LALM,并发现了重要的差距:在各个任务中的性能表现不一,有些任务的表现甚至低于随机猜测的水平,而其他任务则能达到较高的准确性。这些结果为模型能力的具体改进指明了方向。

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.09853

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.09853.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Time_Series Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot