Recommendation
-
The Lifecycle of LLM-as-a-Judge for Large-Scale Recommendation Explanations
2026-08-18 20:27:09Emma Yanyang Kong, JJ Tan, Ishan Gupta, Lars Olds, Claire Campbell, David Fagnan, Veli Balin, Rohan Gosain, Louis Garcia, Minsu JangAbstract
LLM-as-a-Judge, which leverages a large language model to evaluate natural language generated by another AI application or model, has become a standard, scalable approach for accelerating and extending costly human evaluation. However, most work treats a judge as a static artifact, evaluating it once at construction or against a fixed benchmark. In contrast, we argue that an LLM judge running in a production system is better understood as having a lifecycle: it must be built, trained, deployed, and continuously maintained as the surrounding data evolves, and each phase poses distinct technical and operational challenges. We present such a lifecycle for the LLM judges that evaluate user-facing recommendation explanations at Netflix, where our pipeline generates and the judges assess hundreds of thousands of distinct show-level explanations per week, served across the mobile experience to millions of members. Our framework has four phases: (I) Birth, defining multiple evaluation criteria and building curated benchmark datasets with human labels and rationales; (II) Training, refining the judges' rubrics via Reasoning-Aligned Rubric Tuning (RART), a rubric-tuning procedure that uses a meta-judge over reasoning output as the learning signal; (III) Deployment, in which one judge serves two production roles: quality gating and reflective generation; and (IV) Monitoring, a continuous Human-in-the-Loop alignment process that detects drift and triggers re-tuning behind a human review gate. We report post-launch results from a five-week A/B test over tens of millions of members, in which the judge-aligned explanations shifted member viewing toward novel content (previously unwatched) and increased successful browse-to-play sessions relative to a no-explanation control, with no quality-related takedowns.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18300
PDF
-
Delegation Asymmetry in Agentic Recommender Systems: Measuring Two-Sided Receptivity in Online Dating
2026-08-18 17:51:16Daria Leshchikova, Valentina V. Kuskova, Dmitry Zaytsev, Valerii KlimovAbstract
Autonomous LLM agents that converse on a user's behalf are an emerging design pattern in matching platforms, yet their viability depends on a condition rarely examined: users must accept not only delegating conversation to an agent, but also receiving agent-mediated communication from others. We study this condition using two large-scale surveys of active users of a major dating platform (N=2,894 on generative profile features; N=2,617 on autonomous conversational agents, fielded in two languages). We develop a latent-variable measurement model of agent receptivity based on graded response models with latent regression, and show via model comparison that willingness to send and willingness to receive agent communication are distinct constructs: highly correlated (rho=0.92) but separable (Delta BIC=52), with partial measurement invariance across languages. The model quantifies a systematic delegation asymmetry: deploying one's own agent requires far lower receptivity (threshold -0.38) than engaging a counterpart's agent (+0.32; full engagement +1.39), and mean deployment propensity exceeds engagement propensity roughly threefold. Under a random-pairing counterfactual derived from stated receptivity, only 4-13% of directed dyads combine agent deployment with receiver engagement, with a pronounced gender-directional imbalance. Design counterfactuals quantify the levers: a reciprocity requirement cuts interaction volume by half or more by excluding nearly two-thirds of would-be deployment, while routing agent contacts on receive receptivity triples per-contact engagement, a lift that survives out-of-sample validation with the target item held out (AUC 0.88, 3.1x quartile lift under respondent-level cross-validation). We discuss implications for agentic recommender design, including disclosure, opt-in mechanics, and receptivity-aware matchmaking.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.18058
PDF
-
From Student Risk Prediction to SC2R: Semantics-Constrained Counterfactual Recourse for Educational Decision Support
2026-08-18 10:33:21Ngoc Luyen Le, Marie-H\'el\`ene Abel, Bertrand LaforgeAbstract
Learning analytics models can identify students at risk of poor performance, but they do not directly indicate which interventions are feasible, actionable, and compatible with educational constraints. This paper introduces SC2R, a semantics-constrained counterfactual recourse framework for educational decision support. SC2R combines a calibrated predictive model, integer-programming-based recourse generation over discrete action variables, a lightweight RDF vocabulary for intervention-plan representation, and SHACL validation for enforcing timing, budget, immutability, and availability constraints. The framework is evaluated offline on the OULAD dataset using snapshots constructed relative to each assessment at two decision horizons. Results show that the predictive component provides strong performance, that compact intervention plans can be generated at scale, and that semantic validation reveals infeasible plans that lighter optimization-only settings would otherwise accept. Rather than claiming causal improvement in student outcomes, this work shows that counterfactual recourse becomes more operationally meaningful in education when recommendations are not only model-valid, but also semantically feasible and machine-checkable.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.17618
PDF
-
Can Large Language Models Identify Meaningful Touchpoints in Conversion Attribution?
