arXiv_CL
-
Dynamic System Inspired Continuous Large Language Model for AI4Science Tasks
2026-10-18 12:00:44Zhaoxin Fan, Zheng Zhu, Yuqing Ma, Faguo Wu, Jian Yang, Wenjun WuAbstract
Scientific foundation models increasingly operate on continuous phenomena, yet still use discrete residual computation. We ask whether pretrained residual transformations can support additional latent computation without expanding the backbone. To test this possibility, we introduce Continuum-LM, which reuses these transformations as dynamical operators in a continuous-depth language model. Its hidden states evolve through an ordinary differential equation evaluated by higher-order numerical integration, with solver order and step size controlling computation. Across eight scientific tasks, Continuum-LM trains stably and improves mean exact-match accuracy by 7.77 and 10.96 percentage points over discrete counterparts at the 0.6B and 1.7B scales, respectively. At 0.6B, it also outperforms an Ouro-style recurrent control under matched parameter and residual-function evaluation budgets. Together, these results support extensible computational depth through parameter reuse, identifying continuous hidden-state evolution as a practical design dimension for scientific language models beyond parameter scaling.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26959
PDF
-
LAMB: Latent Multi-Hypothesis Beliefs for Long-Horizon Large Language Agents
2026-10-18 10:41:04Peien Ding, Hui Li, Yuhan Liu, Jinsong SuAbstract
Long-horizon language agents require compact memories that retain interaction evidence while preserving competing hypotheses about unobserved states. Although effective, many belief-state methods encode memory in discrete natural language, where repeated compression can omit evidence or prematurely discard plausible alternatives. We introduce LAMB, a recurrent framework for latent multi-hypothesis beliefs. A Common--Delta factorization combines a shared Common state for interaction evidence with weighted Delta components for competing hypotheses. Relative evidence from action-outcome predictions guides recurrent hypothesis updates without generating textual memory. A context-conditioned readout exposes hypotheses separately to the policy through a fixed-token belief prefix in the default configuration. The belief modules and policy are jointly trained using action imitation and auxiliary state, outcome, and observation-discrimination objectives. Across ALFWorld, BabyAI, ScienceWorld, and Crafter, LAMB matches or outperforms PABU, improving ALFWorld SR@30 and ScienceWorld success by 6.0 and 22.0 percentage points, respectively, and Crafter achievement progress by 26.37 points. On ALFWorld, it also reduces the redundant-action rate by 17.70 percentage points. These results support latent multi-hypothesis beliefs as compact memory for effective long-horizon decision making
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26955
PDF
-
A Multi-granularity Interaction Network for Relational Triple Extraction
Abstract
Relational triple extraction identifies entity relations from raw sentences without depending on entity type information. The performance of traditional methods is seriously degenerated by ``unseen'' entities, because these methods can't build contextual dependencies relevant ``unseen'' entities. This paper addresses this challenge by proposing a multi-granularity interaction network that leverages word-word, entity-relation, and head-tail interactions to capture deep semantic dependencies. By incorporating multiple iterations, the multi-granularity interaction network is effective to refine the representations corresponding to head and tail entities. It enhances the global semantic features associated with relational triples, aiding in the remediation of triples that may have been overlooked or omitted in earlier steps. Strong and consistent performance is achieved by our method on two rearranged datasets, with a significant improvement in identifying relational triples, including those involving ``unseen'' named entities. For example, our model improves F1-score by 3.1%/20.5% over previous approaches on the NYT-R/WebNLG-R datasets in the Unseen metric. Code: this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26952
PDF
-
The Bottleneck Is Retrieval, Not Reading: Diagnosing Evidence-Based Generation with RAG for Long Context Question Answering
2026-10-18 09:10:42Debopriyo Banerjee, Owais Aijaz, Ahmer Tabassum, Zhuohan Xie, Preslav Nakov, Veselin StoyanovAbstract
