Paper Reading AI Learner

Self-Explaining Hate Speech Detection with Moral Rationales

2026-01-07 00:17:16
Francielle Vargas, Jackson Trager, Diego Alves, Surendrabikram Thapa, Matteo Guida, Berk Atil, Daryna Dementieva, Andrew Smart, Ameeta Agrawal

Abstract

Hate speech detection models rely on surface-level lexical features, increasing vulnerability to spurious correlations and limiting robustness, cultural contextualization, and interpretability. We propose Supervised Moral Rationale Attention (SMRA), the first self-explaining hate speech detection framework to incorporate moral rationales as direct supervision for attention alignment. Based on Moral Foundations Theory, SMRA aligns token-level attention with expert-annotated moral rationales, guiding models to attend to morally salient spans rather than spurious lexical patterns. Unlike prior rationale-supervised or post-hoc approaches, SMRA integrates moral rationale supervision directly into the training objective, producing inherently interpretable and contextualized explanations. To support our framework, we also introduce HateBRMoralXplain, a Brazilian Portuguese benchmark dataset annotated with hate labels, moral categories, token-level moral rationales, and socio-political metadata. Across binary hate speech detection and multi-label moral sentiment classification, SMRA consistently improves performance (e.g., +0.9 and +1.5 F1, respectively) while substantially enhancing explanation faithfulness, increasing IoU F1 (+7.4 pp) and Token F1 (+5.0 pp). Although explanations become more concise, sufficiency improves (+2.3 pp) and fairness remains stable, indicating more faithful rationales without performance or bias trade-offs

Abstract (translated)

仇恨言论检测模型依赖于表面级词汇特征,这增加了对虚假相关性的脆弱性,并限制了其鲁棒性、文化语境化和可解释性。我们提出了监督道德理由注意(SMRA),这是一种首个自我解释的仇恨言论检测框架,该框架将道德理由作为注意力对齐的直接监督。基于道德基础理论,SMRA使词级注意力与专家标注的道德理由对齐,引导模型关注道德上重要的短语而非虚假词汇模式。不同于之前的依据理由监管或事后方法,SMRA直接在训练目标中集成了道德理由监督,从而生成固有的可解释和文化背景化的解释。 为了支持我们的框架,我们还引入了HateBRMoralXplain,这是一个巴西葡萄牙语基准数据集,该数据集根据仇恨标签、道德类别、词级道德理由及社会政治元数据进行了标注。在二元仇恨言论检测和多标签道德情绪分类任务中,SMRA显著提高了性能(例如,分别增加了0.9 F1和1.5 F1),同时大幅增强了解释的一致性,IoU F1提高7.4个百分点,Token F1提高5.0个百分点。虽然解释变得更加简洁,但充足度有所增加(+2.3 pp),公平性保持稳定,这表明更忠实的理由并未影响性能或偏见权衡。

URL

https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.03481

PDF

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.03481.pdf


Tags
3D Action Action_Localization Action_Recognition Activity Adversarial Agent Attention Autonomous Bert Boundary_Detection Caption Chat Classification CNN Compressive_Sensing Contour Contrastive_Learning Deep_Learning Denoising Detection Dialog Diffusion Drone Dynamic_Memory_Network Edge_Detection Embedding Embodied Emotion Enhancement Face Face_Detection Face_Recognition Facial_Landmark Few-Shot Gait_Recognition GAN Gaze_Estimation Gesture Gradient_Descent Handwriting Human_Parsing Image_Caption Image_Classification Image_Compression Image_Enhancement Image_Generation Image_Matting Image_Retrieval Inference Inpainting Intelligent_Chip Knowledge Knowledge_Graph Language_Model LLM Matching Medical Memory_Networks Multi_Modal Multi_Task NAS NMT Object_Detection Object_Tracking OCR Ontology Optical_Character Optical_Flow Optimization Person_Re-identification Point_Cloud Portrait_Generation Pose Pose_Estimation Prediction QA Quantitative Quantitative_Finance Quantization Re-identification Recognition Recommendation Reconstruction Regularization Reinforcement_Learning Relation Relation_Extraction Represenation Represenation_Learning Restoration Review RNN Robot Salient Scene_Classification Scene_Generation Scene_Parsing Scene_Text Segmentation Self-Supervised Semantic_Instance_Segmentation Semantic_Segmentation Semi_Global Semi_Supervised Sence_graph Sentiment Sentiment_Classification Sketch SLAM Sparse Speech Speech_Recognition Style_Transfer Summarization Super_Resolution Surveillance Survey Text_Classification Text_Generation Time_Series Tracking Transfer_Learning Transformer Unsupervised Video_Caption Video_Classification Video_Indexing Video_Prediction Video_Retrieval Visual_Relation VQA Weakly_Supervised Zero-Shot