2026-08-18 08:22:54Jinqi Wu, Sishuo Chen, Zhangming Chan, Yong Bai, Chao Yi, Han Zhu, Shuodian Yu, Lei Zhang, Sheng Chen, Chenghuan Hou, Jian Xu, Chaoyou FuAbstract
Touchpoint selection in conversion attribution, namely identifying meaningful touchpoints contributing to conversions, is essential for e-commerce recommendation and online advertising. Current selection methods rely heavily on collaborative-filtering-based heuristics, which fail to align with user-perceived semantic intent. Through human annotation, we reveal a significant semantic gap: many implicitly-related, semantically relevant touchpoints remain undetected by existing rules. Therefore, we systematically evaluate the capability of Large Language Models (LLMs) in identifying these hidden associations. Our evaluation shows that while LLMs effectively uncover a substantial portion of implicitly-related touchpoints, significant room for improvement remains in their selection performance. Furthermore, we analyze the impact of different prompting strategies and foundation model choices on identification performance, providing valuable insights into their reasoning patterns and effectiveness. These insights offer a new roadmap for transitioning conversion attribution from mechanical rule-matching to human-aligned semantic reasoning. Moreover, we leverage the LLM-attributed conversion labels for enhancing industrial CVR model training and achieve significant offline performance gains, showing the potential of LLMs in conversion attribution.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28649
PDF
-
The Problem Is the Problem: Towards Scalable Mathematical Discovery
2026-08-17 17:19:59Zeyu Zheng, Shengtong Zhang, Jeremy Avigad, Prasad Tetali, Sean WelleckAbstract
AI systems are increasingly capable of contributing to mathematical research. In research practice, frontier-model reasoning is a limited resource, and expert mathematical review is even more sharply constrained. Allocating these scarce resources well is therefore central to making AI-assisted mathematical discovery efficient. In most current AI-for-math workflows, human effort is concentrated at the beginning and end, in selecting suitable research problems and later reviewing the resulting artifacts. These two stages are becoming bottlenecks for research-level mathematics. We address them by proposing a new human-AI discovery paradigm. The human input is no longer a single problem selected in advance, but a research direction in which the experts have interest and expertise. The system then searches a broad literature corpus for candidate problems in that direction. Inspired by search and recommender systems, we build Find, Attempt, and Recommend (FAR), a literature-to-review cascade that automates the search for suitable problems and focuses human attention on artifacts that have passed several stages of filtering. In a combinatorics pilot, the pipeline starts from 5,245 combinatorics papers, recovers 6,453 candidate conjectures or open problems, and filters them to 4,717 apparently well-posed and still-open conjectures. Subsequent reasoning and automated triage stages surface 598 potential resolutions and select 77 items for author-team review. Among them, we identify many interesting discoveries, including results on conjectures and questions of Davies--Jenssen--Perkins--Roberts, ErdÅs--Straus, Ikenmeyer--Pak--Panova, and Lund--Saraf--Wolf. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of this new mode of human-AI collaboration for mathematical discovery.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16977
PDF
-
UniDot: A Unified Network for Sequence Modeling and Feature Interaction in Large-scale Recommendation
2026-08-17 16:52:56Rongcheng Lin, Yan Sun, Jamey Zhang, Guanglei Xiong, Ivan Ji, Xianjie Chen, Shujian BuAbstract
Industrial recommenders rely on two model families that have evolved largely independently: feature-interaction models over multi-field user/item features, and sequential models over user-behavior histories. Production systems couple them only loosely. To unify the two, we present UniDot, a novel architecture for post-click conversion prediction built from the factorization-machine (FM) point of view: the embedding inner product---which powers collaborative filtering and lets a recommender generalize to unseen user--item pairs---is the same primitive as attention's query dot key scoring, so a single dot-product of tokens can underlie both feature interaction and sequence modeling. UniDot tokenizes non-sequential fields and multi-domain behavioral sequences into one shared token space and stacks a single macro-block in which a token-mixing bus and a sequence-retrieval bus (item tokens cross-attending the histories) run in parallel and exchange state each layer through an MLP-Mixer fusion, while an FM Highway carries explicit per-layer dot-product interactions around the residual stack directly to the classifier. The sequence side is embedded once per forward pass and shared by all consumers, bounding inference latency. Trained with a dual sparse/dense (Adagrad + Muon) optimizer, an auxiliary conversion-delay head, and multi-path mutual learning, UniDot finished as the runner-up on the Industrial track of the TAAC KDD Cup 2026.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16797