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is the dominant paradigm for grounding large language models in external corpora, but its similarity-driven, chunked pipeline has structural blind spots: it cannot anticipate which passages a question requires and discards document-level context that resolves cross-passage references. We introduce evidence-based generation (EBG), requiring models to return an answer with line-level citations, and a joint Ans+Evid metric that scores correctness and grounding simultaneously. We reformulate two corpora into evidence-grounded multi-document QA benchmarks- MultiHop-RAG and QASPER-MP, a multi-paper adaptation of QASPER with realistic short paper cues, and pair them with a controlled synthetic two-hop haystack and an evidence-augmented NoLiMa spanning 10K-1M characters. Across ten proprietary frontier and three open-weight LLMs, EBG isolates two RAG limitations that long-context models avoid: similarity retrieval surfaces any relevant chunk far more reliably than all required chunks for multi-fact queries, and chunking destroys document meta-information needed to resolve identity-bearing queries. EBG also exposes grounding failures invisible to answer-only evaluation, including incomplete citations in two-needle settings and a widening gap between Ans and Ans+Evid when context contradicts parametric knowledge. Data and code are available at this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26951
PDF
-
Do We Need the Largest LLMs for Every Clinical Decision?
2026-10-17 22:07:43Ali H. Lazem, William TeahanAbstract
Large clinical language models often require multi-GPU infrastructure, limiting local deployment. We introduce CERTA, a decision-level statistical certificate that determines when a quantized model may substitute for its native BF16 reference and escalates decisions that cannot be certified to it. Across eleven instruction-tuned models, both general-purpose and domain-adapted, from three families (7-72B), we evaluated 2,500 clinical-verification decisions from de-identified patient contexts (2,484 patients), with patient-disjoint calibration and testing. In the higher-power operational analysis, round-to-nearest 8-bit quantization at BF16 storage served 99.8-100% of held-out decisions across all eleven models; formal finite-sample guarantees were assessed separately using the exact split-sample procedure. In the same operational analysis, the class-conditional 4-bit frontier reduced the amortized, BF16-equivalent deployment cost to 25.8% and 27.3% of the BF16 reference for Qwen2.5-72B and HuatuoGPT-o1-72B, respectively, with measured peak memory of 43.0 and 42.7 GB, below the nominal capacity of a single 48 GB accelerator. Deployment on that specific hardware was not directly tested. Under the exact split-sample certificate, which also accounts for configuration selection, these costs were 26.7% and 27.9%. On external disease named-entity benchmarks against human annotations, the frontier-selected NF4 configurations had a mean absolute F1 change of 0.045 on both datasets, with substantial model-specific variation. CERTA converts compression from a fixed precision choice into a risk-controlled deployment policy for this verification task.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26937
PDF
-
AtomSD: Procedural Atom-Guided Self-Distillation for LLM Agents
2026-10-17 14:12:03Bohan Yu, Pengfei Cao, Kai Tian, Chen Han, Shi-Yang Li, Chenxi Zhou, Junlin Liu, Cao Liu, Ke Zeng, Jun Zhao, Kang LiuAbstract
Large language models (LLMs) possess broad factual knowledge and strong reasoning capabilities, but solving complex tasks also requires procedural knowledge about how to act. Existing approaches often represent procedural knowledge through trajectories or bundled skills, limiting flexible reuse across interaction histories. This paper introduces Procedural Atoms, fine-grained and independently applicable units that represent Intent, When, Do, and Avoid guidance. Building on this representation, we propose AtomSD, an Atom-guided Self-Distillation framework in which the learner continually extracts Procedural Atoms from its own successful trajectories and distills them into the evolving policy through Atom-conditioned supervision and task-reward optimization. Comprehensive experiments show that AtomSD consistently outperforms strong reward-based and distillation methods, exceeding the state-of-the-art baseline by up to 9.31 points in average performance. Further analyses demonstrate that the proposed Procedural Atoms provide effective guidance, highlighting the value of atom-level procedural knowledge for policy learning.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.26926
PDF
-
Parametric Session States Recover Retrieval Intent without Replaying History