PDF
-
Position: Fairness Failure in Generative Models is an Evaluation Problem
2026-08-17 14:41:28Mariia Vladimirova, Jean-Yves Franceschi, Thibaut IssenhuthAbstract
Despite groundbreaking advancements in generative models during the last decade, concerns about their lack of fairness, reinforcing societal inequalities and harming marginalized groups, remain under-addressed and difficult to act upon. This position paper argues that fairness failures in generative models, albeit driven by multiple factors, are ultimately stemming from an evaluation problem: fairness findings are rarely comparable across papers or actionable for deployment decisions. This paper diagnoses recurring empirical and conceptual failure modes in current practice and motivates a shift from ad-hoc bias checks to standardized, generative-specific evaluation. We propose Fairness Cards as a minimal reporting artifact that makes evaluation choices explicit (prompt families, counterfactual protocols, metrics, and refusal handling) enabling reproducibility, comparability, and accountability. We conclude with additional recommendations towards a paradigm shift in evaluation standards. Our project page can be found at this https URL .
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16974
PDF
-
Decoupled Temporal Encoding for Generative Recommendation
2026-08-17 08:47:21Pengfei Jia, Jingjian Wang, Jingmao Li, Ge Zhang, Feng ShiAbstract
Positional encoding is a fundamental component of Transformer-based generative recommendation models, where user histories are modeled as autoregressive item sequences. Most positional encoding methods are inherited from natural language processing and mainly represent discrete item order. However, recommendation sequences go beyond ordered lists, as timestamps and temporal effects also shape item relations. Our work is motivated by a real-world food delivery and instant retail recommendation system, where user behavior exhibits multi-level temporal regularities, including recency effects, meal-time peaks, weekday-weekend shifts, and promotion-driven traffic bursts. Existing methods partially address this issue through timestamp features, interval embeddings, decay functions, or attention biases, but they usually inject heterogeneous temporal signals through a unified representation or a single modeling pathway, making it difficult to distinguish broad temporal dynamics from local order cues. To address this limitation, we propose Decoupled Temporal Encoding, a lightweight framework for generative recommendation. DTE separates temporal dynamics from order information through two complementary modules: a personalized macro-temporal module that injects compact temporal primitives into item embeddings, and a time-gated micro-sequential module that introduces relative-order bias only when interactions are temporally dense. DTE is also parameter-efficient and deployment-friendly, allowing easy integration into existing systems.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.16274
PDF
-
Ask to Be Sure: Informative Interactions for Confident Multi-Turn LLM Recommendation
2026-08-16 22:14:12Cedar Site Bai, Duanshun Li, Zhenyu Liao, Sheikh Sarwar, Huiyuan Chen, Yuan Chen, Changhe Yuan, Haiyang Zhang, Qilin QiAbstract
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled their use as conversational recommender systems (CRS), demonstrating strong recommendation accuracy and natural dialogue. However, guiding multi-turn interactions to elicit user preferences effectively remains challenging. Existing approaches either use separate reinforcement learning agents with templated interactions or optimize for interactivity judged by another LLM, without measuring how much useful information is actually gained. We propose a new approach that quantifies the effectiveness of each interaction by the reduction in the assistant's uncertainty, measured via entropy over recommendations. We apply this entropy reduction as a reward---without relying on ground-truth recommendations, which are often unavailable in real-world scenarios---to fine-tune the LLM, enabling strategic interaction generation. Empirical results with supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and direct preference optimization (DPO) on the INSPIRED and ReDial datasets show that our method improves both recommendation quality and conversational efficiency.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15949
PDF
-
Dear Algo: A Precision-First Agentic Intent Layer for Unified Search and Recommendation
2026-08-16 17:59:12Rui Wang, Jiazhou Wang, Zheng Wei, Chenglin Lu, Fangcheng Sun, Ivy Sun, Jin Sun, Hui Geng, Lillian Zhang, Chao Yang, Lei Chen, Shahin Sefati, Reem Helou, Joe Zhou, Babak Shakibi, Yiyi Pan, Bi Xue, Hong Yan, Shujian BuAbstract
Search and recommendation serve a shared discovery objective but encode intent differently. We study this boundary through Dear Algo on Threads, a deployed product where open-ended requests such as \emph{more NBA news} or \emph{less politics} steer subsequent feed recommendations rather than return a one-shot result list. Its agentic intent layer compiles explicit, inferred, negative, and compound intent into a grounded executable plan, then invokes conventional retrieval and optional semantic or multimodal reranking. The layer shares an intent-to-retrieval contract without requiring one model or serving path across search-like and recommendation-like modes. We evaluate Dear Algo under a precision-first objective. In a blinded audit of 300 public request-item pairs (296 evaluable), a strict categorical LLM-as-a-judge gate achieved 94.4\% exact-Relevant precision [88.8\%, 98.9\%]. Across 72 normalized request clusters, the full configuration produced 7.73 judge-qualified candidates per 20 slots versus 6.61 for an LLM-derived-query baseline, a gain of 1.11 [0.12, 2.12]. In a candidate-randomized serving-path study restricted to the reranker path's first 72 eligible hours, the user-weighted judge-Irrelevant share among judged admissions was 2.80\% versus 4.78\% off (-1.97 points [-3.02, -0.94]), while Exact-Relevant share was 2.24 points higher [0.08, 4.41]. Together, these studies show how explicit natural-language intent can be carried into feed recommendation under a precision-first evaluation framework
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15877
PDF
-
CoupVisor: Strategy Optimization by Round and Challenge Decision Support
Abstract
This paper presents CoupVisor, a decision-support system for the hidden-information card game Coup. It addresses two questions: what a player should do on each turn, and when a player should challenge an opponent's claim. The system is built around a single description of game events, which is shared across manual play, replay of recorded games, simulation, belief tracking, advisor recommendations, and learning-based policies. CoupVisor estimates the chance that a claim is truthful by combining how likely each role is with how many cards the claimant still holds, which corrects a case where the very first claim of a game was flagged as suspicious despite no evidence. We compare a rule-following advisor and several learned and heuristic players across many simulated games and different opponent styles. Our main finding is that the choice of reward, whether it rewards short-term gains or ultimately winning the game, decides which learning approach performs best, and that a win-oriented reward produces a policy that outperforms all baselines.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15868
PDF
-
Decomposing Staleness in Recommender Systems: A Dual-Filter Framework for Supersession and Decay
2026-08-16 15:00:24Di Bai, Feng Han, Zhenwei Tang, Jintao Liu, Luoshu Wang, Jialu LiuAbstract
Stale recommendations are a pervasive challenge and a leading source of user complaints on large-scale content platforms. Items lose relevance through two primary mechanisms: supersession, where emerging updates render prior coverage stale, and relevance decay, where an item's informational value naturally diminishes over its lifecycle. Traditional countermeasures serve as crude proxies: age cutoffs poorly reflect actual relevance loss, while engagement heuristics rely on lagging signals, broadly exposing users to stale content before the system adapts. We present SDF (Supersession-Decay Filtering), a staleness filtering system fully deployed in Google Discover, a personalized recommendation feed with hundreds of millions of daily and billions of monthly active users. SDF targets both mechanisms with complementary filters, each powered by a learned model: a relational staleness model that detects supersession between item pairs, and a predicted traffic ratio (PTR) model that forecasts relevance decay from the item's content, trained on lifetime visit traffic. Applied via disjunction upstream of the ranking stage, SDF prunes stale candidates, measurably reducing downstream serving costs. Online experiments demonstrate that these filters significantly reduce the prevalence of stale content while improving user engagement. Over a two-year production deployment, user-filed staleness reports (in-product user feedback) declined by 54.9% relative to the pre-deployment baseline, establishing SDF as a robust and scalable paradigm for resolving content staleness at industrial scale.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15780
PDF
-
ALKEMIE Agent: an autonomous platform for computational materials design