2026-10-17 05:07:32Qingsen Ma, Dianyun Wang, Jiahong Liu, Irwin KingAbstract
Long-running assistants often interpret follow-up requests whose referents, constraints, and active goals were established many turns earlier. The central challenge is therefore not only context length, but retrieval intent: a current query such as ``use the previous configuration'' may omit the project, entity, and version terms needed to locate relevant evidence. Long-context models can recover those terms by replaying the interaction, but repeatedly pay the cost of processing history. Conventional retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is cheaper, yet assumes an information-sufficient query; conversational rewriting either rereads the history or depends on an explicitly maintained textual memory. We introduce \emph{Parametric Session State} (\method{}), a reusable session-memory layer that remembers what to search for while keeping factual knowledge external.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.33047
PDF
-
Finitely Verifiable Segmentation: Decidability for Every Tokenizer with a Finite-State Verifier
Abstract
A segmentation policy assigns to each byte string at most one segmentation into tokens. Call it finitely verifiable when a finite automaton over marked strings, bytes paired with boundary bits, accepts exactly the policy's own segmentations. The automaton judges a proposed segmentation and need not compute one. The paper shows what that hypothesis buys. Four questions that practice settles by folklore become decidable, whether a window certifies a token boundary, whether the boundary gap is bounded, whether a mask keeps generation completable, and whether two policies are equivalent. The last three specialize limitedness, coaccessibility and the equivalence of single-valued transducers. The first refines the synchronizing cut of code theory, and two more ask whether a certified cut, or the cuts of an inventory, let each piece scan alone. The class sits strictly between the online-scannable policies and those with regular domains, and its inner frontier is Choffrut's and decidable in polynomial time. Markings are length-preserving, so the class is exactly the rational segmentation policies, a normal form rather than a restriction, and what the decisions need is a supplied verifier. The class is closed under the operations pipelines use: composition over a labeled stage, restriction, splitting, and byte-fallback union of literal policies. Each composite inherits the six decisions, and certificates transfer between stages under four laws. Under rational, unifilar, almost surely stopping finite-state sources, each mass of the weighted section is an exact rational, and so is each rate where expected length is positive. Maximal-munch lexing, canonical byte-pair encoding and two-mode WordPiece instantiate the interface, and the munch library implements all six decisions. Every theorem carries an executable check, and every reported statistic is a program's own output.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30168
PDF
-
DiscoveryRSI: Recursively Learning to Discover Valuable Hypotheses
2026-10-16 17:56:35Jianyuan Zhong, Chenwei Wu, Zhaochen Yu, Xixian Jiang, Xuewei Li, Hao Xiao, Xilin Dai, Junyang Wang, Jiaru Zou, Zhiqing Cui, Boyuan Zheng, Jing Xiong, Zhen Zhang, Qiang Gao, Michael Morley, Luis Nakayama, Qiang Xu, Liyue Shen, Tao Gui, Leo Anthony Celi, James Zou, Zhenfei Yin, Yingcheng Wu, Ling YangAbstract
Scientific discovery requires developing worthwhile hypotheses into practical investigations, yet learning from this evolving research process remains challenging. We introduce an operational definition of valuable and testable research hypotheses: evidence-grounded claims about consequential uncertainties, coupled with feasible investigations, explicit decision criteria, and alternative explanations. Our DiscoveryRSI framework develops hypothesis trees through multi-agent evolutionary search, compiles selected investigations into executable Harbor tasks, and recursively learns through three mechanisms: hypothesis credit optimization attributes scientific assessments to documented research contributions; harness replay identifies productive strategies and recurring failures to refine research workflows; and rediscovery applies accepted improvements to new investigations, generating further experience for subsequent learning. We also introduce DFM-Bench, which provides comprehensive assessment of hypothesis quality and cumulative research progress at the levels of hypotheses, revisions, development paths and research runs. Across four life-science domains, automated evaluation shows that hypothesis quality rises from 4.86 for the base model to 5.39 after two rounds of self-improvement, with the large gains in falsifiability and data resolvability. We further validate hypothesis quality through expert review, comparing our DiscoveryRSI-27B with other research agents. Preliminary human assessments show that DiscoveryRSI-27B scores higher than GPT-6 Luna on hypothesis importance and whether claims are plausible and evidence-bounded. DiscoveryRSI-27B achieved a 6.3% rate of hypothesis correspondence with research published after the model cutoff, largely outperform GPT-6 with 2.5% and Claude Opus 5 with 2.3%, while delivering greater human-rated improvement along research paths.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23839
PDF
-
Beyond the Answer: Student-Conditioned Trace Construction for Reasoning Distillation
2026-10-16 17:52:58Shaoang Li, Yanhang Shi, Yufei Li, Mingfu Liang, Frank Shyu, Sandeep Pandey, Luke Simon, Xi Liu, Jian LiAbstract
A reasoning trace can accompany a correct answer without providing effective supervision for a particular student. We study how to construct traces that improve learning beyond answer-only supervision by considering both their intermediate content and their accessibility to the target learner. We introduce ReDiST, a student-conditioned trace-construction and distillation framework for evidence-rich reasoning. Starting from the student's own attempts, ReDiST revises answer-correct drafts against the supplied evidence and repairs unsuccessful drafts with additional guidance from the verified answer. A frozen student-matched reader screens and ranks original and edited candidates using answer recovery and verified-answer probability, given the question, evidence, and candidate trace. We distill the selected targets while balancing trace and final-answer supervision with an auxiliary answer loss. Construction and selection occur offline, and inference uses only the distilled student. Experiments on question-answering benchmarks show that ReDiST can improve both source-task and cross-benchmark performance over answer-only, original-trace, and the evaluated trace-selection and rewriting baselines. Across supervision recipes, performance rankings can differ between source and transfer benchmarks, highlighting the importance of evaluating trace teaching utility across distributions.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23831
PDF
-
Acceptance Is Not Speed: Length Inflation in Training-Free Lossy Speculative Decoding
Abstract
Speculative decoding typically characterizes speedup by draft tokens accepted per verification round. Lossless verification preserves the target model's output distribution and thus expected completion length, making this metric a meaningful efficiency proxy. Relaxed (lossy) verification accepts tokens that lossless verification would reject, potentially altering that distribution. We identify a length inflation phenomenon: relaxed verification lengthens completions, primarily by extending reasoning traces, largely offsetting apparent gains in accepted tokens per round. We evaluate existing training-free relaxed verification rules on twelve target-drafter pairs against lossless verification on identical prompts, measuring completion length, verifier rounds, wall-clock time, and task accuracy. At each rule's most relaxed evaluated setting, relaxed verification on average accepts $1.34\times$ as many tokens per round but produces $1.54\times$ longer completions. For rules with higher acceptance lengths, tokens accepted only under relaxed verification tend to have low target-model probability, contributing to length inflation. For rules that reduce verifier rounds, accuracy typically drops substantially. Further analysis traces some failures to continued reasoning that exhausts the budget needed to deliver a final answer. Overall, accepted tokens per round alone is an unreliable measure of decoding speed under relaxed verification. Completion length and verifier rounds must also be reported to assess actual efficiency.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23818
PDF
-
Steering beyond Language: Improving Multilingual Training-Free Text Embeddings via Paired-Residual Subspace Removal
2026-10-16 17:30:43Ailiang Lin, Zhuoyun Li, Yusong Wang, Keyu Mao, Kotaro Funakoshi, Manabu OkumuraAbstract