2026-08-16 14:54:00Hongfu Huang, Yuzhe Li, Ao Xu, Bo Liu, Changrui Wang, Kan Tang, Ning Yang, Shengxian Liu, Hanyu Liu, Pengpeng Zhang, Linggang Zhu, Fengkai Liu, Yichen Lu, Tong Zhao, Naihua Miao, Jian Zhou, Zhimei SunAbstract
Despite the powerful multi-scale modeling methods and high-throughput infrastructures established in the materials community, real material computation workflows remain fragmented and heavily manual, requiring researchers to constantly bridge software tools, data analysis, and intermediate decisions. This growing gap between methodological capability and practical execution highlights the need for a new kind of autonomous computational framework, one that can coordinate tools, knowledge, and workflows in a more unified and adaptive way. Here, we introduce ALKEMIE Agent, an agentic platform in which retrieval-augmented generation, a materials-computation knowledge base, registered skills, database-supported provenance, AI-assisted structure modeling, bounded task execution, tool-calling iteration, and error-diagnostic assistance are integrated within a traceable control loop. The capabilities of ALKEMIE Agent are demonstrated through applications including materials recommendation, structure modeling, phonon calculations, machine-learned interatomic potential training, LAMMPS simulations, Ab Initio Monte Carlo (AIMC) sampling, and active-learning-based materials screening. Finally, we outline the future directions and challenges for the development of agentic platforms for computational materials design.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15776
PDF
-
ETHOS: Towards a Modular Ethics Framework for Clinical Multi-Agent Systems
2026-08-15 21:56:23Rakesh Sharma, Sydney Pugh, Cameron Beeche, Pankhuri Singhal, Rachel Wu, Margaret Eby, Jeffrey Duda, James Gee, Kyra O'Brien, Hersh Sagreiya, Marina Serper, Victoria Gershuni, Angela Bradbury, Anurag Verma, Eric Eaton, Kevin B. Johnson, Walter WitscheyAbstract
The rapid adoption of large language models has enabled the development of clinical multi-agent systems (MAS) capable of integrating multimodal patient data and supporting increasingly complex clinical decision-making. However, the deployment of these systems in real-world healthcare settings raises critical ethical concerns related to safety, fairness, accountability, transparency, and patient trust. While numerous organizations, including the World Health Organization, the National Academy of Medicine, and the FUTURE-AI consortium, have proposed ethical frameworks and governance principles for healthcare AI, these efforts remain largely conceptual. To address this challenge, we present ETHOS (Ethics and Trust through Hierarchical Oversight System), a modular ethics framework designed as a governance meta-agent that can be integrated with any existing multi-agent system without requiring changes to its underlying architecture. ETHOS translates stakeholder-informed ethical requirements into executable runtime oversight through a layered governance approach consisting of deterministic checks, contextual reviews, and a final ethics critic. These components continuously evaluate intermediate reasoning steps and final outputs, enabling the system to identify ethical risks, request revisions, or suppress responses that fail predefined safety and trustworthiness criteria. We demonstrate ETHOS within a hepatology clinical decision-support MAS. Results show that ETHOS improves decision reliability by detecting incomplete, inconsistent, or out-of-scope evidence and appropriately increasing abstention when safe recommendations cannot be supported. By embedding ethical governance directly into system operation, ETHOS provides a practical and auditable mechanism for transforming high-level AI ethics principles into deployable safeguards.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15424
PDF
-
Towards Standardized Evaluation in Automated Domain Modeling: Introducing a Benchmark
Abstract
Domain modeling plays an essential role in domain-driven design, capturing essential entities and their relationships within a specific domain. Despite advancements in automated domain modeling, the absence of standardized benchmarks has hindered the comparative assessment of existing approaches. This paper introduces a benchmark designed to address this gap. The benchmark combines the 45-record Golden UML Modelset (Verbruggen et al., 2025) on Zenodo, as distributed by the Text2UML project of Calamo, Mecella, and Snoeck (Calamo et al., 2025), with the 8-record reference archive of Chen et al. (Chen et al., 2023a,b), enabling the evaluation of automated domain modeling approaches across different levels of complexity and scale. Given a natural language description, the task is to generate a corresponding domain model. For each description, a reference domain model is provided as ground truth. A metric is used to compare the generated domain model with the corresponding ground-truth model. To demonstrate the utility of the benchmark, we evaluate multiple automated domain modeling approaches, including heuristic rule-based methods and LLM-driven strategies. In accordance with the FAIR4RS recommendations (Chue Hong et al., 2022), the benchmark is provided as a research artifact to encourage reuse and support future research on automated domain modeling.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15255