While deriving text embeddings directly from frozen LLMs has emerged as a promising direction, existing methods focus almost exclusively on English, leaving multilingual settings largely unexplored. In this work, we present the first systematic study of multilingual training-free text embeddings in LLMs. Our analysis reveals a language-conditioned embedding geometry in which semantically equivalent sentences remain misaligned across languages. We hypothesize that language-specific variation can be disentangled from semantic content to improve embedding quality. To this end, we propose Paired-Residual Subspace Removal (PRSR), a training-free inference-time intervention that steers LLM representations toward a more language-invariant semantic space. PRSR first constructs paired residuals from multilingual parallel sentences to capture language-specific deviations. It then estimates layer-wise low-rank subspaces from these residuals and suppresses the corresponding components in the last-token hidden states. We conduct more than 200 monolingual evaluations across 18 languages using MTEB and MMTEB, along with cross-lingual bitext mining between English and over 200 other languages. Empirical results demonstrate that PRSR consistently improves the performance of existing training-free baselines in both monolingual and cross-lingual settings across different LLMs.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23807
PDF
-
DLite: History-free Speculative Decoding for Agentic AI
2026-10-16 17:18:54Jiaming Xu, Hanzhen Wang, Tianlang Zhao, Jiewen Xiao, Chengze Yuan, Jiayi Pan, Yongkang Zhou, Jiancai Ye, Yu Wang, Guohao DaiAbstract
Speculative decoding has become a mainstream technique for accelerating large language model (LLM) inference by using a lightweight draft model to generate candidate tokens that are subsequently verified by the target model. However, agentic workloads introduce long and continuously evolving contexts and frequent multi-turn interactions. Under such workloads, we observe that existing draft models suffer from up to an 80% degradation in acceptance length, while maintaining their historical KV cache introduces substantial system overhead. In this paper, we identify the growing historical context as a common source of both problems and introduce DLite, a history-free speculative decoding framework for agentic AI. DLite directly reuses contextual hidden states from the target model and performs local speculative prediction without explicitly maintaining the historical context, transforming an increasingly complex modeling problem into local simple prediction problem. A lightweight sequential head further restores intra-block causal dependencies with low overhead. To effectively train this heterogeneous history-free architecture, we introduce a tailored two-stage training strategy. Experiments on general-purpose, long-context and agentic workloads show that DLite achieves 2-6 acceptance length and outperforms the state-of-the-art speculative decoding method, DSpark, up to 70%.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23787
PDF
-
VocalGrad: Evaluating Acoustic Perception in Audio Language Models
2026-10-16 16:54:35Koki Ryu, Hitomi YanakaAbstract
Recent large audio language models (LALMs) have extended their capabilities beyond lexical speech understanding to tasks requiring paralinguistic and non-linguistic audio understanding, such as emotion recognition. However, these models still struggle to reliably utilize acoustic information, particularly when it co-occurs with spoken linguistic content. Existing benchmarks do not clearly distinguish acoustic perception from higher-level reasoning, making it difficult to identify the source of these failures. To address this issue, we introduce VocalGrad, a benchmark designed to evaluate LALMs' ability to perceive low-level acoustic variations. VocalGrad formulates this problem as a simple binary classification of temporal change direction, enabling evaluation largely independent of higher-level reasoning or semantic understanding. Our benchmark results reveal a substantial gap in acoustic perception between human annotators and state-of-the-art LALMs: while human annotators achieve high accuracy, LALMs perform at near-chance levels. We further conduct linear probing to identify structural bottlenecks in these models. Our analysis reveals two distinct failure modes: for some categories, task-relevant information is preserved in internal representations but not utilized by the language model head; for others, the information becomes progressively less linearly decodable across model layers. Overall, our results reveal substantial limitations of LALMs in modeling acoustic variation under controlled settings and expose representation differences not observable from text outputs.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23745
PDF
-
The Italian lawmaking process: a unified and structured dataset
2026-10-16 16:52:11Matilde Contestabile, Chiara Ferrara, Giovanni Parrillo, Lorenzo Emer, Andrea VandinAbstract
The Italian legislative process is documented in detailed parliamentary records hosted in institutional websites. However, much of this information is available only as unstructured text, limiting its systematic reuse. We applied a controlled, systematic LLM-based extraction procedure, validated against manually annotated records, to convert these texts into ordered and dated events including, e.g., bill introduction, committee examination, plenary examination, and approval. The resulting dataset reconstructs the procedural histories of all 5346 Italian laws enacted between 1985 and 2026, spanning parliamentary terms IX to XIX, for overall 101413 events. Each event records the activity, date, and chamber, with additional procedural details where available. The dataset supports research in the emerging fields of computational legal and legislative studies, potentially combined with process-oriented data science methods to examine procedural paths and legislative timing across parliamentary terms.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23741
PDF
-
Bridging the Language Gap in Scholarly Data II: Enhancing Gender Inference for Chinese Names
2026-10-16 16:44:41Lisette Esp\'in-Noboa, Mingrong She, Ana Maria Jaramillo, Liuhuaying YangAbstract
Perceived gender inference from names is important for inclusive scientometrics research, yet existing methods perform poorly on non-Western scholars. We address this gap for Chinese names, which appear in two forms, Hanzi and Pinyin, its Romanized form (e.g., Zhang Wei, Li Na). In international bibliographic records, names are often available only in Pinyin. However, a single pinyin name can correspond to multiple distinct hanzi characters with different gender associations, so gender inference from Pinyin alone is intrinsically ambiguous. To address this, we first develop two hanzi models, a regression model that produces a continuous gender score from 0 (male) to 1 (female), and a classification model that outputs one of three labels (\em{male}, \em{neutral}, \em{female}). We train them on a sample of hanzi names from Chinese-language physics publications, rated by 11 native Chinese speakers. On this sample, the models achieve an RMSE of $0.09$ and an R$^2$ of $0.85$ (regression), and macro-AUC of $0.97$ and a Cohen's $\kappa$ of $0.81$ (classification), demonstrating high performance that is robust to class imbalance. For pinyin names, we propose a pipeline that aggregates hanzi predictions via transliteration and frequency weighting, together with an ambiguity score that flags names whose gender cannot be resolved from Pinyin alone. Benchmarked against three off-the-shelf tools (Namsor, GPT, and Claude), our models achieve the highest agreement with human annotations for both gender scores and gender labels, in both scripts. Applied to an independent sample of Chinese-named authors in APS journals, our models assign a gender to every name, whereas existing Pinyin-based methods leave between 20\% and 100\% of names unclassified. These findings demonstrate the importance of hanzi-level information for reliable gender inference of Chinese names. Code and data are publicly available.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23734
PDF
-
Recognizing Study Lineage Is Not Enough: Over-Crediting Same-Trial Evidence in LLM-Based Medical Verification
2026-10-16 16:42:10Mukand Krishna, Anoushka Harit, Chenghao Xiao, Zhongtian SunAbstract
Publication count is not study count. A model can identify shared trial lineage correctly in a direct task yet over-credit a second publication from the same trial when aggregating evidence. We evaluate this behavior in medical LLM verification using 14 source-audited clinical families and five model conditions. The families span provenance, clinical applicability, result direction, and composition; the provenance families provide the direct lineage tests. Recognition and aggregation are separate stateless calls, and repeated calls assess within-input stability. Across all three original provenance families, GPT-5.5 identifies the independent update in 10/10 recognition calls per family but over-credits the same-trial report in 5/5 separate aggregation calls per family. Selected Qwen3-4B and Ministral-3-8B conditions show the same cross-task contrast. A study-grouping instruction reduces GPT-5.5 over-credit from 4/5 to 0/5 in each later pure-provenance family. Other model conditions show mixed behavior, and rejected outputs limit several comparisons. The results identify a behavioral gap between elicited lineage recognition and evidence aggregation. The code and data artifacts are available at this https URL.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23721