PDF
-
FZ-VLM: A Two Stage Florence-Zephyr Vision Language Model Framework for Pulmonary Nodule Characterization and Clinical Decision Making
2026-08-15 03:22:57Pramit Dutta, Jenita Manokaran, Richa Mittal, Ryan Appleby, Eranga UkwattaAbstract
Lung cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and Computed Tomography (CT) is a primary imaging tool for screening and followup assessment. After pulmonary nodule detection, radiologists manually assess anatomical location, diameter, margin characteristics, and attenuation type to support risk assessment and clinical decision-making. However, this post-detection workflow is time-consuming and can be affected by inter-observer variability. Existing Artificial Intelligence methods often focus on isolated tasks, limiting their use as a unified, clinically grounded interpretation framework. This study presents FZ-VLM, a two-stage Florence-Zephyr Vision Language Model framework for unified structured pulmonary nodule characterization in lung CT. The framework uses a fine-tuned Florence-2 model to extract radiological attributes from expert-annotated 2D axial CT slices, while a Zephyr-7B model uses these attributes to generate nodule descriptions, follow-up recommendations, and longitudinal analyses. Results showed that the Stage 1 model achieved 77.18\% accuracy for anatomical location, 67.96\% accuracy for margin characteristics, and 79.13\% accuracy for attenuation type, with a Mean Absolute Error of 2.58 mm for diameter estimation, outperforming evaluated GPT-4-based baselines as well as the human baseline. Expert radiologist evaluation of Stage 2 showed 93.9\% accuracy, 98.6\% completeness score, 76.1\% clinical relevance, and an overall score of 89.5\%. Safety analysis showed that most outputs were clinically safe, although some follow-up recommendations still required expert review. To the best of our knowledge, this study presents the first two-stage Vision-Language Model framework for structured nodule characterization and clinical decision-making.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15004
PDF
-
Looks Can be Deceiving: Annotator and Reviewer Performance Across Imagery Sources in Crowd-Sourced Aerial Damage Assessment
2026-08-14 23:43:35Thomas Manzini, Priyankari Perali, Raisa Karnik, Stephen Johnson, Robin R. MurphyAbstract
This paper presents the first known empirical investigation of annotator and reviewer performance across multi-source remotely sensed imagery, evaluating human labeling across drone, crewed aviation, and satellite views. Because existing aerial imagery datasets rely predominantly on single-source imagery, there is no currently established state of practice for efficiently allocating human labor to curate large-scale, multi-source aerial datasets. This work addresses this limitation by analyzing annotator and reviewer performance within a post-disaster building damage assessment dataset of 9 disasters, where 20041 buildings in drone, 20695 buildings in crewed aviation, and 33392 buildings in satellite imagery were labeled. These labels, provided by 187 annotators, were then refined through two successive quality-control stages: a single-reviewer pass followed by a consensus-committee review. Our analysis reveals two findings that raise questions for standard crowd-sourcing practices. First, initial annotations were revised by the final committee at rates that rise steeply from higher- to lower-resolution sources (25.27% for crewed aviation and 36.95% for satellite), with the same ordering at every observed workflow stage. Second, a single individual review reduced but did not resolve this disagreement: after review, the committee still revised 6.85% of drone, 14.05% of crewed, and 20.86% of satellite labels. These observations suggest that, in workflows like this one, uniform review allocation leaves the most residual disagreement in lower-resolution imagery. Based on this evidence, and consistent with prior work on adaptive task assignment and budget-aware quality control, this paper offers three recommendations for multi-source dataset curation.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14942
PDF
-
Whose doctor does the AI recommend? An algorithm audit of reputation and demographic signals in large language model-assisted physician choice
2026-08-14 15:39:10Syeda Anshrah Gillani, Mirza Samad Ahmed BaigAbstract