PDF
-
The Cognitive Cost of LLM Writing: A Reading-Time Comparison with Human Text
2026-10-16 16:35:41Kamer Cekini, Elisabetta Biondi, Chiara Boldrini, Andrea Passarella, Marco ContiAbstract
Although linguistic differences between human-written and Large Language Model (LLM)-generated texts have been extensively studied, their implications for the cognitive effort involved in reading remain less explored. In psycholinguistics, reading time is commonly used as an indirect measure of cognitive processing effort. Building on this perspective, we investigate whether human-written texts and their LLM-generated rewrites exhibit differences in predicted reading time that may reflect differences in processing demands for readers. To this end, we introduce RoBERTa-RT, a model trained on human eye-tracking data to predict word-level reading times. We evaluate the model on both internal and external test sets, construct a paired dataset of 496 human-written articles and their LLM-generated rewrites, and apply RoBERTa-RT to compare their predicted reading times. Our findings show that LLM-generated rewrites tend to be shorter and have slightly lower predicted total reading times, while exhibiting higher predicted reading times per word. These differences are associated with systematic linguistic changes, including longer and less frequent words, greater lexical diversity, and higher contextual predictability. From a cognitive perspective, our findings suggest that LLM-generated writing may redistribute reading demands: reducing the amount of text to process while increasing the predicted processing effort associated with individual words. This highlights the importance of considering not only the linguistic characteristics of machine-generated content, but also its potential implications for human cognitive processing.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23715
PDF
-
VISTA: Steering LLMs with Latent User Values Inferred from a Few Survey Answers
2026-10-16 16:28:57Yinuo Xu, Jadie Adams, Brian Hu, Shivani Kumar, David Jurgens, Arslan BasharatAbstract
Personalizing a language model requires knowing what a person values, which stays largely consistent across tasks. Yet most methods either learn task-specific preferences or place the user's profile in the prompt, where models struggle to act on it. We introduce VISTA (Value-Informed Steering and Targeted Acquisition), which infers a latent profile from users' (full or partial) survey answers, and maps the profile through a hypernetwork to a user-specific steering intervention in a frozen LLM to select answer choices or generate free-text responses. Given the same evidence, VISTA matches or beats in-context profiles on synthetic preferences (Food2D), the World Values Survey (WVS), and PrimeX, without adding prompt tokens. To reduce the cognitive burden of completing full surveys, VISTA also chooses which questions to ask and when to stop: on WVS it stops after 6% of the questionnaire while retaining 94% of the full-history gain, where standard adaptive testing retains at most 42%. The dominant steering direction is an interpretable value axis on which VISTA places unseen users accurately. Our results point toward pluralistic alignment that adapts to individuals at deployable cost.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23702
PDF
-
Beyond the Benchmark: Conditioning, Domains and Failure Modes of Qwen3-TTS
2026-10-16 16:09:20S\'everin Baroudi, Yanis Labrak, Petr Motlicek, Herv\'e Bredin, Ricard MarxerAbstract
Qwen3-TTS reports state-of-the-art zero-shot voice cloning, but its technical report leaves open how the model should be conditioned, how it behaves outside read speech, and how it fails. We characterise its two cloning interfaces, in-context learning (ICL) and X-Vector, against Chatterbox, XTTS-v2 and F5-TTS on read, meeting, emotional and air-traffic-control (ATC) speech, using eighteen objective measures, an LLM judge, a spoofing countermeasure and a listening test. Neither interface dominates: ICL clones timbre more closely from correctly transcribed references, X-Vector clones timing, and ICL degrades sharply when a short reference transcript is wrong. Domain explains four times more variance than system choice. Qwen3-TTS leads on intelligibility and pitch register but trails on prosody, and the objective measures rank systems differently from listeners. An off-the-shelf countermeasure flags its clones no more often than genuine recordings, and on ATC radio it fails for every system. Code and audio are released.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.23678
PDF