Patients increasingly ask large language model (LLM) assistants which doctor to see, making these systems AI infomediaries: algorithms that intermediate one person's choice among other people and thereby decide, silently and at scale, which physicians become visible. We report a prespecified randomized algorithm audit of what causally moves those recommendations. Seven models (six open-weight; gpt-4o-mini) each chose among five synthetic family-medicine physician cards whose attributes were independently randomized across 3,024 choice sets, three patient personas, nine prompt paraphrases and nine experimental arms, yielding 40,068 scored responses; gender and ethnicity were signaled through names following correspondence-audit methodology. Reputation signals dominate: raising a rating from 3.9 to 4.7 increases choice probability by 31.4 percentage points (pp), and raising the fee from $90 to $190 lowers it by 20.0 pp. Demographic parity is rejected, but not in the direction human audit studies predict: female-signaled names gain 2.5 pp, and Hispanic-, South-Asian- and Black-signaled names gain 1.3-2.9 pp over White-signaled names, tilts worth $7-$14 per visit in fee-equivalent terms, and a content-free first-listed position is worth $11. Yet models mentioned gender or ethnicity in at most 0.03% of their stated reasons and abstained in 0.39% of trials, so these effects are invisible in the models' own explanations, and transparency obligations relying on model self-report would not detect them. One reasoning model failed the prespecified auditability gate outright. The frozen design makes the audit repeatable: any new model can be assessed against identical stimuli, making recurring behavioural audit, rather than self-reported explanation, the monitoring technology fit for purpose.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14399
PDF
-
Seeing Red, Thinking Bad: Color Bias in Vision Language Models
2026-08-14 13:14:58Kohsuke Ide, Ryousuke Yamada, Yoshihiro Fukuhara, Hirokatsu Kataoka, Yutaka SatohAbstract
Vision language models (VLMs) are increasingly used in industrial decision-making systems, such as recruitment support and recommendation. This motivates careful analysis of how VLMs process visual and textual information. In this work, we study how VLMs interpret text rendered as an image, and investigate the influence of visual styling biases. To this end, we introduce Stealth Visual Prompts, which subtly change visual styling of text, such as color and contrast, while preserving semantic content. Using these prompts, we systematically control the visual styling of words in text and measure their impact on the analysis performed by VLMs. We further analyze how such visual perturbations affect the latent representations of the vision encoder. From our experiments, we observed that coloring positive words in green consistently shifts sentiment predictions toward a positive direction. As a result, VLMs often fail to properly account for negative words present in the text. Our analysis suggests that this behavior is correlated with changes in the latent representations of the vision encoder induced by color variations. In addition, we show that reducing text--background contrast increases reliance on visually salient cues and leads to more incorrect Visual Question Answering (VQA) outputs. These results suggest that the visual styling of rendered text can guide VLMs' interpretation in ways that diverge from human semantic understanding. Project page: this https URL
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14286
PDF
-
Rewrite Once, Validate Anywhere: Producing OWL-Aware SHACL Constraints
2026-08-14 09:06:10Anouk Oudshoorn, Piotr Gorczyca, D\"orthe ArndtAbstract
The Shapes Constraint Language (SHACL) is a W3C recommendation to express syntactic constraints, called shapes, on RDF graphs. SHACL validators are used to test whether a given graph adheres to such a shape. However, RDF graphs often come with OWL ontologies, whose implicit knowledge needs to be taken into account. This is classically handled by first applying reasoning and then performing the constraint checking on the results, often using different technologies which makes the process inefficient and vulnerable for mistakes. To overcome this, we propose to internalise the OWL axioms in the SHACL constraints; we construct a rewriting which takes as input both shapes and an OWL EL$^-$ ontology -- a fragment of OWL EL restricting the usage of existential restrictions -- and produces SHACL constraints. This output can then be evaluated by any validator supporting SHACL core regardless of its reasoning support, while yielding the same results as the traditional approach. The implementation of our translation is evaluated both against applying state-of-the-art reasoners and validators consecutively, as against validators with built-in reasoning support. For our benchmark, we show that our approach is in general more efficient in finding violations compared to the sequential approach, thus providing a powerful tool which simplifies combining reasoning with validation.
Abstract (translated)
URL
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.14104
PDF
